Comments Thread For: Danny Garcia: I'm Ready Fight To Pacquiao; Great Match For Me

[RuleOfTheSpear]

No. Doing what is best for the division is the right thing to do. Doing what is easiest for Manny is not part of the equation.

Porter/Spence are fighting next. Manny should fight the winner after given the network politics. In a perfect world, we'd have a semi final matchup of Porter/Spence and Manny/Crawford with the winners fighting.

Floyd has nothing to do with this discussion.

In order to unify the division, any of the ww's should have to beat 2 of the other titleholders. No one is asking Manny to beat them all so there is no need for you to lie.

I gave 2 scenarios. In one, Manny fight the winner of Porter/Spence, without fighting anyone before, and then the winner fights Crawford. In the other he fights Crawford because Manny is seen as the #3 ww and Crawford #2 and the winner fights the winner of Spence (#1)/Porter (#4).

Lmfao why Crawford has the easiest route meanwhile all PBC fighters have the hardest route?

What a diva

[RuleOfTheSpear]

Those guys are bums fighting bums. Crawford shouldn't even have a belt and Manny should have 2. Danny has a way better resume than those 2 combined but Manny will take Spence/Porter winner and keep proving people wrong... Over and over again!

[The Big Dunn]

What?!? It was a scam bc it was a low ball . Manny and Floyd knew it hence why Manny made 120mil+ ?? Do u know what a scam is? Maybe u don't which is why u like Floyd lol cheap shot I know.. and Manny still had losses on his record so ur point is still moot.

Ok so you are posting what's best for the division and for the sport correct?

My point still stands. Floyd fighting Berto and Connor was not good for the sport. They were good business choices. Floyd even admits these things.

Manny should fight to unify but if he doesn't I won't have a problem with it , he's accomplished enough just like floyd

Either way whatever Manny made has no bearing on what you posted. You described him as a fighter when discussing Floyd beating him. Had he taken the $40 mil, he wouldn't of been that. That is a fact.

Yes, I posted it would be best for the sport and for the division if we had the top 4 ww's square off and the winners fight for the undisputed lineal title and 4 belts. How can you disagree with that?

I didn't post Floyd/berto was good for the sport. I explained why I felt Floyd/conor was. Yes the Floyd/conor fight was a great business decision.

You could've just posted that from the beginning.

For the record, despite all of your lies, race baiting, silly BS, deflection to Floyd, and bringing up things that had no bearing, you agree with my initial post that Manny should fight the spence/porter winner next and then Crawford.

I guess you are lonely today and needed someone to converse with.

[The Big Dunn]

Lmfao why Crawford has the easiest route meanwhile all PBC fighters have the hardest route?

What a diva

I matched them up based on ww ranking. It wasn't designed to give anyone an easier road than anyone else.

[RuleOfTheSpear]

I matched them up based on ww ranking. It wasn't designed to give anyone an easier road than anyone else.

TBRB has Manny at #1, Spence at #2, and Crawford at #3

So based on that ranking, Spence/Porter winner should fight Crawford.

TBRB awards the lineal titles, not your ****** little boxrec

[The Big Dunn]

TBRB has Manny at #1, Spence at #2, and Crawford at #3

So based on that ranking, Spence/Porter winner should fight Crawford.

TBRB awards the lineal titles, not your ****** little boxrec

I don't use boxrec. I didn't know TBRB had the rankings like this. If it was Manny/porter and Spence/Crawford semis that would be fine as well.

Either way, Danny/manny is a waste at this point IMO given the context.

[Pennstate110]

Either way whatever Manny made has no bearing on what you posted. You described him as a fighter when discussing Floyd beating him. Had he taken the $40 mil, he wouldn't of been that. That is a fact.

Yes, I posted it would be best for the sport and for the division if we had the top 4 ww's square off and the winners fight for the undisputed lineal title and 4 belts. How can you disagree with that?

I didn't post Floyd/berto was good for the sport. I explained why I felt Floyd/conor was. Yes the Floyd/conor fight was a great business decision.

You could've just posted that from the beginning.

For the record, despite all of your lies, race baiting, silly BS, deflection to Floyd, and bringing up things that had no bearing, you agree with my initial post that Manny should fight the spence/porter winner next and then Crawford.

I guess you are lonely today and needed someone to converse with.

I just said Manny had losses prior to the 40mil?!?!

I never disagreed with Manny unifying.

My point was if we're not going to be critical of Floyd for fighting Berto and Connor then let's not critical of Manny for fighting dsg. Do we want him to unify, absolutely.

No im actually working lol and the same can be said for u as u we're on this comment section long before I was....mAh brothaaaaaaa

[Gigantes]

lol u know someone is an idiot when they make crawford #2 WW just because he beat khan and horn

[j.razor]

Danny lost two in a row to Thurman and then to Porter. Am I'm right! He got no belt and nothing to offer! Pacquiao should fight the winner of Spence or Porter. Or sorry ass Floyd in a big money fight.
It all about that money!
No money with weak ass Danny.
It more money with Mikey than Danny.
But leave those Garcia's men fights alone. Fights for money and the IBF belt.
Thurman and Porter both beat Danny ass! Right!
Spence beat Mikey ass!
Beat the men that beat the bums! Pacquiao is 40 now fight smart! No Arum now fight smart!

Wrong. He lost to Keith then beat Rios. He has a good following & a name to offer which equals $. I doubt Manny wants to enter the ring with Errol too. T.B.E. is retired & it seems you the sorry one for placing bets against him for the past 20 years.

[The Big Dunn]

I just said Manny had losses prior to the 40mil?!?!

I never disagreed with Manny unifying.

My point was if we're not going to be critical of Floyd for fighting Berto and Connor then let's not critical of Manny for fighting dsg. Do we want him to unify, absolutely.

No im actually working lol and the same can be said for u as u we're on this comment section long before I was....mAh brothaaaaaaa

No, you described him far worse, suggesting his being knocked out diminished him.

I was critical of Floyd fighting Berto saying it was done solely so Floyd could remain undefeated to set up fight #50. So you have no reason to criticize me posting danny/many is a waste right now.

You literally have no reason to criticizing anything I've posted because you believe the exact same thing.