Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Photos: Pacquiao Drops, Decisions Thurman - MONSTER Gallery

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by TheClap View Post
    Maybe nobody is good. Maybe the four horsemen were not as elite as they are made out to be. Maybe you're blowing smoke out of your exhaust
    Are there in hybrid made vehicles in Africa, just curious?

    Comment


    • #32
      Would like to see Khan get KTFO.....

      Comment


      • #33
        Pac faded and should have put him away after the body shot. He got old the 2nd half of the fight. Hard work, experience and The Lord gave him that great performance. He will look awful in his next fight. He left it in the ring last night. Time to retire on top. It will never be the same. We will never see anything like him again. I prefer him over the defensive wizard any day. All his fights were offence. The haters are just miserable people. How could anyone not like this legend. Please retire, there nothing left in the tank and there's nothing more to achieve.

        Comment


        • #34
          Thurman got crucified

          Comment


          • #35
            Pac did not fade, it was because of the heavy hands of thurman. Look at the punch stats! He really felt it. The amazing part is, he was really special and went to fight til the last round. He is really a freak of nature..

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by markther View Post
              When I saw Thurman get dropped in the 1st round and hurt to the body in the 10th, I immediately thought Crawford or Spence would have done the same thing, possibly getting him out of there. That version of Thurman wasn’t the same one before the injury when he fought Garcia or Porter.

              Or maybe, just maybe, a 40 year old PAC exposed that Thurman isn’t really that good after all or that Porter or Garcia aren’t that good. So I’m not falling for the smoke and mirrors of last nights win. It was a tremendous win for PAC at 40 and adds to his legacy and all time greatness. But Spence and Crawford would have dominated that version of Thurman last night also in more convincing fashion I believe. And I believe both would beat PAC who would be over 40 years old by the time either of those fights are scheduled. Until I see Spence and Crawford not dominate an opponent in the ring, I have to get them the edge over a 40 something year old PAC.
              All this talk about Spence and Crawford dominating a top 10 welterweight needs to stop until they actually fight top 10 welterweights.

              Spence is taking a good step in fighting Porter, but Crawford has a long way to go to proving how great he is at welterweight.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Bryont View Post
                Pac did not fade, it was because of the heavy hands of thurman. Look at the punch stats! He really felt it. The amazing part is, he was really special and went to fight til the last round. He is really a freak of nature..
                I'm a big Thurman fan but let's be real here. Age played a part here. Prime Pacquiao takes the Thurman from July 20th out. There's no shame in that, prime Pacquiao is considered one the best ever.

                Comment


                • #38
                  If thurman truly wants a rematch with manny then he should face the winner of spence/porter

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by KayDub View Post
                    All this talk about Spence and Crawford dominating a top 10 welterweight needs to stop until they actually fight top 10 welterweights.

                    Spence is taking a good step in fighting Porter, but Crawford has a long way to go to proving how great he is at welterweight.
                    I have a feeling you actually posted this with a straight face. When people say that Spence and Crawford can dominate welterweights, they are probably sizing them up against the current crop of welterweights in the division. Here they are below. Kindly tell us out of this group who you believe Spence and Crawford would not dominate. And don’t change your narrative or statement after reviewing this list because your original point is based on the top welterweights in the division.

                    And quick question for you, where was Kell Brook ranked when he fought Spence with only (1) loss on his record moving up in weight against GGG when their fight took place?

                    And where was the then undefeated Jeff Horn ranked by the time he fought Crawford?


                    Top Ten Welterweights not named Spence or Crawford...

                    Manny Pacquiao
                    Keith Thurman
                    Shawn Porter
                    Danny Garcia
                    Yordenis Ugas
                    Jessie Vargas
                    Egidijus Kavaliauskas
                    Jamal James

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by T.M.T View Post
                      Great win for Pacquiao who no doubt is one of the all time greats. Hopefully he doesn't duck Spence again. P.B.C. Is the boxing boss 🥊
                      Spence needs to prove himself and establish a fanbase. 360k ppv buys as a B side is not how you get to fight an ATG.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP