Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites

[Alan Smithee]

Whyte did not request his B side to be analysed!

Where are you getting this crap from?

As per Eddie Hearn, there wasn't time for the B sample to be analysed, so instead of going down that route, the BBBoC offered Whyte a chance to get clearance to fight by having an expert panel from UKAD interview him and examine the results of his VADA tests.

Dillian agreed to this and the hearing took place on the morning of the fight. After interviewing him and looking at his VADA record, the panel and the BBBoC cleared him to fight.

Figured you would answer with some ******ity. Whyte did indeed request that the "B" sample be tested. Here is the link idiot. Read the link and weep arsehole!https://www.badlefthook.com/2019/7/2...ar-rivas-fight

[Alan Smithee]

Whyte did not request his B side to be analysed!

Where are you getting this crap from?

As per Eddie Hearn, there wasn't time for the B sample to be analysed, so instead of going down that route, the BBBoC offered Whyte a chance to get clearance to fight by having an expert panel from UKAD interview him and examine the results of his VADA tests.

Dillian agreed to this and the hearing took place on the morning of the fight. After interviewing him and looking at his VADA record, the panel and the BBBoC cleared him to fight.

Is it still crap? Let me guess, now you will try and discredit "bad left hook". You do not know shyte about the game and you continue to prove yourself the fool! Anything else that you would like to know about boxing? Just let me know!

[_Rexy_]

Any news on the Whyte front other than his "tell all statement" from earlier today?

[andocom]

Figured you would answer with some ******ity. Whyte did indeed request that the "B" sample be tested. Here is the link idiot. Read the link and weep arsehole!https://www.badlefthook.com/2019/7/2...ar-rivas-fight

That was from a couple days ago and it seems that it wasn't the fact the B sample hadn't been tested that made the UK anti doping panel allow the fight to go ahead, it would seem more likely it was the fact Whyte presented his other VADA etc clean results and the fact the amounts were "ultra trace" .

If it we're just the B sample hadn't been tested I assume he would have been provisionally suspended.

So although you might be right in that Whyte requested the B sample tested, I don't think that had anything to do with him being allowed to fight.

[kafkod]

Is it still crap? Let me guess, now you will try and discredit "bad left hook". You do not know shyte about the game and you continue to prove yourself the fool! Anything else that you would like to know about boxing? Just let me know!

Headless chicken!

Do you understand what "false information being published by news outlets" means?

[kafkod]

That was from a couple days ago and it seems that it wasn't the fact the B sample hadn't been tested that made the UK anti doping panel allow the fight to go ahead, it would seem more likely it was the fact Whyte presented his other VADA etc clean results and the fact the amounts were "ultra trace" .

If it we're just the B sample hadn't been tested I assume he would have been provisionally suspended.

So although you might be right in that Whyte requested the B sample tested, I don't think that had anything to do with him being allowed to fight.

That's correct. Some people don't realise that a provisional suspension is not the same as a "sanction"

[low blows]

Man that brings back memories...

**** Pound was a fanboy of Johnson, going as far as defending him. It's ironic that Pound would later go on to be the helm WADA. Pound later went on to mastermind the illegal 99' samples test of Armstrong.
Damn, there really is so much dumb**** with antidoping.

Everybody and his brother knew Johnson was doping, no way Pound was defending his cleanliness. If he defended him he did it in a legal way, the Canadian media hinted at Johnson being dirty and being in a drug camp but they couldn't out and out say it or their late coach would have sued the paper they wrote for.

I remember the year he won gold in Rome I was weightlifting in a gym and every muscle head was laughing their heads off at the notion of Johnson being clean, in fact one guy said what he was on......

[Bronx2245]

I don’t care what the penalty is, because I know he has a signed contract. So knowing he has a signed contract am expecting a fight. Whether the fight is in mars or Mexico is irrelevant. As long as he adheres to the contract that he signed. The rest is really irrelevant to be honest.

Am not going to speak on a possibility, am speaking on a certainty (Which is Team Ruiz signed a contract that gave Team Joshua the power for a rematch as a thank you for getting a chance at the HW titles within 1 month of coming back into boxing).

If Team Ruiz wants to dishonour that contract then we all would see the consequences of that. Am sure they would try, people do get greedy you know, I don’t know if it’s an American thing but I remember Team Rahman (With Don King’s backing) trying to pull that too on Team Lewis. Guess what happened there?

After last weekend, I think "where" the fight takes place is very relevant!

[thesmokingman]

Everybody and his brother knew Johnson was doping, no way Pound was defending his cleanliness. If he defended him he did it in a legal way, the Canadian media hinted at Johnson being dirty and being in a drug camp but they couldn't out and out say it or their late coach would have sued the paper they wrote for.

I remember the year he won gold in Rome I was weightlifting in a gym and every muscle head was laughing their heads off at the notion of Johnson being clean, in fact one guy said what he was on......

So are you accusing me of lying? I'm not in the habit of presenting BS. And the fact is Pound was a fanboy of Johnson. And of course it was legal considering **** Pound is a freaking lawyer, duh.

https://www.wired.com/2007/01/pound/

Pound pulled Johnson aside in the only private space they could find – the bathroom in Pound's hotel suite. "Ben, are you on anything?" he asked. Johnson looked Pound straight in the eye. No, he said. He had no idea how the drugs could have ended up in his system.

Pound took the case. In the hearing, he argued that someone had sabotaged Johnson's sample or that it had been accidentally contaminated. But the scientific evidence was overwhelming. Blood tests showed that not only did Johnson have stanozolol in his system, his adrenal function was suppressed, indicating long-term steroid use. This was no glitch.

The verdict was swift: Johnson was stripped of his medal and suspended for two years. Three days earlier, Johnson had been a champion. Now he was a cheat.

The Johnson case was doping's mortal sin. Other Olympians had tested positive, but never a gold medalist in the premier event of the games. It was undeniable that drugs had permeated sports to their highest level and that sporting officials were lagging far behind.

The case also marked a turning point for Pound, who overnight went from romantic to cynic. "Most athletes, when they're caught, lie," Pound says today, the disappointment still fresh on his face. "Their coaches lie. The people around them lie. They just deny, deny, deny."

[MDPopescu]

... at this point is so easy for VADA to release a ped test result meant to send Whyte into oblivion...