Floyd never took any risks

[Curtis Harper]

Man you are ******ed. Pac just fought a young prime WW champ! And beat him! The fact that you even have to ask that shows you don’t know ish about boxing. Gtfoh hater with sh it as brains

Thurman -
2017) tough fight with Danny
INJURY GAP
2019) subpar performance vs Josesito

In steps Pac.

Let's play by your rules. PRIOR to Thurman......what risks ????

And do try not to be the prototypical Pac fan with your emo outbursts

[The Big Dunn]

This thread is interesting. Both Floyd and Manny fight opponents in 70/30 type fights. There are posters that will give Manny credit for "taking a risk" and not Floyd, even though each has the same chance of winning.

Floyd defeats Corrales as an underdog and that is not considered taking a risk. Floyd fights bigger men and that isn't considered taking a risk. Yet if Manny wins as an underdog or fights a bigger man it is considered taking a risk.

How is this possible?

[Gigantes]

This thread is interesting. Both Floyd and Manny fight opponents in 70/30 type fights. There are posters that will give Manny credit for "taking a risk" and not Floyd, even though each has the same chance of winning.

Floyd defeats Corrales as an underdog and that is not considered taking a risk. Floyd fights bigger men and that isn't considered taking a risk. Yet if Manny wins as an underdog or fights a bigger man it is considered taking a risk.

How is this possible?

the woman beater *floyd was an underdog early in his career wow, after that he became a vacation taking woman beating punk. your punk ass wants 40+ year old manny to fight crawford and spence yet where was the woman beater *floyd in fighting sergio or ggg?

shut up you midget gawking sick freak.

this fool got a midget fetish and needs help

[The Big Dunn]

the woman beater *floyd was an underdog early in his career wow, after that he became a vacation taking woman beating punk. your punk ass wants 40+ year old manny to fight crawford and spence yet where was the woman beater *floyd in fighting sergio or ggg?

shut up you midget gawking sick freak.

this fool got a midget fetish and needs help

Posting I have a midget fetish doesn't address the post. I don't mind that you take shots at me but I believe you have me on ignore so I would appreciate if you either didn't quote me or took me off ignore so we can discuss all topics. We all agree quoting someone you have on ignore is very weak.

I only want Manny to fight them to unify the titles in the division. If Manny didn't have a title I wouldn't advocate him fighting either. Even though I take shots at Manny I have consistently posted he can fight who he wishes. In the lead up to the Berto fight I posted several times he should fight GGG instead. You can verify this in the threads. You missed this because you had me on ignore.

I notice you didn't address the point of the post. It's fine if you don't like Floyd. It just isn't possible to review his career and say he didn't take any risks.

[Chuckguy]

Thurman -
2017) tough fight with Danny
INJURY GAP
2019) subpar performance vs Josesito

In steps Pac.

Let's play by your rules. PRIOR to Thurman......what risks ????

And do try not to be the prototypical Pac fan with your emo outbursts

Keep hating loser. Manny taking greater risks than Floyd all day errday

[hugh grant]

See how you react when facts are posted. Manny has never won any unbiased, credible best of his era polls. Not one.

Pac wins all polls when it comes to who's best of era. It's just you who claims they are biased and not credible, whilst most sensible and reasonable individuals would just conclude they are general consensus and what people instinctively feel.
People just vote for pac without the drama and theatrics and fuss you bring to the table.
You know I speak the truth.

[Real King Kong]

This thread is interesting. Both Floyd and Manny fight opponents in 70/30 type fights. There are posters that will give Manny credit for "taking a risk" and not Floyd, even though each has the same chance of winning.

Floyd defeats Corrales as an underdog and that is not considered taking a risk. Floyd fights bigger men and that isn't considered taking a risk. Yet if Manny wins as an underdog or fights a bigger man it is considered taking a risk.

How is this possible?

the odds vs corrales were negligible...if I remember correctly, Floyd opened as the favorite. that was more of a pick-em fight than anything.

[Gigantes]

the odds vs corrales were negligible...if I remember correctly, Floyd opened as the favorite. that was more of a pick-em fight than anything.

Diego Corrales +110
Floyd Mayweather Jr. -130

look at this risk taker

Henry Bruseles -2000
Shambra Mitchell -950
Carlos Baldomir -700
Miguel Cotto -700 (best weight doe)
Robert Guerrero -600
Marcos Maidana -900 (got his ass kicked and lost 7-5, the woman beaters expression after they announced the "winner" shows he didn't know he won and was shocked as well)
Andre Berto -3000 (lmao three thousand!!!)

[Gigantes]

Posting I have a midget fetish doesn't address the post. I don't mind that you take shots at me but I believe you have me on ignore so I would appreciate if you either didn't quote me or took me off ignore so we can discuss all topics. We all agree quoting someone you have on ignore is very weak.

I only want Manny to fight them to unify the titles in the division. If Manny didn't have a title I wouldn't advocate him fighting either. Even though I take shots at Manny I have consistently posted he can fight who he wishes. In the lead up to the Berto fight I posted several times he should fight GGG instead. You can verify this in the threads. You missed this because you had me on ignore.

I notice you didn't address the point of the post. It's fine if you don't like Floyd. It just isn't possible to review his career and say he didn't take any risks.

waa waa waaa shut your punk ass up, go eat a ****, bet preferably you'd want a midget ****, sick freak

ain't no one got your midget cock suckin ass on ignore the fuck u talkin bout? putting u on ignore ain't a bad idea though so i won't have to see your midget fetish avatar all the time

find a foot fetish or something else, but a midget fetish? shiiiiiieeet

[Gigantes]

Pac wins all polls when it comes to who's best of era. It's just you who claims they are biased and not credible, whilst most sensible and reasonable individuals would just conclude they are general consensus and what people instinctively feel.
People just vote for pac without the drama and theatrics and fuss you bring to the table.
You know I speak the truth.

great post

leave the punk with a midget fetish alone