Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Kownacki-Arreola FOX Telecast Peaked At 1,769,000 Viewers

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    UFC averaged a lot more viewers. The PBC-Fox deal supposed to have championship level fights on Fox, was Kownacki-Arreola championship level? Also look at the **** Haymon has been giving Showtime too. Who are also paying a lot of money.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by DARTH SILKWORMS View Post
      You don't know what the budget was and you don't know what fighters get paid. So you don't know if they could have put on a bigger fight. What you do know is that 1.7 million people watched. That's a good thing.
      He has a budget of over 60 mil a year from Fox. He supposed to provide championship level fights on Fox. Stop making excuses. The guy cheaped out and put on a undercard fight.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
        You expose your ******ity by comparing. Fox could put on almost anything and get better numbers.
        You expose your ******ity by commenting.

        An hour long TV show costs an average 5-6 million bucks to produce. Fox is getting between 150-200 hours of competitive content a year for $60 million. Do the math; the numbers have been great considering the price tag; as others have pointed out, Fox paid twice as much to the UFC for similar ratings.

        And we haven't even got into football season. Once we start seeing cards promoted during NFL games and cards that start at the end of NFL telecasts, the numbers are going to be even better.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
          He has a budget of over 60 mil a year from Fox. He supposed to provide championship level fights on Fox. Stop making excuses. The guy cheaped out and put on a undercard fight.
          That card would have been on sky box office in your part of the world

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by paulf View Post
            You expose your ******ity by commenting.

            An hour long TV show costs an average 5-6 million bucks to produce. Fox is getting between 150-200 hours of competitive content a year for $60 million. Do the math; the numbers have been great considering the price tag; as others have pointed out, Fox paid twice as much to the UFC for similar ratings.

            And we haven't even got into football season. Once we start seeing cards promoted during NFL games and cards that start at the end of NFL telecasts, the numbers are going to be even better.
            It was up against reality shows. That aren't expensive. Try again emo boy.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Phenom View Post
              That card would have been on sky box office in your part of the world
              Not a chance. There was no brit in it. You shouldn't be in tv ratings threads after the whooping you took yesterday.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                Not a chance. There was no brit in it. You shouldn't be in tv ratings threads after the whooping you took yesterday.
                I'm sure they would throw in Tom Little or Cheesman on the undercard and charge you PPV for it


                Lol at whopping I can't believe someone is trying to argue Crawford is a bigger draw than DSG

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Phenom View Post
                  I'm sure they would throw in Tom Little or Cheesman on the undercard and charge you PPV for it


                  Lol at whopping I can't believe someone is trying to argue Crawford is a bigger draw than DSG
                  You resorted to lying when your own links showed you were wrong and then ran off.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                    It was up against reality shows. That aren't expensive. Try again emo boy.
                    The point once again flies right over your head. I really pray you’re trolling.

                    60mil/175hrs of content=Reality show production costs (340k per hour of content) for live sports drawing competitive numbers. Here on planet earth, that’s a great value.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                      You resorted to lying when your own links showed you were wrong and then ran off.
                      What did I lie about you the one that said Brook v Porter did better than DSG v Porter and I showed you DSG v porter and Salka fights did better

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP