Hearn says Whyte has a hearing in Oct & he already knows the outcome

[kafkod]

Well thats just it in the USA they don't allow fighters to fight without the other fighter knowing about an opponents dirty test ,& they don't have commissions doing testing because VADA tests fighters nowadays(& doesn't normally have to split testing duties & coordinate like it does in the Uk) & if they are caught then the opponents are told as are the sanctioning org who flunk the fighter out of their program & withdraw sanctioning of the bout.

How can you possibly agree with this bs from Whyte/Hearn especially considering all the sht they were talking about other fighters & what ****** supposed pos they were?

VADA don't split testing duties with UKAD for UK fights. They are paid to conduct random pre fight tests, and they do what they are paid to do without any interference from UKAD.

Whyte passed a VADA test 2 days before his failed UKAD test. How could that have happened if VADA and UKAD were splitting their testing duties?

[kushking]

VADA don't split testing duties with UKAD for UK fights. They are paid to conduct random pre fight tests, and they do what they are paid to do without any interference from UKAD.

Whyte passed a VADA test 2 days before his failed UKAD test. How could that have happened if VADA and UKAD were splitting their testing duties?

I keep hearing that he was tested by vada days earlier,yet we the public don't know the specifics of anything whatsoever other than listening to the accused & nobody of authority directly on the matter?(if I'm mistaken then please I allow yourself to retort indubitably,cheerio old chap

And without that direct info on the specifics its all an exercise in futility. To top it off Just because he was popped days after vada tested him last, doesn't mean hes clean because he could've thought he was in the clear til the fight, took a cycle,& flushed with new age methods. Especially without specific amounts of substances in his test, method of tests etc. though its pointless to speculate other than the known available facts which are:

Surely vada & Ukad can't test on same day or too often for blood so there must be coordination otherwise they'd be putting fighters in danger of infection in the blood draw case,& with urine it'd be considered excessive afaik.

Whyte is shamelessly refusing to defend his innocence & has never so much as even simply stated hes not taken peds(implying he was worried hed get caught with more dirty tests afterwards like Miller did after crying innocence & using race card). Hearn is acting worse than one of the presidents aids during the watergate scandal. And

[ShaneMosleySr]

Because he failed a VADA test and not a state drug test.

Whyte failed a UKAD test and was allowed to fight.

So how is the NYSAC the corrupt one?

The commissions didn't prevent him, Joshua pulled out, they didn't punish him either. The WBA gave him a 6 month suspension.

[ShaneMosleySr]

They do punish fighters. Why wasn’t Canelo allowed to fight GGG on May 5 a couple years back. Because he failed a drug test.

US commissions don't do random testing and they don't punish fighters. All the idiots on here cry about UKAD though.

[ShaneMosleySr]

Dillian Whyte failed a drug test and was allowed to fight. We would have never known if Hauser didn’t break the story.

How is that okay?

Miller was popped in 3 VADA tests for 3 different substances. Whyte passed all his VADA tests, and one of them was taken just 2 days before his failed UKAD test.

He was cleared to fight by an independent legal/medical tribunal, not by UKAD.

[kafkod]

Dillian Whyte failed a drug test and was allowed to fight. We would have never known if Hauser didn’t break the story.

How is that okay?

Because he appealed against the test result, which he was entitled to do, and because he had passed a VADA test which came up negative for the same substance just 2 days previously, the independent legal/medical tribunal which rules on all UK doping cases held an emergency hearing, looked at the evidence, and cleared him to fight.

If he was juiced up, then why did VADA clear him in every test they took during the same period as the UKAD tests?

If he is guilty, then who is more at fault, UKAD for catching him and trying to suspend him - which we would have known about, because the fight would have been called off - or VADA for passing him as clean?

[LetOutTheCage]

Miller wasn’t allowed to fight and Whyte was.

Says who exactly?

[ShaneMosleySr]

I love the argument that he was cleared because he passed a drug test just days before failing a drug test.

He failed a drug test. It was ignored. He was allowed to fight. The opponent was never informed.

UKAD is more at fault because he failed their drug test and they let it go. VADA doesn’t look good either.

Because he appealed against the test result, which he was entitled to do, and because he had passed a VADA test which came up negative for the same substance just 2 days previously, the independent legal/medical tribunal which rules on all UK doping cases held an emergency hearing, looked at the evidence, and cleared him to fight.

If he was juiced up, then why did VADA clear him in every test they took during the same period as the UKAD tests?

If he is guilty, then who is more at fault, UKAD for catching him and trying to suspend him - which we would have known about, because the fight would have been called off - or VADA for passing him as clean?

[ShaneMosleySr]

Whyte was allowed to fight.

Miller didn’t even bother applying for his boxing license and the Joshua camp moved on to Ruiz.

Says who exactly?

[kafkod]

I love the argument that he was cleared because he passed a drug test just days before failing a drug test.

He failed a drug test. It was ignored. He was allowed to fight. The opponent was never informed.

UKAD is more at fault because he failed their drug test and they let it go. VADA doesn’t look good either.

UKAD didn't let it go.

They tried to suspend him, which would have prevented him from fighting, and he appealed against the suspension and was then cleared to fight by an independent tribunal who are not part of UKAD or the BBBoC.