6 rounds each? Keith knew round one is why he loss big time!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao-Keith Thurman: Afterthoughts
Collapse
-
Originally posted by jvsnypes View PostThe fight was very good and much closer than many are claiming. We are mesmerized by the fact that a legendary fighter performed very well against an undefeated champion. But to watch the fight 2 or 3 times, the fight was highly competitive, and the only clearly dominating rounds by Manny were 1,2, and 10. The judges obviously gave the close rounds to Manny as well. But when facing a legend like Manny, Keith was not only facing the icon, but the mystique as well. To get a draw he would of had to win 10 rounds. I don’t have a problem with the results, but the commentators were biased and did a poor job. By no means did Manny outclass Keith. Keith did a great job. If it was any other opponent, with that performance, the outcome could have been in his favor. It was a great fight at an elite level. But at this point, I don’t see either beating Spence or Crawford. I think Manny will end up fighting Mikey or Danny next. I see Keith fighting either AB or Ugas.
Comment
-
I’m hearing they did no VADA testing for this fight...is that true?!?...Not insinuating anything but I thought the testing was mandatory for these days
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dle View PostAfter the 1st round I knew ( and I’m sure Keith knew) that Thurman made a major mistake by no opting for VADA testing. PAC could’ve fought another 12 rounds
Comment
-
Originally posted by jvsnypes View PostThe fight was very good and much closer than many are claiming. We are mesmerized by the fact that a legendary fighter performed very well against an undefeated champion. But to watch the fight 2 or 3 times, the fight was highly competitive, and the only clearly dominating rounds by Manny were 1,2, and 10. The judges obviously gave the close rounds to Manny as well. But when facing a legend like Manny, Keith was not only facing the icon, but the mystique as well. To get a draw he would of had to win 10 rounds. I don’t have a problem with the results, but the commentators were biased and did a poor job. By no means did Manny outclass Keith. Keith did a great job. If it was any other opponent, with that performance, the outcome could have been in his favor. It was a great fight at an elite level. But at this point, I don’t see either beating Spence or Crawford. I think Manny will end up fighting Mikey or Danny next. I see Keith fighting either AB or Ugas.Last edited by P4P Forever; 07-23-2019, 02:59 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jvsnypes View PostThe fight was very good and much closer than many are claiming. We are mesmerized by the fact that a legendary fighter performed very well against an undefeated champion. But to watch the fight 2 or 3 times, the fight was highly competitive, and the only clearly dominating rounds by Manny were 1,2, and 10. The judges obviously gave the close rounds to Manny as well. But when facing a legend like Manny, Keith was not only facing the icon, but the mystique as well. To get a draw he would of had to win 10 rounds. I don’t have a problem with the results, but the commentators were biased and did a poor job. By no means did Manny outclass Keith. Keith did a great job. If it was any other opponent, with that performance, the outcome could have been in his favor. It was a great fight at an elite level. But at this point, I don’t see either beating Spence or Crawford. I think Manny will end up fighting Mikey or Danny next. I see Keith fighting either AB or Ugas.
Comment
-
I wanted Pacquiao to beat Thurman up so bad on fight night because of all the trash talk lol. I'm glad Pacquiao proved everyone wrong. But I want to give props to Thurman. I've always liked him and still do. The man just spoke to much crap in the build up. But he acted like a champ after the fight. He hardly made any excuses besides hinting at the long layoff which wasn't as much of an issue as some people want to make. If you remember clearly, he looked good against Lopez before he was stunned in the 7th. I don't think the fight merits a rematch. It was wider than a split decision in my opinion but not a shoutout. It was fun, entertaining, and competitive. I was on the edge of my seat from the moment the fighters made their way to the ring.
But in the aftermath, I hope Pacquiao stays away from Spence or Crawford. I'm not counting him out against either way, but the risk is greater than the reward in my opinion. Pacquiao has nothing left to prove. And fans that are clamouring for a Spence/Crawford clash need to sit down. The man is a legend, but he's 40 years old and has every right to dictate who he wants to fight next. Maybe ya'll should have this much energy demanding a Spence/Crawford clash.
Comment
-
Pacquiao was dominating Thurman the first five rounds and suddenly he eased up. I and a lot of others couldn’t figure out why he eased up. Then Pacquiao in an interview after the fight mentioned that he relaxed a bit because he wanted to time him, and he said that’s why Thurman was able to take advantage.
He didn’t say it straight out but what that means for people who knows boxing was he was trying for the knockout.
Comment
Comment