Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So, what was the exact amounts of banned substance found in Whyte's system?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So, what was the exact amounts of banned substance found in Whyte's system?

    Apparently Coppinger knows but I'm not subscribing to this shit


  • #2
    C'mon, it's all we've been talking about and now nobody knows what Copp reported?

    Comment


    • #3
      just subscribe so I don't have to


      cheap ass muh****a lol

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
        just subscribe so I don't have to


        cheap ass muh****a lol
        No way. Shit's like 4 bucks ffs....

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
          just subscribe so I don't have to


          cheap ass muh****a lol
          Seriously^. I can't be subscribing to that shyt. I'm busy browsing NSB.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
            No way. Shit's like 4 bucks ffs....
            yeah, but I'm already paying for DAZN

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
              yeah, but I'm already paying for DAZN
              Me too. I ain't paying them then paying another 4 bucks to find out how their fighters cheat lol.

              Comment


              • #8
                KTFOKING had it up

                From Coppinger:

                Quote:
                One metabolite — 17-epimithandienone —was evident in Whyte’s system at a measurement of 0.9 ng/ml (nanograms per milliliter), an industry source told The Athletic. That’s nine-tenths of one part per trillion, signifying an ultra-trace amount of the substance.

                Another metabolite — 6B-hydroxymethandienone — was found at a measurement of 3.0 ng/ml, per source, which equals three parts per trillion, also considered an ultra-trace amount.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
                  Another poster had it up

                  From Coppinger:

                  Quote:
                  One metabolite — 17-epimithandienone —was evident in Whyte’s system at a measurement of 0.9 ng/ml (nanograms per milliliter), an industry source told The Athletic. That’s nine-tenths of one part per trillion, signifying an ultra-trace amount of the substance.

                  Another metabolite — 6B-hydroxymethandienone — was found at a measurement of 3.0 ng/ml, per source, which equals three parts per trillion, also considered an ultra-trace amount.
                  *woops my bad got the detection windows wrong.

                  They're both short detection window metabolites, within 3 days.

                  I don't know why but 17beta-hydroxymethyl was stuck in my head. Iirc it was listed as one of the metabolites found in another thread. That said 17beta-hydroxymethyl is the long detection window metabolite.
                  Last edited by thesmokingman; 07-27-2019, 12:12 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Talk about Dazn being a tough sell, the idea of a subscription sporting news website, good luck with that.

                    With that said, I broke down and paid for you cheap bastards.

                    Whyte’s A sample revealed the metabolites; his B sample hasn’t been tested yet. The collection date of the samples isn’t known.

                    One metabolite — 17-epimithandienone —was evident in Whyte’s system at a measurement of 0.9 ng/ml (nanograms per milliliter), an industry source told The Athletic. That’s nine-tenths of one part per billion, signifying an ultra-trace amount of the substance.

                    Another metabolite — 6B-hydroxymethandienone — was found at a measurement of 3.0 ng/ml, per source, which equals three parts per billion, also considered an ultra-trace amount.


                    The rest of the article is pretty much what has been reported elsewhere. I haven't bothered to try and look up what those "ultra trace amounts" point to, from what Hearn said in some video, he alluded to the fact that Whyte used his VADA results from the similar time in the hearing.

                    Guessing if they can show a timeline of no metabolites at tests on X, XX, XXX, then these tiny amount at XXXX date and its such a small amount that it came from a tainted supplement and wasn't enough to do anything, thats entirely guess work though. Something was presented to the UK anti doping panel that made them not impose a provisional suspension it seems.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP