Originally posted by SchoolTheseCats
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Wilder Lashes Out at Whyte: I Can't Wait To Hear The Excuse
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostYou're trying too hard. Try acknowledging that Whyte has failed a test and now must prove that he is innocent. Or you could acknowledge that his prior failed test he doesn't get the benefit of the doubt this time
Comment
-
Originally posted by Calibaloc View PostI would have replid to you directly but looking at your posts, I already know you are not worth it. This will be my last reply to you. You are a deluded and contaminated fan whether you know it or not...
Comment
-
Originally posted by LetOutTheCage View PostAsking for the investigation process to be finalized before making a decision is trying too hard? I hope your not a judge by trade.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LetOutTheCage View PostTests can be failed because the sample has been compromised...He is currently in the process of contesting this. At no time have I said Whyte is innocent, if you read my comments again I asked for clear evidence that he cheated, that should be provided from the result of this investigation before calling him a cheat. If his B sample came back clean then everyone who has already made their minds up will look foolish. I did also said that if he is proven to have cheated then he should be banned for life. I keep seeing people claiming that i'm somehow defending Whyte simply because im asking for facts before making a decision.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LetOutTheCage View PostAsking for the investigation process to be finalized before making a decision is trying too hard? I hope your not a judge by trade.
As Per the UKAD, "Where the Notice of Charge is based on an Adverse Analytical Finding, the athlete has the right to request analysis of the B-Sample.
If the B-Sample does not confirm the result of the A-Sample then the entire test is considered as negative and the Notice of Charge withdrawn. No further action will be taken against the athlete.
If the B-Sample analysis confirms the Adverse Analytical Finding in respect of the A-Sample, then the athlete can either accept the finding and consequences specified in the Notice of Charge or request that the matter proceed to a hearing."
At the end of the day, the burden of proof rests on Whyte...He was allowed to fight without any consideration of duty of care for his opponent... Hearn clearly didnt care about Rivas..and neither did the UKAD. and THATS THE ISSUE HERE
Comment
-
Originally posted by redeemer View Postdeontays brother tested positive and that substance was never officially announced ,they claim canninbas but that's b.s it was swept under the rug by the wbc ,again wilder shady doings here when hes involved.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SchoolTheseCats View PostA failed test is a failed test now you can compare what each boxer failed for recreational drugs are different but nonetheless you fail you deserve to be banned no matter if you from America,u.k, or space
Comment
Comment