How Petty was The PBC For This?

[Rip Chudd]

Because they were showing the current champions.

Adam Smith who is head of boxing at Sky and a commentator has no problem saying he thinks Fury is the no.1 Heavyweight right now and said his last outing was very entertaining during the Whyte fight last night, despite Fury being on a rival network.

No point in insulting the fans intelligence with petty things like this.

PBC also fail to acknowledge how previous fights went to try and big up a future fight. Not once did they mention last night that most people thought Ugas beat Porter. The way Goosen was talking, you would think Porter schooled Ugas. Probably because Porter has a PPV coming up.

If PBC doesn't want to show a champion due to him being on a rival network and promoter then they don't have to. The only people on here crying about it are you lot. Was it petty? Yes. But they aren't obligated to show or spend time on any other fighters but their own, especially on a PPV broadcast

[Rip Chudd]

Cant believe there are people trying to defend this and to say they dont want to waste money on a graphic is really scraping that barrel.

Who is defending it? I'm telling you simple fools why they would do it. I said myself that it's petty. Can you fools read?

[DaBeastO]

They don't want to waste their time or money on a graphic for a fighter that isn't on their roster or a part of any promotion they are doing. I don't know why it's so hard for people to understand that. The point is to highlight their own people, not another promoter's, no matter if he's a champion or not. It's really that simple

lol money? thats the excuse? that's pathetic and it makes pbc and fox look like a two bit boxing network

[DaNeutral.]

Who is defending it? I'm telling you simple fools why they would do it. I said myself that it's petty. Can you fools read?

We all know why they did it and it isnt to save money on graphics, If thats what you are going to use to say why they did it, when we all know damn well why they did it, thats you defending it.

[Rip Chudd]

lol money? thats the excuse? that's pathetic and it makes pbc and fox look like a two bit boxing network

I agree, but it's their money and their broadcast. If we don't like it we don't have to watch their broadcasts. Simple. Cause all they are going to do is show their own people unless a deal is worked out where the rival fighter comes to their network for a fight. C'mon people this is Al Haymon, let's not act like we just heard about him yesterday

[Rip Chudd]

We all know why they did it and it isnt to save money on graphics, If thats what you are going to use to say why they did it, when we all know damn well why they did it, thats you defending it.

I didn't even mention the graphics, the other poster did and I brought up a reason why they wouldn't want to make a graphic for another fighter. If you weren't stuck on ****** you would actually be able to comprehend what I"m saying instead of jumping headfirst into a conversation with your blinders on. Again, I said myself that it was petty. Now read that last sentence again slowly then go jump off a bridge. SMH

[DaNeutral.]

I didn't even mention the graphics, the other poster did and I brought up a reason why they wouldn't want to make a graphic for another fighter. If you weren't stuck on ****** you would actually be able to comprehend what I"m saying instead of jumping headfirst into a conversation with your blinders on. Again, I said myself that it was petty. Now read that last sentence again slowly then go jump off a bridge. SMH

LOL, i see your game. You know its near enough indefensible , its blatantly obvious why they did it so you dont want to appear to be defending the indefensible but because you are such a PBC junky you just have to defend it. Just saying. We can smell you shills from a mile away.

[Rip Chudd]

LOL, i see your game. You know its near enough indefensible , its blatantly obvious why they did it so you dont want to appear to be defending the indefensible but because you are such a PBC junky you just have to defend it. Just saying. We can smell you shills from a mile away.

Again, who is defending it? Please show me anywhere in my posts where I have said it was a good idea or defended it. I literally said I can see WHY they did it and how petty it is. But go ahead bro, read what you want. You're obviously too ****** to have an adult conversation with. Run along lad

[Marchegiano]

A really unimportant fact.

If it's petty the **** are you doing crying about it?

[Ray*]

it's al gaymon not being able to control the wbo and he's pissed and shunning the wbo belt! here's a theory al gaymon tried to bribe the wbo and they told him to *** off. remember the pbc shill who used to post here with user name wbc wba ibf? Who lied about working for them he used to always trash the wbo.

That makes sense, I would look into it. Because I wouldn’t be shocked if they tried to control the WBO like they do the WBC and they didn’t get a good response, because the way they left out the WBO belt like it doesn’t exist is quite laughable. And yeah I remember that WBA/WBC guy he has a new alt here now (DARTHsomething) or whatever it is, the moment I knew it was him I blocked him right away.