Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Defends Designating Canelo Its Franchise Champ

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
    sorry to hear that the smart kids are picking on you
    you spelled "ret@rded kids" wrong.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
      you spelled "ret@rded kids" wrong.

      they spell it... Jab Jab Miss

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Senor_frogs View Post
        Canelo brutally knocked khan out. But up until that point Alvarez was having trouble with khans speed and movement. So Just because he beat brook doesn’t mean he didn’t struggle in the fight. GGG got hit way more than he ever did in previous fights and struggled defensively. So look at the whole fight and not just the outcome
        Both guys stopped their opponent in under six rounds. Wasn't much of a struggle.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Senor_frogs View Post
          You just went full Retrd If I have to explain to you why he was brought up in weight then idk what to tell you. But I’ll try. If there’s other viable opponents at MW and your promoter chooses to make an offer to a 154 pounder. Then what do you call that? Worst part is you know he did and you choose to ignore it.
          Eddie Hearn, Eubanks promoter was the one that called Brook not Loeffler when the Eubank fight fell apart. The fight was to be in England this kept the fight there. Brook had already expressed to Hearn a desire to fight Golovkin. The fight was made easily they didn't have to get a into a long protracted negotiation. Brook was a top fighter in his weight division and undefeated. There was nothing wrong with this fight.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by BigStomps View Post
            Shut the fucc up punk! You sound ****** as fucc with all that nonsense you be saying!
            Now either get your biitch ass to Fullerton and come see me or stay off my **** you fuccing lame! ����
            All good bro... let’s just see how this thing ends. You are really taking people back. No more messages.
            Last edited by Fire4231; 08-14-2019, 03:06 PM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
              Eddie Hearn, Eubanks promoter was the one that called Brook not Loeffler when the Eubank fight fell apart. The fight was to be in England this kept the fight there. Brook had already expressed to Hearn a desire to fight Golovkin. The fight was made easily they didn't have to get a into a long protracted negotiation. Brook was a top fighter in his weight division and undefeated. There was nothing wrong with this fight.



              he was a welter !

              it was a terrible fight you excuse-making muppet

              and YES... so was Canelo/Khan, even though those guys were only 1 division apart

              Comment


              • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                he was a welter !

                it was a terrible fight you excuse-making muppet

                and YES... so was Canelo/Khan, even though those guys were only 1 division apart
                Look idiot boy there was nothing wrong with this fight or the Khan fight. Its been done since boxing has been a sport. The outcome of both fights were as expected. I take issue when people attack Golovkin using Khan as a significant win on Canelo's resume. Both guys wanted the money that came with moving up and both guys took a beating. They are grown men and that's their choice.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                  Look idiot boy there was nothing wrong with this fight or the Khan fight. Its been done since boxing has been a sport. The outcome of both fights were as expected. I take issue when people attack Golovkin using Khan as a significant win on Canelo's resume. Both guys wanted the money that came with moving up and both guys took a beating. They are grown men and that's their choice.



                  exactly, they were both shlt fights

                  you Golovkin fans are simply used to them..... that is whats up

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                    Look idiot boy there was nothing wrong with this fight or the Khan fight. Its been done since boxing has been a sport. The outcome of both fights were as expected. I take issue when people attack Golovkin using Khan as a significant win on Canelo's resume. Both guys wanted the money that came with moving up and both guys took a beating. They are grown men and that's their choice.
                    When the diva's 3 best wins are Lara, Golovkin and Jacobs and 2 of those wins are close, disputed decisions, any victory even one over Khan is a big one. Sh/t, diva's fans even brag about the diva's win over a faded 40+ Mosley.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                      Eddie Hearn, Eubanks promoter was the one that called Brook not Loeffler when the Eubank fight fell apart. The fight was to be in England this kept the fight there. Brook had already expressed to Hearn a desire to fight Golovkin. The fight was made easily they didn't have to get a into a long protracted negotiation. Brook was a top fighter in his weight division and undefeated. There was nothing wrong with this fight.
                      He was a welter weight. It’s not like he was having trouble making weight and had to move up 2 weight classes because he outgrew the division. Both khan and brook fights were inexcusable fights for both guys.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP