Lomachenko's Opponents Combined Record is 431-39

[Tony Trick-Pony]

turning pro at 25 is a huge difference then turning pro at 17-20 years old man

So what? Older equals better. There are plenty of guys who turn pro later and go nowhere. That's a BS point.

[b Murphington]

I disagree and your post is what I mean when I say the Loma hype is unreasonable. Loma's best win is who? Jorge Linares? Rigo? That's not #1 P4P material.

Hindsight is always 20/20. A lot of posters on here were actually picking Rigondeaux to beat Lomachenko despite Rigondeaux moving up in weight. They argued that Rigondeaux’s skill set was so good, that the size difference wouldn’t matter.

Fact of the matter is that at the time, that was a huge fight to make and at the time, Rigo was on a lot of people’s P4P list.

The Rigo win was a solid win.

[b Murphington]

Anyone who doesn't think Loma is a special boxer doesn't know what they are watching. For me, though, the hype doesn't match the competition.

Let's demand tougher fights, not compiling trinkets.

Yes I can agree with that I would like to see him get tested more.

[Lomadeaux]

Isn’t relevant enough??? He seems pretty relevant to me. When you’re almost universally ranked #1 in most P4P rankings, I’d say you’re pretty relevant.

Im not going to say he’s the best boxer we’ve ever seen or that he’s a certified ATG already, but I recognize that he’s been pretty impressive.

That dude is too far gone. Wow.

[Lomadeaux]

turning pro at 25 is a huge difference then turning pro at 17-20 years old man

Tell Benitez that.

[Lomadeaux]

Hindsight is always 20/20. A lot of posters on here were actually picking Rigondeaux to beat Lomachenko despite Rigondeaux moving up in weight. They argued that Rigondeaux’s skill set was so good, that the size difference wouldn’t matter.

Fact of the matter is that at the time, that was a huge fight to make and at the time, Rigo was on a lot of people’s P4P list.

The Rigo win was a solid win.

I picked Rigo to win.

[b Murphington]

I picked Rigo to win.

I personally did not, but I know that a lot of guys were picking him. He was not a huge underdog really.

[daggum]

the combined record of tank davis' opponents is 0-2473

[Floyd is TBE]

Hindsight is always 20/20. A lot of posters on here were actually picking Rigondeaux to beat Lomachenko despite Rigondeaux moving up in weight. They argued that Rigondeaux’s skill set was so good, that the size difference wouldn’t matter.

Fact of the matter is that at the time, that was a huge fight to make and at the time, Rigo was on a lot of people’s P4P list.

The Rigo win was a solid win.

Okay. Did you know that to this very day there are still people here who think Amir Khan would beat Floyd Mayweather? And yet Floyd beating Khan would do absolutely nothing to his enhance his legacy. People making delusional predictions doesn't change reality. I'm not a hater. I do give Loma his props, he did what he had to. But the fact of the matter is Rigo was old and extremely undersized at the time. It was a solid win for Loma but not a career defining one.

[Vodkaholic]

I agree.

One loss and they hound you with it forever, like they ever beat anybody. Haha.

Good post, man.

A tWo diViSion chaMp liKe Salidoe a bum doe. ****chicken lost his second professional fight. He ah bum