Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Imagine AJ fought like Fury against Wallin

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by BangEM View Post
    You obviously don't watch boxing.

    AJ fights on the front foot and he's by far the best inside fighter amongst the big/tall HWs.
    AJ hardly ever fights on the inside. Long and mid range is where he likes to be and does his best work. Fury is actually better than AJ on the inside.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by kafkod View Post
      AJ hardly ever fights on the inside. Long and mid range is where he likes to be and does his best work. Fury is actually better than AJ on the inside.
      You don't know about boxing. AJ has knocked multiple opponents out on the inside. He knocked down Ruiz fighting on the inside and almost took Wlad's head fighting on the inside. Fury never fights on the inside and the only time I saw Fury fight inside was against Wallin and that's because Wallin is a bum. Against any other decent opponent - he would get knocked out trying that shyt.

      Fury is a back foot fighter and a running Kangaroo.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by kafkod View Post
        Do you actually watch boxing or just drool over pictures of AJ posing and flexing?

        Fury didn't go life and death with Johnson, he beat him easily by shut out UD without taking a single clean punch the whole fight.

        And Johnson is not the only opponent Fury and AJ have in common.

        How can a so called UK boxing fan not know that Fury and AJ both fought Wlad Klitschko, and that Fury handled Wlad easily while AJ went life and death with him and came very close to being KO'd.
        You're an idiot, you Polish muppet. He went 12rds against Kevin Johnson and AJ blasted him out in 2rds.

        Go suck Fury's balls and fu.ck out of the thread. You Eastern European idiots are irritating. Piss off, man.

        Comment


        • #44
          You Polish muppets are going on ignore, henceforth.

          Annoying bellends.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
            I imagine that if AJ fought like that against Wallin, ****Em would be starting threads about how Joshua won almost every round despite a cut and showed tremendous heart against a quality and tricky southpaw.

            What do I win for guessing the right answer?
            You're a dumb incel with the IQ of a rat, on ignore you go.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by BangEM View Post
              No excuses. The Swedish bum shouldn't have laid a glove on him if Fury is a good as advertised.

              Too goddamn right that is!


              Fury isn't nearly as great as he's talked up to be. Nothing about him is.

              I do consider him the lineal, but, the lineal is a ****ing mess of a title and always has been. If lineal was worth a **** we wouldn't have sanctioning bodies in the first place.

              They talk about his skills and similarities to The Greatest but leave out how on par Tyson is. Tyson's a ****ty version of Ali. Like a comedian doing an Ali impression.

              Even his crowning achievements are a bit ****. Getting up after Wilder knocked the **** out of him...great, but, Wilder did knock the **** out of him though and if he was as great as folks say Wilder shouldn't have touched him. And Wlad, great, but Wlad's got no resume worth a ****, no sequence or stand out performance worth a ****, no rivalry worth a ****, not a single voluntary his entire career, and he used an amatuer set of techniques against a division of fat, undersized, and over-the-hill contenders. Outside of not losing to an utter bum or CW what the hell did Wlad actually ever do?

              Do I like Fury, sure, he's got a pivot and in this era just being able to pivot makes you elite as ****, but he is seriously overrated by quite a few. His accomplishments, his title, and his skills are all vastly overrated. He's not that damn impressive. The best thing he ever did was not be KO'd by Wilder. That's not skills. Heart, sure, but not skills. His skills got him laid out flat on his back.

              Overrated as ****.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                Wallin is definitely not a bum, but it was the horrible cut Fury suffered in the 3rd round that put him under pressure.
                I'll eat those words if he has a successful career after this but something tells me he'll be back to obscurity in no time at all.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
                  Too goddamn right that is!


                  Fury isn't nearly as great as he's talked up to be. Nothing about him is.

                  I do consider him the lineal, but, the lineal is a ****ing mess of a title and always has been. If lineal was worth a **** we wouldn't have sanctioning bodies in the first place.

                  They talk about his skills and similarities to The Greatest but leave out how on par Tyson is. Tyson's a ****ty version of Ali. Like a comedian doing an Ali impression.

                  Even his crowning achievements are a bit ****. Getting up after Wilder knocked the **** out of him...great, but, Wilder did knock the **** out of him though and if he was as great as folks say Wilder shouldn't have touched him. And Wlad, great, but Wlad's got no resume worth a ****, no sequence or stand out performance worth a ****, no rivalry worth a ****, not a single voluntary his entire career, and he used an amatuer set of techniques against a division of fat, undersized, and over-the-hill contenders. Outside of not losing to an utter bum or CW what the hell did Wlad actually ever do?

                  Do I like Fury, sure, he's got a pivot and in this era just being able to pivot makes you elite as ****, but he is seriously overrated by quite a few. His accomplishments, his title, and his skills are all vastly overrated. He's not that damn impressive. The best thing he ever did was not be KO'd by Wilder. That's not skills. Heart, sure, but not skills. His skills got him laid out flat on his back.

                  Overrated as ****.
                  That's basically what I don't get. The guy is basically average albeit he moves well for his height. He doesn't do anything special and he's very beatable, as shown by all the bums he struggled against. He's a one-hit wonder whose claim to greatness is by running for 12rds against an uninspired Wlad in the most boring fight of all time. I don't even see anything special in the Wilder fight since Wilder has no skill and he's a head hunter.

                  I would be indifferent about FUry as a Brit (not a fan) but the way these idiots talk about him while putting down boxers that have achieved more than and faced tougher opponents is what irks me. And Fury himself is a loudmouthed idiot.

                  People can always be a fan of Fury without talking down other boxers that have actually impacted the sport and made it fun to watch. Fury hasn't done anything for boxing even at British level. The guy is just an opportunist with casual nutjobs populating his fanbase.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP