Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Tests Positive For Banned Substance

[SchoolTheseCats]

Back to the OP:



... what he have here?... "Multiple sources have confirmed"...

... when one has "multiple sources" one should mention at least one source -- that's the rule in journalism...

... Neither VADA or UKAD (which were involved in PED testing) are mentioned as "sources"...

Vada or ukad can’t be mentioned as sources being as though they didn’t release info themselves which means someone leaked it to Hauser that works in testing agency or someone in Whyte camped that knew about it leaked it.... You don’t want to give away names of sources as journalists because then you can’t be trusted that’s rule 101 of basic journalism

[SchoolTheseCats]

Haymon making everyone fail drug tests, but couldn’t save Willie Monroe Jr lmfao

Idk why some of these u.k fanboys not all keep tying themselves in pretzels trying defend and deflect the L’s they been taking over last few months

[Straightener]

Can’t believe this.

I’m a Whyte fan but if he’s done this that’s it. He can’t box again.

As has been said if Rivas got hurt. What then?

I feel the same

Whyte is a likeable guy and a decent fighter but if he's been on the gear he deserves a long ban if not a lifetime ban

Hopefully there's a explanation or whytes career is over just as it was about to take off

[MDPopescu]

Back to the OP:
... what he have here?... "Multiple sources have confirmed"...

... when one has "multiple sources" one should mention at least one source -- that's the rule in journalism...

... Neither VADA or UKAD (which were involved in PED testing) are mentioned as "sources"...

Vada or ukad can’t be mentioned as sources being as though they didn’t release info themselves which means someone leaked it to Hauser that works in testing agency or someone in Whyte camped that knew about it leaked it.... You don’t want to give away names of sources as journalists because then you can’t be trusted that’s rule 101 of basic journalism

... so: you say that VADA and UKAD act in the deepest secrecy... they both don't provide (public) info and, therefore, they can't prevent tragedies in the ring (even when they would be liable)... OK, OK...

[Boxing Scene]

Doesnt matter just like it didnt matter with cheatmeatnelo. Boxing is a joke.

[Boxing Scene]

I feel the same

Whyte is a likeable guy and a decent fighter but if he's been on the gear he deserves a long ban if not a lifetime ban

Hopefully there's a explanation or whytes career is over just as it was about to take off

Yeah there's an explanation. He ***n cheated like cheatmeatnelo. And he'll lie just like him too and get away with it.

[SchoolTheseCats]

I feel the same

Whyte is a likeable guy and a decent fighter but if he's been on the gear he deserves a long ban if not a lifetime ban

Hopefully there's a explanation or whytes career is over just as it was about to take off

I appreciate real boxing fans from u.k like you that say if it’s true he need be banned and not trying come up with 100million excuses or start blaming other people for Whyte testing positive.... we usually don’t agree when it comes aj/wilder situations but much respect to you for not trying defend the foolery

[SchoolTheseCats]

... so: you say that VADA and UKAD act in the deepest secrecy... they both don't provide (public) info and, therefore, they can't prevent tragedies in the ring (even when they would be liable)... OK, OK...

Vada do report failed tests to public if it was the ones that administrated the test the fighter failed.....

The ukad do not it’s in they protocols that a boxer can request they b sample be tested before they release info to public and hand down a ban


Under rules in place in the United Kingdom, Whyte has a right of appeal. UKAD takes the position that, until the adjudication process is over and due process is complete, there has not been a finding that a fighter is in breach of its PED protocols and no sanctions can be put in place by the British Boxing Board of Control. The adjudication process often begins with the testing of a fighter's "B" sample, which can generally be done in 24 to 48 hours. But it often drags on for more than a year. The National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP), an independent entity, is responsible for the final adjudication of PED disputes.

Under VADA protocols, the positive test result would have been reported to the World Boxing Council and Rivas camp. That appears to have not been the case in this instance with UKAD.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Miller, Fury, Ortiz, Povetkin, Whyte...who is next?

[GlassJoey]

Blatantly going to be weed or CBD when the test comes back