Comments Thread For: Hearn: Ruiz Can't Moan About Neutral Venue For Joshua Rematch

[Marchegiano]

Lol so you couldn't answer a simple question and continue to deflect, I never once mentioned Joshua here but nice trying to lie and put words in my mouth.

keep telling yourself that there are no home advantages in the US you delusional gimp.

Yeah, **** broken or some ****. I don't think dude meant to quote me with that response and I did not mean to quote you....hopefully you is the right fella when I click post.

[LetOutTheCage]

[QUOTE=Marchegiano;20019039]

You can just say nana nana boo boo stick yer head in doo doo and it'd be pretty much the same response.

Childish, close minded, and nothing more.

Childish is believing your country is corruption free and there are no home decisions. I'm not naive like you and the other moron...

[LetOutTheCage]

[QUOTE=Marchegiano;20019051]

I dunno what's going on with the quote system.

I don't really care about the specific names y'all're talking about. My point is very simple. Every single time there's a scorecard fans don't agree with they rationalize the score with corruption rather than alternative perspective from an actual expert.

You can point to which ever fights you think were most corrupt, I don't really give a ****, doesn't actually change my point at all. It hardly even addresses it.

Here's something, if I look at your history with controversial calls specifically will I ever see you talking about the judge's perspective or will I only find more crying about corruption?

So there are no home decisions in boxing? Specifically i'm referring to the US yes or no? I asked the other moron but he wouldnt answer so I ask you the same question...

[Marchegiano]

[QUOTE=LetOutTheCage;20019067]

Childish is believing your country is corruption free and there are no home decisions. I'm not naive like you and the other moron...

Where and when did I say that?

I understand, I come in a bit nitpicky in the middle of a convo and you're just assuming since I challenged an aspect I'm gearing up to challenge more? Cool, but no, the beginning and end is all there. That's how I feel about corruption across the board. Often cried about, hardly ever proven, and rationalization is always sidestepped for emotional response.


For someone who accuses others of ducking points you sure ducked quite a few.


Everyone cries corruption and uses the fights they think were judged poorly as their evidence. You're all a bunch of babies really.

[LetOutTheCage]

[QUOTE=Marchegiano;20019090]

Where and when did I say that?

I understand, I come in a bit nitpicky in the middle of a convo and you're just assuming since I challenged an aspect I'm gearing up to challenge more? Cool, but no, the beginning and end is all there. That's how I feel about corruption across the board. Often cried about, hardly ever proven, and rationalization is always sidestepped for emotional response.


For someone who accuses others of ducking points you sure ducked quite a few.


Everyone cries corruption and uses the fights they think were judged poorly as their evidence. You're all a bunch of babies really.

Are there no home decisions yes or no? you say im crying because I believe home decisions are a real thing? Yes lets just believe that the sport which has been known to have connection with the mob and proven corruption is somehow simply down to poor refs. SMH at this ******ity

[Marchegiano]

[QUOTE=LetOutTheCage;20019104]

Are there no home decisions yes or no? you say im crying because I believe home decisions are a real thing? Yes lets just believe that the sport which has been known to have connection with the mob and proven corruption is somehow simply down to poor refs. SMH at this ******ity

I don't know why youse who really don't know history ever site history. Anyone who knows me even a little will tell you I'm not the cat to play history with; I will bury you in information son. Don't play unless you're ready to read.

My personal opinion of the home team? Of course home decisions happen, who ever said that equates to corruption? You don't need bribes for the home team to get the nod child.

What the judges say they are scoring based off of is codified in boxing. That's why the Horn win over Pac got scored twice and twice they gave it to Horn. Judges' bias is part of boxing, period and end of. So, unless you have some money changing hands or some **** like that to show me then yes, you're just crying over spilled milk.

Are their two different style at play in the matches? Fury and Wilder box similarly? Alright then stfu and quit crying until you have something of substance to cry about because all you actually need for that is puncher favoritism and if the judges favored punching guess what kiddo? That's by the book not corruption.

Show me some proof of corruption and I'll concede a corrupt fight. Godfrey beat the **** outta Carnera and lost on a DQ. It was a corrupt fight though, Carnera's team had paid off all involved including Godfrey himself. That's corruption son. The judges judging in favor of a draw in a fight whose punch count leader ended with a handful of punches ahead over twelve and took two KDs is very much fair and by the book. You'd see that if you weren't so ignorant and emotional at the same damn time.

[LetOutTheCage]

[QUOTE=Marchegiano;20019394]

I don't know why youse who really don't know history ever site history. Anyone who knows me even a little will tell you I'm not the cat to play history with; I will bury you in information son.

Alright kid whatever you say. I'm glad you agreed that home decisions are thing and that was my point...