Michael Zerafa does what Manny & Crawford failed to do: CLEARLY beat Horn. Respeck

[tophat1]

Poor effort at trolling mentioning Crawford. He dominated him

[thedarkdragon11]

Crawford beat him, a sleeping GrandPac dominated him...

/thread

[Bullrider]

Manny Pacquiao has ruined this poster's life, like many others.

He's been obsessed with trying to prove this Pacquiao guy is a hoax for decades now.

Yet his expectations for him reaches to high heavens. The judges awarded the fight to Horn, yet he's still not satisfied.

[FrankieClutch]

Crawford beat the hell out of Horn. TF are you talking about?

[Combat Talk Radio]

ok, list is updated. Now, let's be clear here.

Horn was stopped by Crawford ON HIS FEET. Horn was hit by Crawford but NOWHERE NEAR as dominantly as what Zerafa just did to him.

Now, that's on the ref in the Crawford fight. But the point is, Zerafa had Horn down in the second round, pummeled with CLEAR head pop backs, roughed up on the ropes, roughed up on the ground, etc. Zerafa FINISHED STRONG. Zerafa finished in a way that gets people talking about him as a fighter. That's what I expect from every fighter. Crawford hasn't done that at 147. He did 140. That's my complaint with him. HE should have done what Zerafa done - a full on beating over all 9 rounds, not a trigger happy ref.

As far as Mr. Pacquiao, he in no way came close to Zerafa's performance against Horn was because he was afraid of Horn when he didn't need to be. He could have done that and didn't. That's my problem with him. Then he ducked the rematch.


Summary: Michael Zerafa…

[Richard G]

Yes, Zerafa did to Horn what Packy was not able to do, he wrecked him and KO'd him and in a manner more thorough than Crawford did.

[Cadet Bonespurs]

So you saying Zerafa can beat Crawford now?

What are you getting at?


:

[Cadet Bonespurs]

ok, list is updated. Now, let's be clear here.

Horn was stopped by Crawford ON HIS FEET. Horn was hit by Crawford but NOWHERE NEAR as dominantly as what Zerafa just did to him.

Now, that's on the ref in the Crawford fight. But the point is, Zerafa had Horn down in the second round, pummeled with CLEAR head pop backs, roughed up on the ropes, roughed up on the ground, etc. Zerafa FINISHED STRONG. Zerafa finished in a way that gets people talking about him as a fighter. That's what I expect from every fighter. Crawford hasn't done that at 147. He did 140. That's my complaint with him. HE should have done what Zerafa done - a full on beating over all 9 rounds, not a trigger happy ref.

As far as Mr. Pacquiao, he in no way came close to Zerafa's performance against Horn was because he was afraid of Horn when he didn't need to be. He could have done that and didn't. That's my problem with him. Then he ducked the rematch.


Summary: Michael Zerafa…

You have a problem with him not wrecking Horn?

Who is Horn, some sort of litmus test for greatness?


This post and thread is the dumbest thing I’ve read today

[IceTrayDaGang]

horn was already damaged from the pac fight.

[Combat Talk Radio]

So you saying Zerafa can beat Crawford now?

What are you getting at?

Fairly certain Zerafa is too damn big to be fighting Crawford, first of all. Second, if Crawford fought that dude in Australia, he's losing that '0' for sure. Whatever fight sanctioning bodies out there just don't give a F about rules; you can get as rough as you want without warnings or point deductions. Crawford would be a bloody mess and stopped inside 10 rounds.

I'm giving credit to Michael Zerafa for FIGHTING better than everyone's so-called P4P, better than Manny Pacquiao, against a common opponent. I said it before. I don't like asterisks. There were none this night.