Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shyte was on the good stuff.. he should fight Miller, no testing.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
      Im sure the conspiracy theorists believe that Hauser is making up what kind of drug it is too LOL
      Even worse... people probably believe this is a setup like someone spiked his drink. Or that these are fake reports

      Comment


      • If you're doing Dbol, a straight up bodybuilding oral steroid, the same one Arnold said he took, then you're not even trying.

        It's not like this is an injury recovery drug. This is the cheapest and most common steroid you can get.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by nghtmr111 View Post
          Even worse... people probably believe this is a setup like someone spiked his drink. Or that these are fake reports
          His fans are the same idiots that tried to claim there was some mystery as to why Ruiz beat AJ. These aren't boxing fans, they're UK fans.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by techliam View Post
            Canelo was busted for having a banned substance in his body

            He is responsible for that. It’s just something you’re going to have to get over.

            Out of general interest, why do you think that the most consistently pro-Canelo (and anti-Golovkin) posters are the ones who are most likely to exonerate him? I’d like to hear your thoughts on that
            Ftr even though I'm a big Canelo fan(partly because hes always demanded Vada from early on & is now on vada 365)

            I have defended every fighter/athlete popped for minimal amounts of clen while in Mexico since far before Canelo because I know its bs to not ban fighters from eating meat & still banning them for minimal amount of weakest ped on the list(clen is no longer a ban offense in higher dosages than nelo had).(most the list of banned peds don't serve any benefit for athletes of most sports,& Clen is the weakest of them all which countless clean athletes of every sport have popped dirty for)

            Why would canelo use tiny amount of clen out of competition yet demand vada when chavez jr demanded 3rd party lab? The truth is if you hate Canelo you'll use any excuse to discredit him even when facts don't back it up. He was rightfully cleared by all wbc/wba/wbo/ibf because there was clear precedents that exonerated him. Had he been popped with larger dosages hed have been subject to a minimum of a 1-2 yr ban by each sanctioning body. Instead he was required to submit to hair follicle test that also proved he wasn't taking anything else out of testing or it would've shown up. I defend who I think is being wrongfully accused I always have as I've done way before canelo when fighters get popped with minimal clen. Imagine having dinner at a high end restaurant with the president & being treated like a cheat because you demanded the most stringent testing,thats a travesty

            https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...is-summer.html

            https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/bo...rticle-6167753

            Comment


            • Originally posted by kushking View Post
              Ftr even though I'm a big Canelo fan(partly because hes always demanded Vada from early on & is now on vada 365)

              I have defended every fighter popped for minimal amounts of clen while in Mexico since far before Canelo because I know its bs to not ban fighters from eating meat & still banning them for minimal amount of weakest ped on the list(clen is no longer a ban offense in higher dosages than nelo had).(most the list of banned peds don't serve any benefit for athletes of most sports,& Clen is the weakest of them all which countless clean athletes of every sport have popped dirty for)

              Why would canelo use tiny amount of clen out of competition yet demand vada when chavez jr demanded 3rd party lab? The truth is if you hate Canelo you'll use any excuse to discredit him even when facts don't back it up. He was rightfully cleared by all wbc/wba/wbo/ibf because there was clear precedents that exonerated him. Had he been popped with larger dosages hed have been subject to a minimum of a 1-2 yr ban by each sanctioning body. Instead he was required to submit to hair follicle test that also proved he wasn't taking anything else out of testing or it would've shown up. I defend who I think is being wrongfully accused I always have as I've done way before canelo when fighters get popped with minimal clen. Imagine having dinner at a high end restaurant with the president & being treated like a cheat because you demanded the most stringent testing,thats a travesty

              https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...is-summer.html

              https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/bo...rticle-6167753
              Minimal amounts are common adverse findings, simply because you are much more likely to be reckless and assume you have cycled off.

              How much meat would you need to consume to produce that finding? And when were the tests taken? If those match up, then you have a solid point. Until then, he’s a former drug cheat

              Comment


              • my brotha taking the nasal spary. wont reveal the brand though

                Comment


                • I keep refreshing until Coppinger's story on this gets published

                  Comment


                  • where's my boy robbie at? lol!! Robbie Barrett

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by kushking View Post
                      Ftr even though I'm a big Canelo fan(partly because hes always demanded Vada from early on & is now on vada 365)

                      I have defended every fighter/athlete popped for minimal amounts of clen while in Mexico since far before Canelo because I know its bs to not ban fighters from eating meat & still banning them for minimal amount of weakest ped on the list(clen is no longer a ban offense in higher dosages than nelo had).(most the list of banned peds don't serve any benefit for athletes of most sports,& Clen is the weakest of them all which countless clean athletes of every sport have popped dirty for)

                      Why would canelo use tiny amount of clen out of competition yet demand vada when chavez jr demanded 3rd party lab? The truth is if you hate Canelo you'll use any excuse to discredit him even when facts don't back it up. He was rightfully cleared by all wbc/wba/wbo/ibf because there was clear precedents that exonerated him. Had he been popped with larger dosages hed have been subject to a minimum of a 1-2 yr ban by each sanctioning body. Instead he was required to submit to hair follicle test that also proved he wasn't taking anything else out of testing or it would've shown up. I defend who I think is being wrongfully accused I always have as I've done way before canelo when fighters get popped with minimal clen. Imagine having dinner at a high end restaurant with the president & being treated like a cheat because you demanded the most stringent testing,thats a travesty

                      https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...is-summer.html

                      https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/bo...rticle-6167753
                      I’m a huge Canelo fan but there is no excusing that. That’s strike 2 for me. I won’t give him any other passes. Strike 1 was that ****** sht MexiCANS don’t *** around nonsense he did in the ring.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP