The WBC cant stop UKAD to using admissible evidence such as a VADA passed test .The only thing the WBC can do is make its own rules up and takeaway whytes position which probably wont happen if UKAD finds him innocent unlike the shenanigans when Stiverme tested positive under VADA but cleared him ? Ha
The B sample can have the same amount it doesn't matter if they prove cross contamination.
This is what seperates posters like you who admit by your own words you are ****** and deranged and also admitted to pasting and posting to keep up with the other posters ,but that's the funny part …...you do it because you just aren't smart.
The B sample can have the same amount it doesn't matter if they prove cross contamination.
This is what seperates posters like you who admit by your own words you are ****** and deranged and also admitted to pasting and posting to keep up with the other posters ,but that's the funny part …...you do it because you just aren't smart.
Comment