Canelo Alvarez Popularity Decreasing Since Joining DAZN (Proof)

[DaNeutral.]

Lololololololol some shilling going on here baby. Nobody takes this fangimp seriously.

Apart from other fangimp ofcourse.

[Southpawology]

HBO vs. DAZN

https://trends.google.com/trends/exp...=Daniel jacobs

So youre showing trends for a network thats been around for 30 years VS a network that hasnt even been in the US market for one year??

Brilliant.

[lolpz]

I don't even wanna get into the specifics of Canelo or the actual graph image.

If you're a boxing fan to the point where you make an account on a boxing forum or just a real boxing fan period. I don't understand why you would want to see Dazn fail. I'm just speaking in general for detractors. There's literally a whole network of fighters who would could be in limbo if Dazn didn’t exist. Which means: fighters would be less active & their purses would probably be less or less money to go around. Which ultimately as a fighter we know is most important.

Boxing is literally a broke ass sport. The fans & fighters in it are forever complaining about money. Shìt is sad. Dazn may not have the best stable, may or may not be putting on the best fights but one thing that's undoubtable is they have about 5 fighters who at least have p4p potential & are better individually than majority of other networks fighters.

If Dazn can't sustain itself you're missing out on a platform that has invested greatly into boxing. You can't monopolize the sport. HBO is gone, not 1 PBC platform or ESPN has the budget to monopolize it even if they wanted to! No 1 platform can pay all these fighters the type of money they want. So if you're cheering for Dazn's failure in a sport you "like or love." You're not only removing 1 of it's 4 major networks but you're also removing the ability for these fighters to have a platform to showcase their skillset. Which means you don't want the sport to flourish...

Good post, you're just missing the fact that these posters are agenda based and look to trash their favorite fighter's rival so they can "win" arguments on NSB against other people.

They don't view the sport of boxing collectively to see the best fights get made, their brains aren't wired that way. I don't think they have the IQ to view the sport as a whole and wish success for every platform.

[Thuglife Nelo]

According to google trends, Canelo's popularity has been diminishing since joining DAZN. His fight against Chavez Jr back in 2017 got more attention than his fights against Fielding and Jacobs combined. More evidence that DAZN is bad for boxing!

If you actually comprehend graphs, first, those are what we call “peaks” for particular fights.

Canelo vs GGG is what everyone wanted, those are bonafide peaks.

[paulf]

You're an idiot and you need to retake high school statistics.

You have to control for all the other major factors that would contribute to those spikes (name value of opponent, when the fight is taking place, where, etc etc) before drawing anything near that conclusion.

But since you don't understand anything, let me help you: type "Golovkin" into Google trends and compare March 2017 (Golovkin-Jacobs) vs September 2017 (Canelo-Golovkin).

Was Golovkin on DAZN when he fought Jacobs? No.

Log off, go for a walk and reflect.

[HandSpeed303]

I don't even wanna get into the specifics of Canelo or the actual graph image.

If you're a boxing fan to the point where you make an account on a boxing forum or just a real boxing fan period. I don't understand why you would want to see Dazn fail. I'm just speaking in general for detractors. There's literally a whole network of fighters who would could be in limbo if Dazn didn’t exist. Which means: fighters would be less active & their purses would probably be less or less money to go around. Which ultimately as a fighter we know is most important.

Boxing is literally a broke ass sport. The fans & fighters in it are forever complaining about money. Shìt is sad. Dazn may not have the best stable, may or may not be putting on the best fights but one thing that's undoubtable is they have about 5 fighters who at least have p4p potential & are better individually than majority of other networks fighters.

If Dazn can't sustain itself you're missing out on a platform that has invested greatly into boxing. You can't monopolize the sport. HBO is gone, not 1 PBC platform or ESPN has the budget to monopolize it even if they wanted to! No 1 platform can pay all these fighters the type of money they want. So if you're cheering for Dazn's failure in a sport you "like or love." You're not only removing 1 of it's 4 major networks but you're also removing the ability for these fighters to have a platform to showcase their skillset. Which means you don't want the sport to flourish...

Great post.

[HandSpeed303]

Good post, you're just missing the fact that these posters are agenda based and look to trash their favorite fighter's rival so they can "win" arguments on NSB against other people.

They don't view the sport of boxing collectively to see the best fights get made, their brains aren't wired that way. I don't think they have the IQ to view the sport as a whole and wish success for every platform.

Another great post.

[Thuglife Nelo]

I don't even wanna get into the specifics of Canelo or the actual graph image.

If you're a boxing fan to the point where you make an account on a boxing forum or just a real boxing fan period. I don't understand why you would want to see Dazn fail. I'm just speaking in general for detractors. There's literally a whole network of fighters who would could be in limbo if Dazn didn’t exist. Which means: fighters would be less active & their purses would probably be less or less money to go around. Which ultimately as a fighter we know is most important.

Boxing is literally a broke ass sport. The fans & fighters in it are forever complaining about money. Shìt is sad. Dazn may not have the best stable, may or may not be putting on the best fights but one thing that's undoubtable is they have about 5 fighters who at least have p4p potential & are better individually than majority of other networks fighters.

If Dazn can't sustain itself you're missing out on a platform that has invested greatly into boxing. You can't monopolize the sport. HBO is gone, not 1 PBC platform or ESPN has the budget to monopolize it even if they wanted to! No 1 platform can pay all these fighters the type of money they want. So if you're cheering for Dazn's failure in a sport you "like or love." You're not only removing 1 of it's 4 major networks but you're also removing the ability for these fighters to have a platform to showcase their skillset. Which means you don't want the sport to flourish...

the Thread starter agenda, like many LDBC based groups (a collective that have a huge pool of black American followers), like to sell the idea that everyone is envious of Haymon and therefore everyone or anything else in boxing is the enemy. This is the world of Alex Jones fellowship and Farrakhan followers to always blame the “other races.”

If Skipper were African American I assure the LDBC would be rooting for DAZN.

[TrueBox]

I doubt Canelo gives two sh17s about DAZN being good/bad for boxing. One thing is certain. DAZN is ***** good for his pocket.

[rolshans]

So youre showing trends for a network thats been around for 30 years VS a network that hasnt even been in the US market for one year??

Brilliant.

The graph I shared actually shows DAZN outperforming HBO!

Showing that we can all find statistics to support our side and that the OP is being disingenuous.