Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Spence: Pacquiao's Fearless; His People Probably Say 'Nah'

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Oregonian View Post
    —————

    After losing to Alvarado did Brandon Rios earn his shot at PAC?
    After losing to Floyd did Mosley earn a shot at PAC?
    After losing to Mosley did Margarito earn a shot?
    After losing to Cotto did Clottey earn a shot?
    After losing 3 straight fights did Broner earn a shot?
    After losing to Garcia did Mathysse earn a shot at PAC?
    After Hatton lost to Floyd did he earn a shot at PAC?
    Did Jeff Horn earn a shot at PAC?

    Do you see where I am getting at?

    Pretty sure you believe Khan has earned a shot when PAC fights him next?

    Great Spence should take 5% After all you are lumping him in with those fighters.

    Who has Spence fought to be up on Pacquiao's level?

    Why should 40 year old Pacquiao come in and clean house at 147 again when the like of Spence, Crawford and Thurman avoid each other.


    Spence needs to stop playing chicken and earn that shot.

    Comment


    • #22
      A lot of people that are against Pacquiao-Spence (PBC) were in favor of Pacquiao-Crawford (Top Rank). It's an interesting dichotomy because promoter affiliation made one fight a passing of the torch (Crawford), and the other a desperate attempt to avoid Keith Thurman (Spence). Now that Pacquiao has moved over to PBC and beaten Thurman, Spence is now ducking Crawford, who still has no signature win at 147. Seems that Top Rank fighters quite con****uously have a hard time making fights.

      Comment


      • #23
        Spence needs to earn his shot. We’ll see if he beats Porter. PAC can choose whomever, his legacy set in stone. Top 3 GOAT

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
          Great Spence should take 5% After all you are lumping him in with those fighters.

          Who has Spence fought to be up on Pacquiao's level?

          Why should 40 year old Pacquiao come in and clean house at 147 again when the like of Spence, Crawford and Thurman avoid each other.

          Spence needs to stop playing chicken and earn that shot.
          ———-

          Dude, stop running your mouth. I asked you a very simple question and listed all the BUMS that somehow “earned” a shot at PAC.
          Did they earn that shot at PAC?
          It’s a very simple YES or NO answer.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Sustanon View Post
            He (PAC) already is..
            You may be right.

            Comment


            • #26
              Spence doesn’t need to earn a shot against Pacquiao. He is already worth of one. He sits at the top of the WW Division. However, I’m against Spence calling for the fight against an old Legend. Pacquiao is not the same fighter he once was. Spence should clean house in the division. Thurman, Porter, Garcia, and then the Crawford fight. Pacquiao should look for big paydays against lesser opponents. Spence besting Pacquiao at this age would prove little to me.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by gabossboy View Post
                Spence doesn’t need to earn a shot against Pacquiao. He is already worth of one. He sits at the top of the WW Division. However, I’m against Spence calling for the fight against an old Legend. Pacquiao is not the same fighter he once was. Spence should clean house in the division. Thurman, Porter, Garcia, and then the Crawford fight. Pacquiao should look for big paydays against lesser opponents. Spence besting Pacquiao at this age would prove little to me.
                Spot on. Even though at age 40 PAC can still probably beat Spence by UD, Pac needs to do one more high paying fight and call it a career. Already broke several records and is top 3 greatest of all time boxers ever.

                Spence in the other hand still hasn’t proven much, he has no wars under his belt. Needs to fight DG, Thurman after Porter. And then Crawford. But I think Crawford beats Spence honestly.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Tatabanya View Post
                  If they fight and Pacman wins, he becomes one of the five P4P best ever.
                  I'd actually argue he would have a debate for the #1 spot

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    If Pacquiao was fearless he wouldn't have ducked Floyd for 6 years.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Pac won't fight Spence especially if he does a job on Porter as I expect....I just hope he doesn't lower himself to fighting a clown like Khan I would sooner him retire.Out of the Garcia's (both decent fights) Danny would be my pick.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP