Comments Thread For: Ruiz Dares Joshua: You Can Whoop Me in Tijuana? Prove It!

[_Rexy_]

I read the article, no mention of loaded gloves. AS OF TODAY...so far, one report by one person mentioned dianabol from a nothing web site and every other report sites the same web site as their source. and AS OF TODAY nobody has yet to corroborate the the existence of dianabol, not the WBC, Vada, nobody. At this point I'm not willing to hang Dillian Whyte anymore then Marsellos Wilder, I'll Wait for the facts to come out and make a judgement.



Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/ until it's confirmed. BTW, AS OF TODAY....First test Second test was clean.

You’ll wait until the facts are out, so we’ll ignore a positive A sample, but you’ll post a tweet that’s proof that Whyte is innocent. Okay.

And M Wilder failed a drug test. For THC. It was posted online.

And we’re ignoring the gloves thing then, okay.

[factsarenice]

So you’re ignoring it them. Gotcha. Facts ARE nice! If he fought any of those eliminators he’d have fought Wilder already. Also, those “less deserving tin cans” were Luis Ortiz (the guy that Whyte refused to fight in a final eliminator) and Tyson Fury.

Tin cans lol

Tyson Fury changes mind on Dillian Whyte fight, declares he’s ‘not interested. https://talksport.com/sport/boxing/5...ot-interested/

[_Rexy_]

Tyson Fury changes mind on Dillian Whyte fight, declares he’s ‘not interested. https://talksport.com/sport/boxing/5...ot-interested/

Once again, has NOTHING to do with the three prior final eliminators that Whyte turned down. Care to explain?

[factsarenice]

Your deflecting again. Wilder was accused of using Peds and everyone raced to judgement and you know it. THC came out later and you know that too.

There was no mention of loaded gloves and you know that because I suspect you read the article too so stop with all the nonsense.

You’ll wait until the facts are out, so we’ll ignore a positive A sample, but you’ll post a tweet that’s proof that Whyte is innocent. Okay.

And M Wilder failed a drug test. For THC. It was posted online.

And we’re ignoring the gloves thing then, okay.

[_Rexy_]

Your deflecting again. Wilder was accused of using Peds and everyone raced to judgement and you know it. THC came out later and you know that too.

There was no mention of loaded gloves and you know that because I suspect you read the article too so stop with all the nonsense.

I linked you the interview with Anber, you ignored it. I mentioned that I personally spoke to Anber, you ignored that. Instead you keep posting an article about how Fury didn’t want to fight Whyte earlier this year in hopes that it proves what exactly? That he didn’t cheat against Rivas? (It doesn’t) that he didn’t turn down three final eliminators? (It doesn’t)

And are you implying that the copy of M Wilder’s positive test is a forgery? So a literal photocopy of a failed PED test is fake...no wonder you don’t trust D Sample Dillian’s failed test.

[OnlytheTruth]

Comments Thread For: Ruiz Dares Joshua: You Can Whoop Me in Tijuana? Prove It!

Whats that got to do with Ruiz asking AJ to fight in MX?

Ok, fair enough, I can see that it may not have been clear. I was focusing on the 'whooping' and that AJ has the ability to put Ruiz down, rather than the location of where it could happen.

[factsarenice]

If the WBC intends to manufacture a new eliminator every time the belt holder is supposed to face the #1 contender what's the point? Oddly, none of the proposed opponents were ever rated higher than Whyte and yet each were handed a title shot... If we follow the WBC & your logic...since Fury refused to face Whyte in the eliminator, shouldn't Whyte get the title shot and not Fury? How do you explain that?

As for the article, I'm not going to cut and paste the entire article. You have the link.

Once again, has NOTHING to do with the three prior final eliminators that Whyte turned down. Care to explain?

[factsarenice]

Ok, fair enough, I can see that it may not have been clear. I was focusing on the 'whooping' and that AJ has the ability to put Ruiz down, rather than the location of where it could happen.

They are never going to fight in Mexico because no American will cross the boarder for a fight.

[_Rexy_]

If the WBC intends to manufacture a new eliminator every time the belt holder is supposed to face the #1 contender what's the point? Oddly, none of the proposed opponents were ever rated higher than Whyte and yet each was handed a title shot... If we follow the WBC logic of the following your logic...since Fury refused to face Whyte in the eliminator, shouldn't Whyte gets the title shot and not Fury? How do you explain that?

As for the article, I'm not going to cut and paste the entire article. You have the link.

Yes, every time that a mandatory is decided, a final eliminator takes place. Every. Single. Time. So yes, you answered your own question. I already told you before, the rankings are just that: rankings. They don’t determine who’s #1 contender, a final eliminator does that. The final eliminator is TYPICALLY between #1 and #2 but if one of them turn it down, then it goes down the list.

And no, Whyte wouldn’t get the title shot because Fury refused, the next person down the rankings would be given the choice, as I’ve mentioned.

You need to look into the difference between a mandatory defense and a voluntary defense.

Joshua fought Povetkin as a mandatory. Povetkin had a final eliminator against David Price.

Joshua fought Ruiz as a replacement, originally intended to be Miller who was a VOLUNTARY. No eliminator was held. Miller fought nobodies until then.

Understand the difference?

Pulev vs H Fury was a final eliminator for the IBF. It was supposed to be Pulev vs Whyte but Whyte refused. Pulev won the fight so he’s now IBF mandatory. He still had to fight.

[_Rexy_]

Remember how Rid**** Bowe dropped his WBC belt in the trash? That was because he didn’t like that (Canadian boxing legend) Lennox Lewis won the FINAL ELIMINATOR