Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wilder Lashes Out at Whyte: I Can't Wait To Hear The Excuse

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Thaman2x View Post
    Here's a logical question....Why hasn't the results of the "B" Sample come to light yet? It does not take this long. People speak of the adjudication process being the reason why He was allowed to fight...If that's the case, then that implies his B sample was tested and came back clean...however, that is NOT the case because apparently his B test is still not back yet.

    As Per the UKAD, "Where the Notice of Charge is based on an Adverse Analytical Finding, the athlete has the right to request analysis of the B-Sample.

    If the B-Sample does not confirm the result of the A-Sample then the entire test is considered as negative and the Notice of Charge withdrawn. No further action will be taken against the athlete.

    If the B-Sample analysis confirms the Adverse Analytical Finding in respect of the A-Sample, then the athlete can either accept the finding and consequences specified in the Notice of Charge or request that the matter proceed to a hearing."

    At the end of the day, the burden of proof rests on Whyte...He was allowed to fight without any consideration of duty of care for his opponent... Hearn clearly didnt care about Rivas..and neither did the UKAD. and THATS THE ISSUE HERE
    the results have come out, they were negative

    Comment


    • PBC politics

      classic PBC politics trying to keep away from Whyte. As Peter Fury says you can eat some **** and it pops on the test and Whyte isnt so dumb to pay VADA ****ing 40k to then purposely cheat

      Comment


      • Originally posted by P4Pdunny View Post
        the results have come out, they were negative
        Was that the B sample for the UKAD testing, or was that the VADA testing?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by LetOutTheCage View Post
          And weed is on the prohibited list because it can help fighters in training (can help with soreness for example). So you defend him event though he failed because of something on the prohibited list? proves my point about double standards on here
          You are comparing Cannabis with Dianabol. Soreness? lol. Steroids and marijuana are the same? I guess only in the good old U.K!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by P4Pdunny View Post
            the results have come out, they were negative
            Negative? Then Whyte never failed a drug test. No offense but I'll wait for an official announcement.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View Post
              Was that the B sample for the UKAD testing, or was that the VADA testing?
              VADA testing the reports say

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Brettcappe View Post
                Negative? Then Whyte never failed a drug test. No offense but I'll wait for an official announcement.
                none taken at all. Apparently he passed VADA pre and post testing. I'm sure Boxingscene will have something up in a few hours.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by P4Pdunny View Post
                  none taken at all. Apparently he passed VADA pre and post testing. I'm sure Boxingscene will have something up in a few hours.
                  I believe that this is what you are referring to. It does not exonerate Whyte.



                  https://www.badlefthook.com/2019/8/1...ght-vada-tests

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by P4Pdunny View Post
                    VADA testing the reports say
                    This is from Dan Rafael:



                    The final pre-fight and post-fight VADA random drug tests for heavyweights Dillian Whyte and Oscar Rivas were negative for any banned substances, according to the letter VADA sent to the fighters and their teams on Thursday, a copy of which was obtained by ESPN. Both fighters had samples collected on July 17 as well July 21, the day after the fight, and they came back negative. Whyte failed a pre-fight test conducted by UKAD, which was also testing both boxers, for the banned steroid dianabol in a sample collected June 17. That result came to light during fight week but, he was still allowed to box in the vacant WBC interim title bout, which he won by unanimous decision. UKAD has yet to explain why he was allowed to fight. The WBC this week withdrew its recognition of Whyte's interim title until it completes its own investigation. VADA had not been made aware of the failed UKAD test nor was Rivas.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Brettcappe View Post
                      I believe that this is what you are referring to. It does not exonerate Whyte.



                      https://www.badlefthook.com/2019/8/1...ght-vada-tests
                      Originally posted by P4Pdunny View Post
                      VADA testing the reports say
                      The UKAD sample was taken June 17th. Its interesting that the VADA letter only mentions that tests were administered on July 17th and 21st.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP