Comments Thread For: Golovkin-Derevyanchenko Formally Ordered By The IBF

[j.razor]

One was mandatory at 160... Had experience fighting Jacobs...#1 ibf
#5 WBC #7 160lber

And Steve Rolls is..............Black?

By comparison he 10x better than Rolls...Your ego cant except that?

Okay I'll give you 1x better but NOT 10x better.

[Boxing_1013]

I watched ALL of those fights kid

in every single one of those fights it was clearly obvious that Ward was on another level

you are an absolute fool

How did you score the Bika fight?

[Boxing_1013]

fkn rubbish, life-n-death means... pushed to your limit, stretched

we saw Golovkin's ceiling in the Jacobs/Canelo fights

no way is he 50/50 with Hagler, you are dreaming

One little detail...in his prime 28 y.o. Canelo couldn't convincingly beat past his prime 36 y.o. GGG. 36, dummy. It's called age in boxing and still nobody has managed to dominate him. That should tell you who GGG was in his prime. So yeah prime GGG vs prime Hagler would have been a 50/50 fight of very close to it.

Not to mention that Hagler lost to Monroe...Watts...went 15 hard close rounds with a smaller old Duran...was schooled by a smaller SRL.

Hagler was great and if you tried to go to war with him, well not even Mugabe or Hearns could put a dent in him.

But if you could box/move and take a punch, Hagler struggled in a way because he wouldn't box his way in...he would just put his head down and try and bounce his way in, taking your shots to give his...if you were still there to be hit then yeah not even Hearns and Mugabe or anyone else he fought could bother him.

With Hagler showing vulnerabilities against less than elite competition (SRL and Duran obviously elite, but not really their best weights/prime either), to say that GGG would have no chance is a strange look imo...not to mention that you were the one apparently who keeps bringing up that discussion out of nowhere lol...apparently just looking for an argument lol.

Just enjoy the sport man...not everything has to be 'us vs them'...there are a lot of great fighters all around and to spend so much time arbitrarily hating guys is not a good look imo and must not be very healthy for ya...

[Boxing_1013]

Okay I'll give you 1x better but NOT 10x better.

Bro just fyi...1x better is saying they are the same level btw

I see what you are trying to say though, I think

[aboutfkntime]

One little detail...in his prime 28 y.o. Canelo couldn't convincingly beat past his prime 36 y.o. GGG. 36, dummy. It's called age in boxing and still nobody has managed to dominate him. That should tell you who GGG was in his prime. So yeah prime GGG vs prime Hagler would have been a 50/50 fight of very close to it.

only in your little mind

Hagler > Hypekin..... not even close

[aboutfkntime]

Not to mention that Hagler lost to Monroe...Watts...went 15 hard close rounds with a smaller old Duran...was schooled by a smaller SRL.

Hagler was great and if you tried to go to war with him, well not even Mugabe or Hearns could put a dent in him.

But if you could box/move and take a punch, Hagler struggled in a way because he wouldn't box his way in...he would just put his head down and try and bounce his way in, taking your shots to give his...if you were still there to be hit then yeah not even Hearns and Mugabe or anyone else he fought could bother him.

With Hagler showing vulnerabilities against less than elite competition (SRL and Duran obviously elite, but not really their best weights/prime either), to say that GGG would have no chance is a strange look imo...not to mention that you were the one apparently who keeps bringing up that discussion out of nowhere lol...apparently just looking for an argument lol.

Just enjoy the sport man...not everything has to be 'us vs them'...there are a lot of great fighters all around and to spend so much time arbitrarily hating guys is not a good look imo and must not be very healthy for ya...

a guy who cannot differentiate between Ward Bika Barrera Miranda..... will have nothing worthwhile to say about boxing..... and should never be taken seriously

you are the dumb kid standing outside the candy store, licking the window..... on the outside, looking in

learn the sport

and start with the rules LMAO

[alexjust]

only in your little mind

Hagler > Hypekin..... not even close

For some reason every time I speak to you I always have that little hope that there is a reason lurking somewhere there under your skull...I have to say I'm always left disappointed.

I guess your blatant disregard for argument, blind hateful bias and denial of objective reality doesn't help either

I might even concede that Hagler would be a favorite in this imaginary fight with GGG, but by a very thin margin meaning that 50/50 is still a justifiable statement.

[aboutfkntime]

For some reason every time I speak to you I always have that little hope that there is a reason lurking somewhere there under your skull...I have to say I'm always left disappointed.

I guess your blatant disregard for argument, blind hateful bias and denial of objective reality doesn't help either

I might even concede that Hagler would be a favorite in this imaginary fight with GGG, but by a very thin margin meaning that 50/50 is still a justifiable statement.

oh really... ?

so, you " might " concede that... " might " you LMAO

funny shlt

funny shlt, that a proven great " might " be favored over a largely-unproven hypejob who does not have a career-defining win

good on ya

[aboutfkntime]

when we saw G's ceiling with Jacobs/Canelo..... all of that ret4rded "G can beat Hagler" talk stopped dead in it's tracks

but, now it's back again

just like how all the talk about who is greater May or Pac, STOPPED

but now that Pac beat Thurman..... it's back again loooool

was it the Rolls win that convinced you again bro ?

[Boxing_1013]

a guy who cannot differentiate between Ward Bika Barrera Miranda..... will have nothing worthwhile to say about boxing..... and should never be taken seriously

you are the dumb kid standing outside the candy store, licking the window..... on the outside, looking in

learn the sport

and start with the rules LMAO

Fighters from certain areas get hyped up...just how it is...if you are from US UK Mexico and to some extent Eastern Europe then you get some hype...that's where all the money is.

A lot of times that hype is more or less warranted...sometimes those guys are overhyped and get exposed..or are overhyped and get hometown favoritism...just try to call it like I see it and score fights based on what I see in the ring and not on whose trunks look better or where a guy is from.