Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Thurman: Nobody Wants To See Pacquiao-Mayweather Rematch!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Drew Bundini Br View Post
    PAC needs the $$ so look for him to be on his knees at MAYWEATHERS doorstep. However, that ship has sailed and PAC loss unanimously so THURMAN rematch makes sense.
    They both need the $$. Your hero cant sustain his lifestyle with the income hes making. Age old tactic..acts like you dont want something when you really do. He already got the boxing training videos out on his social media. He did same b4 McGregor and he clearly said he was coming back to fight Pacquiao on his Instagram. Keep it 100. He needs the dough too

    Comment


    • #42
      I want to see Pac set things aright with a two armed attack, both in shape both ready to fight and NO Excuses.

      This little gig by Mayweather is nothing more but to be in the public’s eye trying to stay relevant.

      He hasn’t fought a boxer since the then defunct what’s his name. Then he try’s to brag on the Conor fight and the little school boy! 😂😂😂😂😂

      Sorry Pac da chicken ain’t coming out to play!

      It MUST be a lot of Pain to be whupped by an OLD MAN😂😂😂😂😂

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
        Keith Thurman has continued to push for a rematch with Manny Pacquiao. Last month at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Pacquiao won a twelve round split decision over Thurman to capture the WBA welterweight title. Pacquiao, at 40-years-old, turned back the clock by dropping Thurman and then fighting in a toe to toe manner with the younger man for the entire fight.
        [Click Here To Read More]
        Thats true. Rather see Pacquiao rematch Thurman instead.

        Comment


        • #44
          Dear Keith, if you would have won the fight you wouldn't be going through this.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by ikigai View Post
            Thurman clearly didn't win more than six rounds against Pacquiao. Even if you were blind, you clearly couldn't give Thurman six rounds. Minus the knockdown, means Pacquiao clearly won the fight.

            It was a clear win. If you say otherwise then you clearly don't know how to score a fight.

            I didnt have Manny winning. LOL!! When Keith got fat, started writing poetry, doing buddist peace chants and was knee deep it pretty Nepal puxxy it knew he was done. The fight Lopez was no surprise as was the Manny fight. Im surprised he looked good in the second half of the fight considering his conditioning and health.

            So you know better than the judges?? Why don't we hire you instead of the most qualified people for the job. Whats your criteria for judging boxing??

            It seems that fight fans have a hard time respecting the judges decisions when they don'y align up with their fandom. Hince, your comments and your lack of description of the way you feel fights should be judged. Its easy to call the judges ****** when you dont get your way but you sound ****** when you dont have any logical judging criteria of your own.

            A split decision that was a clear victory was May vs Canelo. Not a fight were Manny got out landed on power and total punches. I doubt your a real fight fan and not a Manny

            Funny how biased fight fans say Fury "clearly beat" Wilder even though he got floored twice decisively and only on landed Wilder by 13 punches (out of 84) while NEVER stunning Wilder or stoping him from coming forward or controlling the ring.

            Yet Manny who didnt out power punch Thurman or out land Thurman "clearly won" a fight were a flash knockdown was the decisive punch. I just want to know what system of judging do you people use.

            You criteria clearly changes from fight to fight and situation to situation. Manny won that fight but it was a lot closer than his fans want to frame the story.

            Then the fan bois go on to say that that Floyd and Thurman aren't worthy of fighting someone who isnt the same fighter when VADA is involved.

            Basically setting up their hero for a ass beating by Spence or Crawford who would have sent Thurman night night if they were to fight him in his current state.

            The second half of the fight was "clearly" Thurman's and if he is in better condition with no busted ribs then he's going to hurt Manny badly for 12 rounds. Manny "clearly" had trouble once Keith figured out Manny and Manny couldnt finish Keith off.

            Manny isnt going to beat Thurman, Canelo, Floyd, Spence, Crawford, or Haney in the next two years. Glad he got his cupcake fight out the way because the rest of the way is going to be a gauntlet of hell unless he can get a Jeff Horn rematch which he has a rightful reason for the fight. Pac vs Horn might make his fanbois happy and be a warm up to something bigger but the general public isnt going to buy that fight like its 2008.

            All those fights are possible except Pac vs May which needs to happen in the next year or Im not interested. I hope Pacs fans enjoy the limelight while its good. They should. But it inst going to be a cakewalk and it going to be much harder than his first run.

            Comment


            • #46
              Mayweather is retired. He no longer has the fight in him. However, Pacquiao does so he can fight Thurman in a rematch if he wants to.

              Comment


              • #47
                Didn’t read. Did Thurman mention that no one wants to see him on PPV ever again or was this all about someone who beat him?

                Comment


                • #48
                  Mayweather-Pacquiao II Slower fight with more hugging

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    You only get "One Time", Thurman

                    He talked way too much about retiring Pac, who only had tiny T-Rex arms. Everybody remembers the talk.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Manny clearly wins TWO rounds against Floyd = NSB screams for a rematch constantly for over FOUR YEARS.

                      Manny wins a RAZOR CLOSE decision against Thurman = "meh, no need for rematch".

                      Manny wins a RAZOR CLOSE decision against Bradley in the second fight = "meh, no need for a third".

                      Manny LOSES a close unanimous decision against Horn = "meh, no need for rematch".


                      You guys' hypocrisy is showing. I'm just sayin

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP