Floyd never took any risks
Collapse
-
-
In the thread regarding what posters look like, another poster suggested I looked like this, so I've been using it as my avi ever since.waa waa waaa shut your punk ass up, go eat a ****, bet preferably you'd want a midget ****, sick freak
ain't no one got your midget cock suckin ass on ignore the fuck u talkin bout? putting u on ignore ain't a bad idea though so i won't have to see your midget fetish avatar all the time
find a foot fetish or something else, but a midget fetish? shiiiiiieeet
Ok well its good to know you took me off ignore. Thank you.
You still haven't addressed the post. You've made some gay jokes but my point still stands.Comment
-
As usual, you've avoided answering the question in the post and instead posted incoherent gibberish.Some have pointed out that Floyd was the favorite going into the Corrales fight but to make things worse, Diego was in a heap of trouble due to being weight drained and had the flu that week.
Floyd markets Maidana as a KO artist then has him fight in pillow gloves. Then cries to get the "right" ref to deduct points!
Canelo was supposedly the "bigger" guy but Floyd made sure that he had to drain him down to 152lbs! Besides youth (but green fighter), Floyd basically tried to take away Canelo's only true advantage! Height and reach? Floyd had an advantage on reach while they were basically the same height!
See, even others have called you out that for Floyd, you have been trying to protect your hero from taking risks while you still want Manny to fight Crawford and Spence!
Yet, here you are, trying to defend Floyd as a risk taker!
Comical!
You are making excuses why these men lost most likely because you picked them to beat Floyd. If making Canelo come in at 152 is not a rsik, how can Manny fighting Cotto at 145, Morales at 130 or Margs at 151 be "risk"? I know you'd like to have it both ways but you can't.
Manny is scheduled to fight the winner of Spence/Porter to unify the titles. If he were to win, we all would expect him to fight Crawford for all 4 belts. What is wrong with that? What does that have to do with this thread?Comment
-
Can you not understand that people have forgiven Pac for his cw against cott o he has more than made up for it. Floyd not so much, has a cw against nel o then retires in 2 years without another 154lb fight.
If making Canelo come in at 152 is not a rsik, how can Manny fighting Cotto at 145,
Manny is scheduled to fight the winner of Spence/Porter to unify the titles. If he were to win, we all would expect him to fight Crawford for all 4 belts. What is wrong with that? What does that have to do with this thread?
Whilst Pac has campaigned at 147 for many more years and great wins at 147. Floyd wasn't going to have much more of a career so why not go out all guns blazing rather than a whimper. Whe n did Floyd fight outside America again?.How can you say floyds taken risks and expect to be taken seriously? Floyd s famous as Mr cautious so how can he then be a risk taker in same breath. You can't have it both ways!
Pac s best of era, he doesn't need to fight spence or crawfird. He can do as he pleases. There's no more mountains to climbLast edited by hugh grant; 09-25-2019, 07:01 PM.Comment
-
Manny isn’t my hero. I respect most boxers and Floyd and manny are two of my fav fighters but I don’t follow blindly like you *****s or gtards or *******s or gintards and so on and so on. I call a spade a spade doesn’t matter what. I keep it real something the vast majority of posters on here especially you are afraid to do. Keep hating with your ignorant azz and kick rocksComment
-
why lie like that?? hell he beat Manny himself 2 years after beating Canelo...he literally beat Manny but claims he took no risk??? but try to praise Manny??? this is hilariousCan you not understand that people have forgiven Pac for his cw against cott o he has more than made up for it. Floyd not so much, has a cw against nel o then retires?
Whilst Pac has campaigned at 147 for many more years and great wins at 147. Floyd wasn't going to have much more of a career so why not go out all guns blazing rather than a whimper. Whe n did Floyd fight outside America again?.How can you say floyds taken risks and expect to be taken seriously? Floyd s famous as Mr cautious so how can he then be a risk taker in same breath. You can't have it both ways!
Pac s best of era, he doesn't need to fight spence or crawfird. He can do as he pleases. There's no more mountains to climbComment
-
Well who would have been a favorite over him?? Unless he moved to a 6th div there was no one anybody who knows boxing would pick as a favorite. Btw I think Correlas was 6-5 and pick um at time of fight. Don't think SRR was ever an underdog either and im sure I could think of a few others. Really its a compliment because he fought over 20+ world champs and was the lineal champ In 4 divisions.Floyd was the favorite in every single fight in his career. why didn't he take any risks? pac has been uhe underdog at least 4 times i could find, probably more. canelo 3 times. eric crumble every time. do you think it hurts floyds legacy? do you think someday floyd will be rememberd as the risk-averse bum basher of his day? similar to how ggg is now?Comment
-
wow you look like the midget who tried to nunchuck tommy? you look like the elf midget who married to that asian ******? dam u should've just admitted to having a midget fetishIn the thread regarding what posters look like, another poster suggested I looked like this, so I've been using it as my avi ever since.
Ok well its good to know you took me off ignore. Thank you.
You still haven't addressed the post. You've made some gay jokes but my point still stands.
and ain't no one ever ignored your punk midget fetish ass
i've addressed the post but you're just too ****** to comprehend you fagot midget admiring posLast edited by Gigantes; 09-25-2019, 06:00 PM.Comment
-
I meant Floyd had a one off fight at 154 and didn't campaign there like PAC did at 147. If Floyd isnonly having one fight at 154 why not at full 154.? But that's beside the point. People will criticise Floyd more as PAC has more than made up for his CW against cotto. Floyd hasn't. It's not hard to understand me if you try.
PACs going to fight 10 more years after his CW with cotto so why can't PAC have a cw? Why begrudge him that? Nelo is floyds legacy fight. People will be hard on Floyd for his CW and rightly so if theirs justice in worldLast edited by hugh grant; 09-25-2019, 06:47 PM.Comment
-
Manny had a 1 off fight at 154 and fought Margo at 150...Nelo is Floyds legacy fight yet you say Manny is the best fighter of this era BUT FLOYD BEAT HIM??? How does that even make sense? nothing you posted makes sense..Floyd was a unified and lineal champ at 154 and 147 at the same timeI meant Floyd had a one off fight at 154 and didn't campaign there like PAC did at 147. If Floyd isnonly having one fight at 154 why not at full 154.? But that's beside the point. People will criticise Floyd more as PAC has more than made up for his CW against cotto. Floyd hasn't. It's not hard to understand me if you try.
PACs going to fight 10 more years after his CW with cotto so why can't PAC have a cw? Why begrudge him that? Nelo is floyds legacy fight. People will be hard on Floyd for his CW and rightly so if theirs justice in worldComment
Comment