The fact that there was no drug testing for saturday's fight is kinda weird

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Divine Hammer
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2013
    • 7661
    • 376
    • 4
    • 37,824

    #41
    read the thread title.

    there was testing. case closed.

    Originally posted by ikigai
    My stance has been the exact same since the beginning lol. You're trying to win a ****flght, i'm trying to raise questions about a strange sotuation, where Pacquiao opted not to have standard vada protocol testing at the beginning of training camp.

    You only believe you gained any ground because you posted an invalid link which itself said they only began testing at the end of training camp, and you're attacking me on semantics, which nobody gives a shlt about except you and other people who want to white knight Pacquiao because they worship him.

    Comment

    • llll
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2019
      • 2761
      • 142
      • 29
      • 63,036

      #42
      Originally posted by MDPopescu
      It's simple:

      ... just when the VADA testing started for this fight (precise date)?
      ... what are the VADA testing results after the fight?...

      ... simple questions...
      The only evidence we have that there was drug testing, is that a team from vada collected some samples at the end of training camp.

      VADA announced in june they would not be overseeing the testing in this fight.



      The latter question, nobody knows yet.

      Comment

      • MDPopescu
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2012
        • 24153
        • 1,504
        • 2,009
        • 4,138,611

        #43
        Originally posted by MDPopescu
        It's simple:

        ... just when the VADA testing started for this fight (precise date)?
        ... what are the VADA testing results after the fight?...

        ... simple questions...

        Originally posted by ikigai
        The only evidence we have that there was drug testing, is that a team from vada collected some samples at the end of training camp.

        VADA announced in june they would not be overseeing the testing in this fight.



        The latter question, nobody knows yet.
        ... I do know the "situation" here... that's precisely why I put the "simple questions" above...

        Comment

        • mlac
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2014
          • 20293
          • 1,620
          • 1,473
          • 210,093

          #44
          Originally posted by ikigai
          Dude im not racist or biased, i call it how it is

          There was not standard drug testing for this fight. They only had tests at the end of training camp. Standard testing is at least at the beginning of training camp

          I don't give two shlts about person's skin color or where they're from.
          well because you picked thurman to win, and when he lost you are insinuating pac only won because hes on PEDS

          We know Pac and what he can do, he is a legend. Thurman performed well above his previous performance when he nearly got stopped by a journeyman....so why isnt he on PEDS?

          And why only make this thread after pac wins? why not after charlo wins? or any other high profile fighter that does not do VADA, or do you give the benefit of the doubt to only certain fighters?

          Comment

          • Eddy Current
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2017
            • 8720
            • 297
            • 406
            • 143,787

            #45
            I think Thurman was so thrilled with his huge purse that he was willing to let Manny take PEDs

            Comment

            • Doctor_Tenma
              Monster
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 33313
              • 1,327
              • 1,249
              • 58,127

              #46
              This is what I know, Pacquiao looked a lot better than he has in recent years, especially in his legs which was the very thing that was leaving him. I don't doubt most of my favorite fighters are on something but I ain't gonna pretend like I aint see that shit.

              Comment

              • Jsmooth9876
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2014
                • 12209
                • 2,297
                • 365
                • 72,745

                #47
                Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma
                This is what I know, Pacquiao looked a lot better than he has in recent years, especially in his legs which was the very thing that was leaving him. I don't doubt most of my favorite fighters are on something but I ain't gonna pretend like I aint see that shit.
                His legs looked great for a handful of rounds then he looked like a 40 year old fighter in there. He's got enough in him still to look electric for 5 or 6 rounds then he slows down. He had nothing left when he hurt Thurman late with that body shot.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP