Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao-Keith Thurman: Afterthoughts

[marikudo]

I think you got it wrong. It’s the other way around. They gave Pacquiao the rounds he dominated which iare 1-5 and 10 and they gave every close ones to Thurman. I gave Thurman 3 rounds that he was able to squeak out.

I agree. I also gave Thurman 3 rounds.

[Manic Shot]

After the 1st round I knew ( and I’m sure Keith knew) that Thurman made a major mistake by no opting for VADA testing. PAC could’ve fought another 12 rounds

Watch out for Thurman's suspension. I smell something!

[Bluebird]

After the 1st round I knew ( and I’m sure Keith knew) that Thurman made a major mistake by no opting for VADA testing. PAC could’ve fought another 12 rounds

The better fighter won, take it like a man. Why didn’t you protest when B-hop and Foreman beat their younger opponents? Boxing doesn’t discriminate, ignorant people like you do!

[lacson]

After the 1st round I knew ( and I’m sure Keith knew) that Thurman made a major mistake by no opting for VADA testing. PAC could’ve fought another 12 rounds

Pacquiao has been under vada for years. 365 days a year they can come anytime and test. I don’t think thurman is.

[lacson]

Pacquiao is under vada. Thurman i don’ think so.

[kdd]

Yeah I agree. I was kinda shocked after to see the majority of people talking as if it was a one sided beat down. Even Spence said it was an ass whooping.

It was an extremely close, hyper competitive fight. Manny had to walk through hell to eek out the W. To me the difference was the knockdown and the body shot in the 10th that hurt Thurman.

Cuz fighters know what a beat down is.. doesn’t matter what the judges say.. fighters like Errol, porter, broner, etc ... it was ass beating.. the score could be 114-114 Ass beating is ass beating

[jvsnypes]

So, what rounds did Thurman dominate Pacquiao?

I don’t think Keith dominated any round, and that’s why Many won 7 rounds on 2 of the cards. Punch stats show Keith out landed him, so he had to control some of the rounds. Punch stats also showed that Keith landed more punches on Manny than any previous opponents. I’m not big on compubox stats, but they obviously saw what I saw.

[Bronx2245]

Only problem is if he fights Terrence Crawford in his next fight then he'll be 0 for 2. I guess we could call him 2 times at that point.

He'll be "0 for 2," but he'll be in back-to-back PPVs! That's how you cash out! Why risk getting beat up by fighters like Josesito Lopez for little money, when you can take an azz whooping from Bud for much more money?

[patostar89]

It was a great win for Manny, the fight was really great and entertaining, but props to Keith, he fought great too, but manny is on another level, I am a big fan of keith right now, the way he accepted his loss, manny should stay away from Crawford and Spence, he can beat mikey, danny and porter, but Bud and spence are too much for manny at this age, he will be 41 in the next 3 or 4 months.

[patostar89]

Pacquiao has been under vada for years. 365 days a year they can come anytime and test. I don’t think thurman is.

Hell yeah, manny has always been tested negative for peds and steroids, only haters and floydsexuals hate on manny.