Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Otto Wallin would Be Wilders Best Win.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Boxingraya View Post
    Take away the cut and Wallin gets stopped in 5. He wasn't 30 to 1 for no reason.

    Wallin had maybe two good rounds and one amazing punch. He did jack shiiiit the other 10 rounds and was teed-off on.
    That's just a made up story you got here, many guys have lasted with Fury just no one made him actually work. You guys just don't want to give credit to someone that did better then Wilder with a better version of fury.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
      Last time I challenged you to a quote you refused the actual quote for some bull**** you wrote tinkerbell. So who would be the arbitrator?

      When "I never said Tyson Fury was KO'd" is responded to with " Yes you did, on this date you said Tyson Fury was briefly KO'd" Y'all done know we need a middle man.


      At best yer gonna find a historical quote/joke you didn't know was a reference because you don't know ****. SO, I'm gonna need a knowledgeable third party to review the evidence.

      What a mook you've become.


      Oh, and BTW, when I win this ****, I'll show you just how long I've been talkin **** about Wallin while I forgive your forfeit and allow your goofy ass to stay on the forum without an alt.
      You said you never heard of Wallin and complained about the fight ,so if I find that quote you will leave the forum correct ?

      The other quote I found you said,you said wilder doesn't need Tyason fury I even put a date on it so again you want to leave the forum right ?

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Jack Napier. View Post
        Wallin isnt fast at all, not sure why you feel the need to try to hype the guy
        That's a lie and its equally ridiculous that you tell people Fury's eyes were closed when every replay shows they are wide open when he fell in the 12th. Don'yt you guys ever get tired of lying on here ? Ha

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
          You said you never heard of Wallin and complained about the fight ,so if I find that quote you will leave the forum correct ?

          The other quote I found you said,you said wilder doesn't need Tyason fury I even put a date on it so again you want to leave the forum right ?
          Um, you got spanked last time and still claim victory. I dunno wtf yer talking about. I asked for a third person to come and explain to you, you're being foolish, and it happened. How the **** do you twist that into you proving anything?


          I'll try to be very clear. You're too ****** to understand what I'm saying. Other folks don't seem to have a problem with it. When I point out I never said that, not only is it me telling you I never said that, but, a third man too. You've been out ruled and still go on about Tyson.

          The **** does Wilder doesn't need Tyson have to do with a KO? Nothing, and, everyone on the forum seems to get that but you.

          I'll leave the forum when you can follow simple english. You ain't got to prove ****, give me a single direct response ever and I'll **** right off.

          This **** right here, what i have quoted, has nothing the **** to do with what you quoted me saying. Wilder doesn't need fury? You writing that is the first time it appears on this thread. The **** do I have to do with that?

          It isn't hard to see and you're not clever. Everyone who reads other people's posts clearly read me talk about KO and you twist into "Need"....the **** is wrong with you son?

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
            That's a lie and its equally ridiculous that you tell people Fury's eyes were closed when every replay shows they are wide open when he fell in the 12th. Don'yt you guys ever get tired of lying on here ? Ha
            I posted a picture of his eyes being closed

            Comment


            • #56
              LMAO!!! Redeemer getting his azz blasted on his own thread.

              It's bad enough Fury goes life or death with a sparring partner, get's his head spit open (with a legal punch I might add), and tries to go KO on Wallin and barely makes a dent in him.

              Your threads are as featherfisted as Fury.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by W1LL View Post
                The thing is, he had power himself. He stunned Fury once or twice, and genuinely hurt him in that 12th. He is also 6ft 5.5in tall. How do you think he would get on against fringe contenders like Artur Szpilka? Carlos Takam? David Price? Charles Martin? Could make some interesting fights.
                I honestly didn't see the power. Remember Cunningham dropped Fury so the dude doesnt' have the best chin. What Fury has is good recovery an heart. I consider all those fighters journeymen, they are not contenders.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Otto puts himself on the same playing field as old man Ortiz. I wouldn't even know who wins that considering Ortiz is 50 and looked like shyte against Hammer where Wallin is improving and will be far less rusty next time.

                  I would probably tend to agree here that Wallin defeats any wilder opponent he defeated.He went in against a truly fit Fury and hit him more then anyone did. That in itself says more then what Ortiz has done, who is wilders best win.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
                    Wilder has not fought a skilled guy over 6'5 and won ,

                    Wallin brings size,speed and great ring IQ for 20 fight pro.

                    Ortiz of 2017 was still a stationary target for Wilder he likes the pocket and slows by mid rounds.

                    Wilder wouldn't be able to tire Wallin out like Fury did physically at his weight, he would really have to deck him.

                    But excluding Wilder, Ortiz is the only challenge for big tall Wallin in his 20's. Ortiz is almost 50 and when he fought Wilder he was 48 , he doesn't present the other problems Wallin does ,size, speed ,punch volume and foot work all belong to Wallin and possibly chin ?


                    Wallin would be wilders best win, he is Furys 3rd. I count Breazeale but hes slow ,he doesn't present speed and that's what cost him that fight ultimately besides getting over confident.
                    Doubtful. I would be shocked if he could beat Ortiz

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
                      That's just a made up story you got here, many guys have lasted with Fury just no one made him actually work. You guys just don't want to give credit to someone that did better then Wilder with a better version of fury.
                      I'm wondering if you weren't cut over the eye on Saturday night also. Your vision was clearly impaired.

                      Wallin landed a lucky punch that caused the cut and what else?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP