The media and boxing world did not see Jacobs as a star nor was there a huge controversy about the outcome, nor was the rematch considered a superfight. Huge difference. And the fact is, GGG did not turn up dirty on a test, period. Only a fool would believe that if GGG had turned up dirty that the boxing world would not have been in outrage.
Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: GGG Has To 'Earn His Spot' To Get Canelo Trilogy!
Collapse
-
Is it that really or is that there isn’t an objective Canelo fan on this site?
Do you honestly believe you are an objective boxing fan?Comment
-
No controversy because the media didn't make one but that fight is controversial. The difference is people like yourself only go by what the media says.The media and boxing world did not see Jacobs as a star nor was there a huge controversy about the outcome, nor was the rematch considered a superfight. Huge difference. And the fact is, GGG did not turn up dirty on a test, period. Only a fool would believe that if GGG had turned up dirty that the boxing world would not have been in outrage.Comment
-
-
I dont go by what the media says, the boxing public and media both dictate what is a high velocity match vs a match with only one star. I will repeat this again, only a FOOL would believe that the boxing world would not be in a huge outage if GGG had tested dirty! Your original statement COMPLETELY ignored the fact that Canelo's image took a sht storm hit when he turned up dirty. Let me know if GGG turns up dirty, till then NO comparison. End of discussion.Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes you do you just said it, the media "dictates" who they want to make a star or at least try to which is what they did with ggg thats what I said too the difference is some believe the bullsht some don't. As for canelo taking a "sht storm" thats good I never said it wasnt. I said the media overhyped ggg and are never critical of him for anything...fanboys just get offended when someone criticizes their idol.I dont go by what the media says, the boxing public and media both dictate what is a high velocity match vs a match with only one star. I will repeat this again, only a FOOL would believe that the boxing world would not be in a huge outage if GGG had tested dirty! Your original statement COMPLETELY ignored the fact that Canelo's image took a sht storm hit when he turned up dirty. Let me know if GGG turns up dirty, till then NO comparison. End of discussion.Comment
-
If he (Alvrez) came forward the whole fight, how do you account for the fact that Golovkin's back never touched the ropes?
In fact it was Alvarez whose back touched the ropes in the late rounds.Comment
-
Stop acting ******! I never said who they want to make a star! YOU SAID that Canelo gets more negative press IGNORING THE FACT that Canelo was the one who turned up dirty, NOT GGG! I said the MEDIA and boxing public determine superfights, I said nothing about who they want to make a star! Everyone knows the difference between a huge fight and a lessor fight. The fact is, everyone was more interested in seeing GGG vs Canelo than either of those guys against anyone else! That is why people wanted to see Canelo vs GGG FAR more than Canelo vs anyone else and the same reason why people wanted to see GGG vs Canelo FAR more than the Jacobs rematch. That is a fact, live with it. NO YOU DID NOT say in our conversation that the media overhyped GGG, that was NOT the debate!!!! Go back and read! You said Canelo gets more criticism from the press and I said THAT IS BECAUSE he is the one who turned up dirty, NOT GGG. If GGG had turned up dirty, he would have had a far worse image! Again, end of debate!Yes you do you just said it, the media "dictates" who they want to make a star or at least try to which is what they did with ggg thats what I said too the difference is some believe the bullsht some don't. As for canelo taking a "sht storm" thats good I never said it wasnt. I said the media overhyped ggg and are never critical of him for anything...fanboys just get offended when someone criticizes their idol.Last edited by richardt; 09-11-2019, 01:26 PM.Comment
Comment