Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Team Pulev To Appeal IBF Ruling As Ruiz Stalls On Joshua Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
    Are you ****** or dumb?

    Pulev is the mandatory.

    Hearn & Co were dragging their feet on scheduling the fight

    Pulev files a petition to enforce his mandatory

    IBF gives Ruiz an exemption with the promise of the winner fighting Pulev by May 2020 as long as the fight takes place by Dec 7

    If the fight doesn't take place by Dec 7 Ruiz and Pulev must come to an agreement within the time frame set by the IBF or a purse bid is called and if Ruiz doesn't participate he gets stripped
    You're lying. The Pulev fight isn't due until next year it has no barring on the current fight . Joshua doesn't make the mandos happen that's the sanctioning bodies job and they have a bad history with Pulev dropping out of fights they aren't going to do any favors and will grant AJ his title fight they signed on to.

    If the fight doesn't take place by the deadline Joshua gets an interm title fight.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
      Are you ****** or dumb?

      Pulev is the mandatory.

      Hearn & Co were dragging their feet on scheduling the fight

      Pulev files a petition to enforce his mandatory

      IBF gives Ruiz an exemption with the promise of the winner fighting Pulev by May 2020 as long as the fight takes place by Dec 7

      If the fight doesn't take place by Dec 7 Ruiz and Pulev must come to an agreement within the time frame set by the IBF or a purse bid is called and if Ruiz doesn't participate he gets stripped
      Pulev doesn't replace Joshua if fault of the fight not happening is Ruiz you F'ing moron and that will be decided by the championship committee.

      If the fight doesn't take place by a set date its either Ruiz has faked an injury or hes dropped the titles. It wont matter he CANT fight anyone with the restrictions placed on him that is effective NOW

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
        You're lying. The Pulev fight isn't due until next year it has no barring on the current fight . Joshua doesn't make the mandos happen that's the sanctioning bodies job and they have a bad history with Pulev dropping out of fights they aren't going to do any favors and will grant AJ his title fight they signed on to.

        If the fight doesn't take place by the deadline Joshua gets an interm title fight.
        Riddle me this. If his mandatory isn't due until next year why is the IBF granting Ruiz an exemption to fight Joshua in December? Ruiz wouldn't need an exemption if Pulev's mandatory wasn't due until next year

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
          Pulev doesn't replace Joshua if fault of the fight not happening is Ruiz you F'ing moron and that will be decided by the championship committee.

          If the fight doesn't take place by a set date its either Ruiz has faked an injury or hes dropped the titles.
          If Ruiz and Joshua do not fight by Dec 7 then the IBF will call the mandatory for Ruiz v. Pulev. If they can't come to an agreement they'll call a purse bid. If the fight doesn't happen Ruiz will be stripped and the next two highest contenders will fight for it

          We just saw this same thing happen with Canelo and the IBF. They had the deadline to make the fight. They didn't. Canelo got stripped. Now GGG & Dervychenko are fighting for the vacant title

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
            If Ruiz and Joshua do not fight by Dec 7 then the IBF will call the mandatory for Ruiz v. Pulev. If they can't come to an agreement they'll call a purse bid. If the fight doesn't happen Ruiz will be stripped and the next two highest contenders will fight for it

            We just saw this same thing happen with Canelo and the IBF. They had the deadline to make the fight. They didn't. Canelo got stripped. Now GGG & Dervychenko are fighting for the vacant title
            This another lie. The mandatory does not go over an already signed bout agreed upon by the IBF and they would have sued Hearn for his press conference ,the belts are frozen right now in this fight ,its why Ruiz cant fight another fighter with them,this is just dumb and sorry but you are to if you don't understand this yet.

            For more then one sanctioning body to be up for grabs with multiple belts the other sanctions have to comply and give the O.K individually on their own so no they are binded to the contract that was given to them there will be no mando that overrides a Joshua title fight unless Ruiz wants to drop the belts.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
              So Arum gets no blame in this for having his fighter file a petition to enforce the mandatory?

              My personal opinion is I'm not blaming Pulev for wanting his shot. But since you think it's wrong then Arum should get some blame right?



              Have you found the video of LDBC fighters saying they're paid by PBC?
              have you found the video of the paid off writers getting their airfare paid by top rank?

              Arum wouldn’t get any blame. How could he? The IBF specifically said the rematch has to be by December 14th and then Pulev would be next by the end of May.

              So that is all set except Ruiz is now balking at fighting AJ in that time frame. So this is 100% Haymon and Ruiz’s fault. No fault of Pulev Arum, Usyk etc. Andy just needs to honor the contract he signed and that Haymon agreed too

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by BigStomps View Post
                Not at all Man! You are totally wrong here!
                The thing is that Eddie Hearn says that Andy Ruiz signed a contract stating that Eddie Hearn and AJ can choose the location for a rematch in case Andy win's....
                So Andy basically agreed to let Eddie and AJ choose the location when he signed the contract.
                Now Andy Ruiz has been saying that he's the A side and that he wants the rematch in the USA or in Mexico but we haven't heard Andy Ruiz deny that he signed the contract that states Eddie can choose the location for the rematch.
                So all I'm saying is that if Andy signed the contract then he should honor it. That's all I'm saying!
                It has nothing to do with hating on Al Haymon or PBC.
                He acknowledged that he has to rematch Joshua. However the rematch contract isn't a full fight contract, just the principle issues. Ruiz still has to sign the contract that says where to be, what time, what pressers he has to show up to etc.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
                  He acknowledged that he has to rematch Joshua. However the rematch contract isn't a full fight contract, just the principle issues. Ruiz still has to sign the contract that says where to be, what time, what pressers he has to show up to etc.
                  This is a lie. The IBF would never allow a press conference that confirms the event with real press release and reporters there. That's just dumb ,I contract and signatures from both sides would be needed for the IBF and others to let that go ahead otherwise its fraud...don't you guys have an education ? Do you know what fraud is ? wow. Ha

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
                    This another lie. The mandatory does not go over an already signed bout agreed upon by the IBF and they would have sued Hearn for his press conference ,the belts are frozen right now in this fight ,its why Ruiz cant fight another fighter with them,this is just dumb and sorry but you are to if you don't understand this yet.

                    For more then one sanctioning body to be up for grabs with multiple belts the other sanctions have to comply and give the O.K individually on their own so no they are binded to the contract that was given to them there will be no mando that overrides a Joshua title fight unless Ruiz wants to drop the belts.
                    Genius...the IBF did agree to anything in the Ruiz Joshua contract. They granted Ruiz an exception. Do you not know what an exception is? The IBF rules are clear that fighter contractual obligations do not supercede IBF rules. You conveniently ignored that in the other thread.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by REDEEMER View Post
                      This another lie. The mandatory does not go over an already signed bout agreed upon by the IBF and they would have sued Hearn for his press conference ,the belts are frozen right now in this fight ,its why Ruiz cant fight another fighter with them,this is just dumb and sorry but you are to if you don't understand this yet.
                      WTF are you talking about? The IBF has already told Ruiz & AJ they must fight by Dec 7 and the winner must fight Pulev by May 2020. That's part of the agreement for giving Ruiz an exemption. If that fight doesn't happen by Dec 7 then the IBF will call a mandatory for Pulev vs. Ruiz. The IBF said this. This isn't me talking.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP