Max Kellerman: Manny Pacquiao has a case for the best pound-for-pound fighter ever

[noStylez]

Max is right, Pac has a "case" for best p4p ever...just as other ATG, his resume is impressive and if you think he doesn't then you're just straight hater with an illogical bias.

[aboutfkntime]

WHO did you beat, with consideration given to when/how

..... oh, and there is also consideration given to losses


NOTHING else matters.....

not paper titles

not espy's

not twitter followers

and not 97,000 fkn idiots

[aboutfkntime]

Max is right, Pac has a "case" for best p4p ever...just as other ATG, his resume is impressive and if you think he doesn't then you're just straight hater with an illogical bias.

if you think he is, then you're just a straight idiot

NO boxing historian thinks that Pac is the GOAT

only silly Max, who must be back on the drink

you idiots always mouth off before/after a Pac fight LMAO

[Pigeons]

Pacquiao's a great fighter.

[aboutfkntime]

FACT: when you have to mention anonymous " titles ".....

..... " titles " that did not even exist back when MANY great fighters were active..... rather than names.....

..... then, you know you lost

NAMES !!

and NO, Thurman is not a name

muppets

[Long jabber]

if pac captures all the titles this late in the game he is top 3 goat

[tangalog2200]

P4P is NOT based on..... " weight class titles won".....

wtf ?

is that why munters think Pac is the #1 all time ?

hah surely not

you silly tagalog, MOST of the divisions today..... did not even exist back when some of the GREATEST fighters were doing their thing

Armstrong fought in a era with 8 divisions, and 8 titles

today..... there are 17 divisions, and more than 100+ " titles "

Armstrong would have TRUCKLOADS of that rubbish if that rubbish existed back when he was the king

as usual, this thread will be full of people saying ****** things similar to what you just said

I HATE you people

the "Pac beat unproven/inactive Thurman, so now he is the GOAT" people..... are beyond ******..... MAX INCLUDED

FACT: if there was only one title today, like back in Armstrong's era..... nobody would be mentioning Pac's win over Thurman

clearly you miss my point...as it is evident you have very poor reading comprehension...

what you are saying is based of IFs...a fantasy...


"Armstrong would have TRUCKLOADS of that rubbish if that rubbish existed back when he was the king"

"I HATE you people" Why hate? This is a forum, yes? no?


"the "Pac beat unproven/inactive Thurman, so now he is the GOAT" people..... are beyond ******..... MAX INCLUDED" Did I say pac is the GOAT?

"FACT: if there was only one title today, like back in Armstrong's era..... nobody would be mentioning Pac's win over Thurman" A FACT based on an if? Are we to take only 1 time frame for the p4p issue? say Armstrong era?
__________________

[aboutfkntime]

clearly you miss my point...as it is evident you have very poor reading comprehension...

what you are saying is based of IFs...a fantasy...


"Armstrong would have TRUCKLOADS of that rubbish if that rubbish existed back when he was the king"

"I HATE you people" Why hate? This is a forum, yes? no?


"the "Pac beat unproven/inactive Thurman, so now he is the GOAT" people..... are beyond ******..... MAX INCLUDED" Did I say pac is the GOAT?

"FACT: if there was only one title today, like back in Armstrong's era..... nobody would be mentioning Pac's win over Thurman" A FACT based on an if? Are we to take only 1 time frame for the p4p issue? say Armstrong era?
__________________

no, you forget about all that multi-division rubbish and start mentioning names

the ONLY thing that counts

one poster bought up a great point earlier.....

you can pile up all of that junk if you wish..... espy, twitter, ABC title junk..... that is fine..... but, Mayweather beat a guy with all that junk, and his name was Manny Pacquiao..... so, yea..... no matter how high you say Pacquiao is, Mayweather is higher..... not just because he beat Pacquiao, because he has more better/higher-level wins and no losses

FACT: if there was only one title today, like back in Armstrong's era..... nobody would be mentioning Pac's win over Thurman..... because Thurman would be just a mid-level guy coming off injury/inactivity, who looked terrible in his last fight

[man down]

On Max on Boxing, Kellerman says Pacquiao's win over Keith Thurman added onto his many accomplishments makes him have a case to top the all time P4P list.

Two back to back Fighter of the Decade awards is one thing, but all time pound for pound fighter of all time is probably a bit of a stretch.

Im blown away Max said this. He hates on Pac all the time.

[aboutfkntime]

Im blown away Max said this. He hates on Pac all the time.

Max is just trying to get as many twitter followers as possible before he leaves HBO