That's your best refutation? Calling someone a 5 year old? Its ok I'll accept your tacit acknowledgement that your taking an L on this one.
So according to your logic, GGG is fighting Jacobs “Leftovers”? And he should get no credit if he beats him? Sorry kid but you think just like a 5 year old
That's your best refutation? Calling someone a 5 year old? Its ok I'll accept your tacit acknowledgement that your taking an L on this one.
So according to your logic, GGG is fighting Jacobs “Leftovers”? And he should get no credit if he beats him? Sorry kid but the way you processes information is that of a 5 year old child
LMAO yea most media and experts scored it that way, but you have it right...…..OK. BTW nobody pulls my strings that's the way I SCORED it, it just so happens that most agree with me. I was nice with your last BS post, but now I see your just a fanboy who will NEVER get it. Good bye and have a great(so fricken glad its not my) life. As with most kids I'm sure you will need the last word so have at it lol.
Round by round with the punches landed & the time on the round that the punch landed.
It's not crazy to have the fight 7-5 in either direction or another draw. 8-4 for either is too much but he didn't definitely lose it. He swept all 4 of the last rounds for me so it's not too much to think he could've won a round or 2 before that. Feldman had him winning the last 4 too. The 12th should've been his round on all 3 but only Feldman saw him win. If he wins the 12th on at least 1 other card, we have a another MD.
Its on the wide side for GGG no doubt but a few legit boxing people had it 8-4. F#cking Harold Lederman had it 8-4 & hes the mfer who often over rewards aggression which is what Canelo exceled at in the rematch.
Thats how effective GGG's jab was that night to many mfers. To me the jab gave GGG rounds more than Canelo's aggression won rounds.
And "most definitely" he Canelo won cuz the official decision was a majority decision for Canelo, but that doesnt change the fact most everyone had the fight so close a round or two would alter the winner & most had GGG winning so the consensus by fans was once again the wrong outcome was given in this fight not unlike the first fight where the official draw was deemed a unofficial W for GGG by most watching the fight. Thats just the f#cking reality no matter what the minority that scored one or both fights for Canelo wanna suggest.
Thats why I dont get this acting like GGG is old news now despite Canelo not clearly winning either fight & both outcomes being viewed as bad outcomes both f#cking times. I really thought Canelo was gonna win both fights myself. And I think too many knuckleheads are hyped up by how Canelo fought in the 2nd fight than how effective he actually was. GGG's jab was the best thing happening in that 2nd fight to my own surprise.
You full of shet. You can't score a fight, hell do you even know how to box?!?!
So which is it fishnets? Is it “earn his spot again” or “present offers to several opponents to see who fights Canelo”? The middleweight division is loaded but a #2 guy has nowhere else to climb but a trilogy. Canelo should dominate a flat footed ba5tard like GGG 7 days a week but hasn’t been able to and that is why fishnets wants no trilogy. GGG simply presents too much of a challenge to want to do it a third time. This is Tito Trinidad and Oscar ascending in weight all over again. Canelo has a mountain to climb against Kovalev and that’s too big of a bite to chew. A GGG trilogy won’t matter after that if he doesn’t win.
Nelo beat Pvssy-G twice already & he is not a challenge to someone who can box.
Tweet
Comment