I love people arguing P4P. It is SO subjective. I have Usyk #1, Lomachenko #2, and am seriously pondering moving Spence ahead of Crawford, with Inoye, Regis Prograis, the top 3 126 fighters (Santa Cruz, Frampton, Russell JR), and a few others popping around my top 10. But I put a lot more into "eye test" than most. And I do not have any problems with anyone else P4P, just love to hear the debates. They are a good time.
But we all can agree Campbell is a top 10 guy with a win over Lomachenko, and not even in the top 20 conversation without it, right? I mean he is a fine boxer and all, but out of the thousands of boxer in the dozens of divisions, he needs a little more to get there. Lomachenko is definitely "more".
But we all can agree Campbell is a top 10 guy with a win over Lomachenko, and not even in the top 20 conversation without it, right? I mean he is a fine boxer and all, but out of the thousands of boxer in the dozens of divisions, he needs a little more to get there. Lomachenko is definitely "more".
Comment