Pac s best of era. I still can't believe some people using flouds unbeaten record to put a case for him being best of era considering as far as people concerned Floyd lost at least a couple of times?
Firstly,
1)Being unbeaten don't make you best of era.
2) Having win over best of era doesn't make you best of era.
Not fighting abroad certainly is a barrier to be best of era. Not having as in depth resume as the best of era is also a barrier to being considered the best of era
Pac s best of era. I still can't believe some people using flouds unbeaten record to put a case for him being best of era considering as far as people concerned Floyd lost at least a couple of times?
Firstly,
1)Being unbeaten don't make you best of era.
2) Having win over best of era doesn't make you best of era.
Not fighting abroad certainly is a barrier to be best of era. Not having as in depth resume as the best of era is also a barrier to being considered the best of era
Dam youre backward,,, Floyd beat Manny and the current MW SMW WC and was never beaton, and he beat many common opponents at weights Manny was scared to go near them with and he schooled the guy that KOed Manny , you aint winning no best anything chump.
You can talk sht all you want and will not change history one iota.
Dam youre backward,,, Floyd beat Manny and the current MW SMW WC and was never beaton, and he beat many common opponents at weights Manny was scared to go near them with and he schooled the guy that KOed Manny , you aint winning no best anything chump.
You can talk sht all you want and will not change history one iota.
Pac s 8 division titles and historical win over thurman is better than anything Floyd done.
Yes, he has some losses. But losses don't matter as much as you want them to.
There are many, many reasons that can contribute to a loss as well as many reasons why you'd be unbeaten, a nd rarely is it because your too good
Pac s 8 division titles and historical win over thurman is better than anything Floyd done
Says you lol, minus the CWs bogas titles 2 ko loses and 7 defeats, bring it all into perspective and his career is man made through very careful selection of wounded soldiers then they drained hem to make sure.
I love how Thurman has been elevated to such greatness lol, Floyd would school Thurman as easy as he did JMM, way way to slow and wide for Floyd.
Thurman was off for 2 yrs after major sugery had one fight and looked like sht thats why Manny picked him after running away from Spence, there is ALWAYS an Asterisk attached to Mannys fights and true to form Thurman had one as well.
I love how Thurman has been elevated to such greatness lol, Floyd would school Thurman as easy as he did JMM, .
I love how cw green (never fought, let alone beat anyone of note) not in prime kid, nelo has been elevated to greatness.
Floyd, woulda, coulda, but Pac actually did. You always get more credit for doing
I love how cw green (never fought, let alone beat anyone of note) not in prime kid, nelo has been elevated to greatness.
Floyd, w oulda, coulda, but Pac did.
Thats the thing Manny didnt, he has so many asterisks around the fights that you ignore, a 145 Oscar vs a 160 Oscar Floyd beat is just one of them, you are a dimwit that was butt hurt when Floyd stopped Hatton and you havent stopped crying since.
Even Thurman had a massive question mark hanging over him thats why he was chosen over Spence, you realise Manny called Spence out and then sht himself when Spence said lets go, boom Thurman looks sht in his fight so Manny says lets fight him, its always been the same with Manny he has a great matchmaking team thats for sure.
Even Thurman had a massive question mark hanging over him thats why he was chosen Thurman looks sht in his fight so Manny says lets fight him, its always been the same with Manny he has a great matchmaking team thats for sure.
Nel o had question marks because hed never beat anyone before floyd. At least thurman had.
Many WW champs I'm sure In history have looked garbage but no 40 year old could beat father time and beat the weak era of WWs champs over years. The WW division happens to be stacked currently with talent, not a weak era by a long shot.
There have been weak champions coming off poor performances in all divisions so why didn't Floyd take advantage with sergio?
Floyd s not a risk taker so deserves no rewards. His reward is his unbeaten record. Nothing more than that
Nel o had question marks because hed never beat anyone before floyd. At least thurman had.
Many WWs I'm sure In history have looked garbage but no 40 year old could beat father time and beat the weak era of WWs over years. The WW division happens to be stacked currently with talent, not a weak era by a long shot.
There have been weak champions coming off poor performances in all divisions so why didn't Floyd take advantage with sergio?
Floyd s not a risk taker so deserves no rewards. His reward is his unbeaten record. Nothing more than that
Canelo was nothing and a broken Thurman is great, just fck of you idiot.
Canelo was nothing and a broken Thurman is great, just fck of you idiot.
Nelo was a cw. Why did Floyd use it? ATG boxers in past have given up advantages. Floyd was retiring soon so what's with CW? Seriously, what was with the CW? He was a kid!
Thurman wasn't broken. Pacs bad shoulder was every bit as bad as Thurman's. PAC or people don't go on about PACs injuries. Get over it.
Comment