I'm calling it now. Whyte will be cleared.

[ShoulderRoll]

Dont panic boy, Whyte was never going to get the Wilder fight, when the PBC want people frozen out they get people frozen out.

Are you suggesting that PBC twisted Shyte's arm and forced him to take PEDs?

[DaNeutral.]

Are you suggesting that PBC twisted Shyte's arm and forced him to take PEDs?

No. Im saying the PBC would do what ever it takes to make sure they get the opposition they want for their fighters and one way or another freeze out the opposition they dont want.

[Mammoth]

Are you suggesting that PBC twisted Shyte's arm and forced him to take PEDs?

[MulaKO]

Hearn flexing his Dazn muscle
At the end of the day Rivas gets fughed

[Alan Smithee]

Fella, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about!

Frank Warren has been promoting boxing in the UK for nearly 40 years. This is a quote from his latest article on the main page of this site. He's talking about the Dilian Whyte drama, of course:

"Normally, under these circumstances, a boxer is immediately suspended and is given seven days to respond. Of the two samples taken – A and B – the B sample is retained to be tested, at the request of the boxer at a later date if he refutes the findings in the A Sample."

We all make mistakes and get things wrong sometimes. Just accept that were mistaken about this and stop doubling down on your error.

Doubling down on my error?

You forgot the rest of the article:

“Normally, under these circumstances, a boxer is immediately suspended. He is given seven days to respond. Of the two samples taken – A and B – the B sample is retained to be tested, at the request of the boxer at a later date if he refutes the findings in the A Sample. “Strangely, most Athletes wait months to have a hearing. But on this occasion a hearing took place on the Saturday morning, which was kept secret, for reasons we don’t know. “But, the one person this should not have been kept from is Oscar Rivas. “Everybody concerned had a duty of care to inform him of this situation. He was the one getting into the ring with someone who – nobody disputes this at the moment – had tested positive for a PED.


You notice the words "normally" and "strangely"? If Mr. Warren is correct than why wasn't Whyte "suspended". Did he or did he not test positive for a banned substance? Why are so many sources claiming that UKAD and the BBB o C are awaiting the results of the "B" sample? Just to let you guys know the only opinions that I post are the ability of a fighter or my predictions on the outcome of a fight. Everything else that I post is either from sourced material or from people in the industry. These are not my thoughts and wants on the Whyte situation.


Here is another copy and paste:


The UKAD test result was reported to the governing body for this fight, the British Boxing Board of Control, and the BBBofC allowed the fight to proceed. The reasoning was that the B sample must be tested and also found to come out positive before any action is taken against the doping fighter by the BBBofC.

While this sounds formally good in assuming someone is innocent until proven guilty, allowing fighters who test positive on their A samples to fight usually means allowing a fighter who used PEDs to fight since experience has shown that almost all B samples come out the same as the A sample.

[Stuntman Mike]

Evidence and common sense.

1. Whyte has passed VADA testing.

2. Taking a drug that has a detection of 19 days, VADA would have caught him if he was doing it during training.

3. Nobody is going to start taking a steroid AFTER finishing training already. Would be pointless.

4. Keeping evidence (his hair) which can be tested, someone guilty would be very ****** to do.

Leads me to believe the man wasn't roiding.

Why take steroids?to go harder and faster in training and to improve endurance ,there is plenty reason to take something on fight day hence the reason they test after aswell because everyone knows it makes you stronger and faster and have more endurance while it's in your blood so point 3 is ridiculous and narrow minded,it also shows how uneducated you are in this subject or you're just extremely bias

[S.W.F.C]

Ahhh Dbol, Cardio goes outta the window, calf and lower back pumps are a killer. No way he was training on Dbol. I ran two cycles and both times even walking on the treadmill was a struggle.
I dont believe hes been popping orals, he wouldn't have been able to go 12 rounds.

[Alan Smithee]

Yea and what happened in those cases? BCCC cannot be sued if they have reason to stop a fight ,they cannot assume the B sample will be negative the very case you are ,it all depends when the accussed challenged the findings and in what time frame, in this one the B sample is being challenged and had other testing involved outside UKAD so you are just trying to not be wrong which isn't possible here.

Had they stopped the fight and the B is negative it would have only happened if Whyte didn't challenge the findings so no legal action can occure ,that's the problem you are putting up links and thinking you sound smart,just stop. Ha


EDIT : and what link are you talking about ,you posted one about boxing gloves or are you lying as usual ? Ha

Here is copy and paste and a link:

It is understood that Whyte’s AAF occurred on 17 July. Had the BBBofC suspended Whyte, it may have made itself vulnerable to a lawsuit. The dangers of such an approach have been thrown into sharp relief by recent cases involving Mamadou Sakho and Sun Yang.

https://www.sportsintegrityinitiative.com/mamadou-sakho-sues-wada-for-13-million-in-damages/

Am I lying as usual? Jerkoff! Never lied once on this site. Are all sources 100% correct all the time? Of course not but lying? You are a di.k head!

[Alan Smithee]

I really don't think anyone on here wants the work,wow...good showing juggs and brett,dont do it. Ha

Awesome double hook and to the shoulder roll guy ,why post this it shows you are scared to? Ha

I am going to get in to a fight over a boxing forum? What the fu.k is wrong with you people? Get your priorities straight. This is supposed to be about boxing fans conversing and debating about the sport that we love. I use my love for the sport of boxing to keep me grounded and keep my mind occupied. It's guys like you who are fu.king up this site.

[Alan Smithee]

Well you're the self admitted CORRECTIONS officer,so ?Lets see how tough you are since tyou deem me some punk on here? Oh that's right you're probably another little kid in his moms house right ? I tell you what punk mofo ,im going to be on you on here 24 /7 now ,,,,,that's right biatch bc I know your near me ...lol


And BTW testing for SYNTHETIC subtances and recreational are completely different when testing any type of hair particularly body as was explained to you....and everyone who responded to you clowned you completely anyway.


Did I mention id cave your 50 yr old f'ing face in ?

Don't worry about what others say why don't you do something about something if you have a problem ...BIATCH ???

Hey Juggernaut how old are you? Calling guys out on a forum for disagreeing with you! Do you work, have a family, responsibilites? This forum is for boxing talk. Save the tough guy B.S. You sound like I did at 16 years old. "Do you wanna fight"? Really dude! What the fu.k? It's guys like you who chase the good people off of these sites! I lost one of my kids and use my love of boxing to keep my mind busy. I'll respectfully turn down your offer of bashing my face in! Grow the fu.k up!