Comments Thread For: Pernell Whitaker - CompuBox Looks Back

[aboutfkntime]

See, you couldn't answer my question. Your boy is the only one who keeps losing via compubox stats in multiple fights (4 to be exact) and still doesn't take an L. No other fighter has been able to override compubox stats consistently like your idol. That's why you hate compubox.. It exploits the judges favoritism of Canelo and that hurts your v@gina.

PLENTY of fighters won, despite having lower compubox stats

get a clue you fkn dropkick

if you rely on compubox for ANYTHING..... then this is not the sport for you

what sort of fkn idiot needs to check compubox to tell him who a fight that he watched with his own two eyes?

you casuals are morons

[TonyGe]

PLENTY of fighters won, despite having lower compubox stats

get a clue you fkn dropkick

if you rely on compubox for ANYTHING..... then this is not the sport for you

what sort of fkn idiot needs to check compubox to tell him who a fight that he watched with his own two eyes?

you casuals are morons

So do you think Sweet Pea did or didn't score as Compubox indicated. I've watched his fights and I agree that Compubox is generally correct in their record keeping concerning Whittaker. The thread is about Pernell not if you agree with compubox as a tool.. In this specific case are they right or wrong in their assessment of him versus his peers.

[Jab jab boom]

PLENTY of fighters won, despite having lower compubox stats

get a clue you fkn dropkick

if you rely on compubox for ANYTHING..... then this is not the sport for you

what sort of fkn idiot needs to check compubox to tell him who a fight that he watched with his own two eyes?

you casuals are morons

wait, was that even English that you typed above? Either way, you're 60 yrs old and you've been watching boxing since the 60s, yet you can't name 1 other fighter who has been out landed overall and round by round on compubox in 4 different fights yet still didn't lose? Further proof that compubox stats hold validity and your lame attempt to discredit it because you're a Canelo groupie proves how pathetic you are.

[aboutfkntime]

So do you think Sweet Pea did or didn't score as Compubox indicated. I've watched his fights and I agree that Compubox is generally correct in their record keeping concerning Whittaker. The thread is about Pernell not if you agree with compubox as a tool.. In this specific case are they right or wrong in their assessment of him versus his peers.

I think you are a typical casual-fan fool..... for reading compubox

[aboutfkntime]

wait, was that even English that you typed above? Either way, you're 60 yrs old and you've been watching boxing since the 60s, yet you can't name 1 other fighter who has been out landed overall and round by round on compubox in 4 different fights yet still didn't lose? Further proof that compubox stats hold validity and your lame attempt to discredit it because you're a Canelo groupie proves how pathetic you are.

you are a fkn idiot kid

according to compubox, Golovkin won every round against Brook

according to the judges..... 2 judges awarded Brook 2 rounds, and 1 of them awarded him 3

you don't even realize what a moron you look like to knowledgeable fans

stay dumb you silly cvnt

it says right here, that not all landed punches are official scoring criteria..... AND it explains why.....



you casual-fans are fkn morons seriously

[Jab jab boom]

you are a fkn idiot kid

according to compubox, Golovkin won every round against Brook

according to the judges..... 2 judges awarded Brook 2 rounds, and 1 of them awarded him 3

you don't even realize what a moron you look like to knowledgeable fans

stay dumb you silly cvnt

it says right here, that not all landed punches are official scoring criteria..... AND it explains why.....



you casual-fans are fkn morons seriously

you're not answering anyone's questions. The other poster sonned you just like I did. Your insult filled replies clearly indicate that you're in over your head and once again, you look like a buffoon. You've lost once again. Checkmate b***h.

[john l]

Could not hit him with a handful of rice. ATG and could have beat ANY 135pder in history.

[aboutfkntime]

you're not answering anyone's questions. The other poster sonned you just like I did. Your insult filled replies clearly indicate that you're in over your head and once again, you look like a buffoon. You've lost once again. Checkmate b***h.

you got handled son, deal with it.....

according to compubox, Golovkin won every round against Brook

according to the judges..... 2 judges awarded Brook 2 rounds, and 1 of them awarded him 3

you don't even realize what a moron you look like to knowledgeable fans

learn the sport, start at 4.30.....

[aboutfkntime]

dear lord, I promise to be good.....

please protect us from evil.....

especially from criminals, from the mentally insane, and from compubox-reading morons

amen

[Jab jab boom]

dear lord, I promise to be good.....

please protect us from evil.....

especially from criminals, from the mentally insane, and from compubox-reading morons

amen

yeah, you may as well get right with the lord now. At your advanced age of 77,you don't have much time left.