Pacquiao is put back onto Ring Magazine's P4P list (at #10)

[thedarkdragon11]

Bumping Nietes out? Nietes should be #9, GrandPac #10... Mikey should be the one bumped out...

[Bandman]

The disrespect lmao. Name 7 fighters better than Pacquiao right now who are destroying the top of their division... at 40 years of age.

F outta here with that bs, D9 cant stand it.

you a bumlovkin fan you have no business discussing this. bumlovkin isnt even top 20

[hectari]

" at the time "..... ?

but, not now..... ?

Pac beat him, now..... not, " at the time "

he was, One Time Thurman..... not, At This Time Thurman

Keith has not looked like the same fighter since returning from injury and inactivity..... nobody in their right mind would rank him above Spence and Crawford, and I think Porter would beat him right now

he is likely ranked #5..... #4 at the most

It dont matter how someone looked in a fight, Thurman was undefeated, you really dont know how to objectively rank fighters do you? ranking system is not how a guy looked system.

he was only off for a year and half no way can you push him down to 5 or 4 just stop, Floyd was off for like 3 years and still when he returned he was considered the number one guy at welterweight lol

just stop dude, Crawford and Spence both knock Pacmna out cold

but Pac just bypassed them with his win over Thurman.

[aboutfkntime]

It dont matter how someone looked in a fight, Thurman was undefeated, you really dont know how to objectively rank fighters do you? ranking system is not how a guy looked system.

he was only off for a year and half no way can you push him down to 5 or 4 just stop, Floyd was off for like 3 years and still when he returned he was considered the number one guy at welterweight lol

just stop dude, Crawford and Spence both knock Pacmna out cold

but Pac just bypassed them with his win over Thurman.

exactly

Pac only beat Thurman..... not Spence and Crawford

Thurman is just a mid-level welter..... who would almost certainly lose to at least 4 current welterweights.....

beating Thurman aint that special if a number of guys can do it

Porter would beat Thurman, and he aint elite..... and yet you want to crown Pac the GOAT for doing the same thing

[Damn Wicked]

Pacquiao should be ranked the number 1 welterweight, he beat the man. Thurman was widely considered the best before the year and half layoff. If floyd can remain the man after three years off i dont get how they can rank crawford so high. Welterweight should be pacman, spence, porter, thurman, and crawford.

Spence fought mikey garcia who wasnt ranked and was moving up
Crawford fought khan who was just a name and a shell

Crawford needs to leave top rank, there are no names for him there. The champs are at pbc

Very good point !

[Damn Wicked]

I wouldn't have a problem with Pacquiao being the #1 welterweight after what he just did in the fight with Thurman. How he can compete at such a high level at his age is truly remarkable! U thought Thurman was going to win by decision or stoppage. Many people are underestimating how good Thurman is and as a consequence they're also underestimating Pacquiao

[hugh grant]

exactly

Pac only beat Thurman..... not Spence and Crawford

Thurman is just a mid-level welter..... who would almost certainly lose to at least 4 current welterweights.....

beating Thurman aint that special if a number of guys can do it

Porter would beat Thurman, and he aint elite..... and yet you want to crown Pac the GOAT for doing the same thing

Pac s win over thurman is historically better than anything on floyds resume.

[MulaKO]

And rightly so
After his last fight , which was as a whole pretty damn amazing
Take into consideration his resume and that just enforces it

[aboutfkntime]

Pac s win over thurman is historically better than anything on floyds resume.

no, Floyd's win over Pac is much more historically significant

and most Mayweather opponents were better than Thurman

seriously, you silly pacstains go full-****** at the drop of a hat

before that fight, if anybody had suggested that beating Thurman would somehow miraculously vault Pac over Mayweather..... they would have been ridiculed.... and yet, here you are

[aboutfkntime]

before that fight, if anybody had suggested that beating Thurman would somehow miraculously vault Pac over Mayweather..... they would have been ridiculed.... and yet, here you are

oh no, losing multiple fights, some by knockout..... is completely irrelevant..... that makes no difference at all

and no, Mayweather schooling Pac is also irrelevant..... it means nothing

lets just forget about all the negatives, and focus on Pac beating THURMAN loooool



will Thurman be remember more than say..... David Diaz ?

did Thurman even achieve more than David Diaz ?