Lomachenko's Opponents Combined Record is 431-39

[Ogecca MaMa]

that's an ignorant stats that has nothing to do with boxing. you can have 50-0 by fighting bums. thats what most of boxers do when they start their pro career, fighting nobodies. aka chavez jr

[Larry the boss]

Loma is a damn good fighter, but even outside of "turning pro" at 25 the guy had pro fights after he left the Olympics

[Caxcan]

Loma is a damn good fighter, but even outside of "turning pro" at 25 the guy had pro fights after he left the Olympics

Yeah, some people act like he's some kind of prodigy for winning titles in 3 divisions in x number of fights when the guy was 30 years old.

[Larry the boss]

Yeah, some people act like he's some kind of prodigy for winning titles in 3 divisions in x number of fights when the guy was 30 years old.

naw, that is a great accomplishment...but the comparison is pretty ******

[DaNeutral.]

that's an ignorant stats that has nothing to do with boxing. you can have 50-0 by fighting bums. thats what most of boxers do when they start their pro career, fighting nobodies. aka chavez jr

Why mention Chavez Jr and look at his resume when you can just look at the resume of the fighter in question and his resume is very different to Chavez Jr so I just don't get your point.

That's funny. Those numbers without a resume can be misleading but you want to show the resume of a different fighter to prove its bollocks when if you looked at the resume of the very person the threads about the thread starter has a point.

[BoxingIsGreat]

Loma is a damn good fighter, but even outside of "turning pro" at 25 the guy had pro fights after he left the Olympics

And has a loss to a journeyman with 12 losses.

[BoxingIsGreat]

I'd never ever question anything Lomachenko does if he comes close to beating Davis, even if he can be competitive with him.

[Ogecca MaMa]

Why mention Chavez Jr and look at his resume when you can just look at the resume of the fighter in question and his resume is very different to Chavez Jr so I just don't get your point.

That's funny. Those numbers without a resume can be misleading but you want to show the resume of a different fighter to prove its bollocks when if you looked at the resume of the very person the threads about the thread starter has a point.

what the hell did you just wrote? not rereading, makes no sense lol

like i said - useless thread, with its cheerleaders

[ramses07]

Salido probably added like 20 losses to that

[b Murphington]

And has a loss to a journeyman with 12 losses.

No.

I fu#kin can’t stand it when people throw that misleading stat out there.

Orlando Salido is a damn good fighter. Far from a journeyman. He’s fought everyone he can possibly fight, has an accomplished resume, and he’s a former 2 time world champion. Does that sound like a journeyman to you? No. Salido is a tough fight for anyone he faces.

But everyone who wants to sh#t on Lomachenko throws that ****** stat out there. Besides. Who the hell fights someone as accomplished as Salido in only their 2nd pro bout? No one.

Read between the lines.