Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lets speak FACTS. Hopkins, DLH & Pacquiao all rank higher than Floyd historically

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
    So you list is Zab Judah



    Floyd fought PLENTY of top welters

    FACT: Zab was a LOT better than Thurman

    just saying

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
      Not the question I asked.

      What are you afraid of.

      I'm asking you your opinion, and you are afraid to give it.

      What is up with that?



      I answered our question MANY times, plain as day

      I think that taking a loss is worse than dopey pac-tards making stuff up
      your question is rubbish, you completely made that stuff up

      I plss on your question

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
        Floyd fought PLENTY of top welters

        FACT: Zab was a LOT better than Thurman

        just saying

        List them.

        All the elite welters he beat in their prime.
        Last edited by D4thincarnation; 07-21-2019, 10:31 PM.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
          List them.

          All the elite welter he beat in their prime.



          beating Judah, Mosley when he was ranked #1, Marquez, and Pacquiao..... MURDER pac's resume at welter

          MURDER !!

          it is not even close

          the level-below..... Ortiz, Guerrero, Maidana..... are also much better than the lower-level guys pac fought at 147..... like Rios, Algieri, Vargas

          name pac's elite welter he beat in their prime?

          Bradley ?

          if you say Thurman you are getting torched son, you do know that right?

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            beating Judah, Mosley when he was ranked #1, Marquez, and Pacquiao..... MURDER pac's resume at welter

            MURDER !!

            it is not even close

            the level-below..... Ortiz, Guerrero, Maidana..... are also much better than the lower-level guys pac fought at 147..... like Rios, Algieri, Vargas

            name pac's elite welter he beat in their prime?

            Bradley ?

            if you say Thurman you are getting torched son, you do know that right?
            Bradley > maidana, ortiz, berto, guerrero, mcgregor

            prime thurman > 2010 mosley

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by BIG GUNZ View Post
              I think the only one you can argue is Pacquiao due to all his accomplishments. But I think due to his 50-0 record Floyd will probably go down as being considered the greater fighter.
              i don't see giving too much weight on floyd's 50 - 0 a really defining measure of his greatness...

              is 50 - 0 the measuring stick for staying undefeated?

              others have stayed undefeated far far more than 50 fights...

              what i am pointing out is that if a guy loses on his 89th fight does it make his 88 wins immaterial on the issue of greatness?

              if floyd continued to fight for say 20 more fights, is it a given that he will win all 20?

              just asking...

              Comment


              • #87
                The only one on that list who could feasibly rank higher is Pacquiao due to his accomplishments and longevity. DLH also gets a little bit underrated I feel when you consider the guys he beat and lost to (but always fought) in his/their prime.

                Overall though Mayweather deserves to rank highest of all those names.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Wrong mayweather is the best of all time.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Post
                    i don't see giving too much weight on floyd's 50 - 0 a really defining measure of his greatness...

                    is 50 - 0 the measuring stick for staying undefeated?

                    others have stayed undefeated far far more than 50 fights...

                    what i am pointing out is that if a guy loses on his 89th fight does it make his 88 wins immaterial on the issue of greatness?

                    if floyd continued to fight for say 20 more fights, is it a given that he will win all 20?

                    just asking...
                    I think the best way to put it is Pacquiao has had the better career but Mayweather is the better fighter. I just think that Mayweather will go ahead of Pacquiao though on an all time P4P list since he beat him pretty easily & having the undefeated record. There’s other fighters that stayed undefeated for a long time but how many big names do they have on their resume?

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by Bandman View Post
                      DLH never ducked a soul or marinated a damn thing.

                      same for Bhop.

                      same for Pacman.

                      the marinating era began with Mayweather.

                      oh yeah.. ALL HAIL BOSSNELO. happy birthday champ
                      Here is how we know Floyd ranks ahead of all 3-whenever there is "the next big thing"-whether it be Canelo, Lomachenko, AJ, etc-posters like you and others always compare them to Floyd, never the other 3.

                      If any of you REALLY thought Floyd wasn't the best of his generation or best since SRL/Hagler/Duran then you'd use another fighter as the measuring stick.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP