Comments Thread For: Ellerbe: Floyd's Very Content; No Interest In Pacquiao Rematch

[4truth]

LMAO Mayweather is and always will be a better fighter DEAL WITH IT!!!Also don't bother sending me another book length post I will not even read them.

I think I see the problem. Enjoy your ignorance.

[IMG]https://media1.*****.com/media/2dcW1Dlu2sZnW/source.gif[/IMG]

[hugh grant]

But if Manny beats Thurman does that not make Floyds win over him even better since he is still beating top fighters?

Again, not really because Floyd beat weakest version of pac if you even thought floyd actually won that is because.many don't think Floyd won. Lots of controversy that win. IV gate, and bad shoulder, controversial decision, I could go on and on. Randolph turpin didn't live off of His win over srr, and rjj didn't live off of His win over bh. So why talk of Floyd potentially living off of a controversial Pac win? What's that all about in fact? So Pac not only beat Miguel cotto, Pac beat Sergio Martinez also did he?

He didn’t get robbed when he got ktfo or when Morales or Horn beat him. He didn’t get robbed in the draws he had. There was no controversy when Floyd beat him.
n.

It took jmm 4 attempts but Floyd wouldn't know about that as he takes money and runs doesn't give opponents another chance to beat him let alone triologies! Floyd don't know meaning. Pac was only a one arm fighter he first lost to morales. Again you see Pac was WIP for much of his career yet achieved so much, more than Floyd could ever do.

[Htown-Finest]

I’m not interested either .

[The Big Dunn]

Again, not really because Floyd beat weakest version of pac if you even thought floyd actually won that is because.many don't think Floyd won. Lots of controversy that win. IV gate, and bad shoulder, controversial decision, I could go on and on. Randolph turpin didn't live off of His win over srr, and rjj didn't live off of His win over bh. So why talk of Floyd potentially living off of a controversial Pac win? What's that all about in fact? So Pac not only beat Miguel cotto, Pac beat Sergio Martinez also did he?



It took jmm 4 attempts but Floyd wouldn't know about that as he takes money and runs doesn't give opponents another chance to beat him let alone triologies! Floyd don't know meaning. Pac was only a one arm fighter he first lost to morales. Again you see Pac was WIP for much of his career yet achieved so much, more than Floyd could ever do.

Floyd has far better wins than Manny. The Manny win is equal to the Berto win because as you said Manny is just a past prime former flyweight.

Floyd always is and always will be ranked ahead of Manny in every credible ranking. Wake me when that changes.

[The Big Dunn]

But if Manny beats Thurman does that not make Floyds win over him even better since he is still beating top fighters?

Read his posts Larry. He is to cowardly to post it but he is suggesting Manny was great at every point in his careers except the one day he fought Floyd.

When someone gerrymanders manny’s whole career like that you know you are dealing with one of the very worst p@ctards.

[hugh grant]

Floyd has far better wins than Manny. The Manny win is equal to the Berto win because as you said Manny is just a past prime former flyweight.

Floyd always is and always will be ranked ahead of Manny in every credible ranking. Wake me when that changes.

Yes that Pac win for floyd is dismissed its a nothing win yet is still floyds best win, mainly because of Pac s bad shoulder, Iv gate and being a controversial decision amongst other things. That's how lacking depth Floyd resume is. Floyd always fights weakest versions. Floyd s nelo win is equal to Floyds win over baldomir, considering how drained and green nelo was, and Floyds jmm win is equal to his gatti win, considering how bloated jmm was and with Floyd cheating scales. Floyd never gives rematch unless people think he loses also and Floyd doesn't know what t riologies are. Floyds only awareness of triologies is to movies.

[sargo]

Leave Mayweather and his fans alone. That is their mentality. Defend the fighting style of excessive holding, running, even sucker punching. Defend dictating terms of fights in their favor. Don't give a rematch because Floyd already won. Insist the win was conclusive despite evidence shown that it was not.

Just let Manny continue writing his legendary story of facing challenges Floyd avoided or would avoid, even now that he is 40. That former rivals, legends themselves, openly show him support. He may get knocked out again, or god forbid even get badly hurt, but he would not hesitate to go for greatness in the ring, not rely on twisting facts, making exaggerations, speaking negatively of his peers and fighting purely just for the money including MMA fighters in boxing matches.

[pasawayako]

Floyd isn't interested to rematch pac but he is interested with another MMA fighter. lmao.

[john l]

Floyd has far better wins than Manny. The Manny win is equal to the Berto win because as you said Manny is just a past prime former flyweight.

Floyd always is and always will be ranked ahead of Manny in every credible ranking. Wake me when that changes.

The pac fanboys will be out in force after beating a inactive Thruman. That win don't come close to May win over Canelo.

[The Big Dunn]

The pac fanboys will be out in force after beating a inactive Thruman. That win don't come close to May win over Canelo.

I think you treat posters based on what they write.

IMO the Thurman win is a very good win and is great for Manny and the sport. Shows how great he is. Now if you get the slimy Manny fans that want to use this win to discredit Floyd, then give them the same as they give-don't give Manny any credit.

Truly sad that this board has so many disgraceful cretins that behave like Hugh Grant and diving hammer.