Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

[Boxing_1013]

because, Boxing1013 is a total fkn moron who thinks that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara, Cotto, and Trout, are for Canelo LOOOOOL

also..... Vanes = " good "..... Mosley = " ok "

that is why there is an argument

truly delicious

Golovkin probably logs on here and thinks..... omg, I wish that idiot would shut up

#doinggolovkinnofavorswhatsoeverLMAO

Dude I promise you that you feel a lot more strongly about GGG than I do lol...if GGG KOed Canelo I think you would have a mental breakdown...I would laugh and say 'good win'.

If Nelo KOed GGG I would say 'wow! nice win'...you would cry tears of joy...you're not even a fan of GGG yet he is the topic in 90% of your posts...I mean what are you even doing here lol

[aboutfkntime]

Yeah again I just think it's odd that anyone would hype up those wins for Canelo while slighting those for GGG...to each his own I guess.

Kiss that Canelo poster for me later

tell us again how Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe..... are better than Lara, Cotto, and Trout

loooool

you know that you fcuked up, son

just like when you made a fool of yourself over Steve Weisfeld lol

[Boxing_1013]

At 28 Canelo has already faced more world champs so how can there be an argument?

they literally ignore pure facts..no way you can spin it..at 28 Canelo has faced and beaten the better comp

Why is world champs your whole argument lol? All that matters is what that guy had in the ring at the time they fought...Mosley and Cotto were names but not the same fighters or at their best weights...I mean come on dude...same for Baldomir btw...and a few others for Nelo.

Trevor Berbick beat Ali...is that a great win...of course not...I don't deal with all the fluff...all I'm looking at it who/where/when/how you face a guy...and what you do to them...overhyping the past of guys who aren't as good anymore is silly imo...just seems like something to cling to when the facts don't back up what you want it to be.

[aboutfkntime]

At 28 Canelo has already faced more world champs so how can there be an argument?

because, Boxing1013 is a total fkn moron who thinks that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara, Cotto, and Trout, are for Canelo LOOOOOL

also..... Vanes = " good "..... Mosley = " ok "

that is why there is an argument

truly delicious

Golovkin probably logs on here and thinks..... omg, I wish that idiot would shut up

#doinggolovkinnofavorswhatsoeverLMAO

[Boxing_1013]

tell us again how Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe..... are better than Lara, Cotto, and Trout

Yeah again I just think it's odd that anyone would hype up those wins for Canelo while slighting those for GGG...to each his own I guess.

Kiss that Canelo poster for me later

[Larry the boss]

we know

let me simplify.....

Canelo
15-1-1..... against former, current, and future champions:

Golovkin
5-1-1..... against former, current, and future champions:





tell us again how Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe..... are better than Lara, Cotto, and Trout

they literally ignore pure facts..no way you can spin it..at 28 Canelo has faced and beaten the better comp

[Larry the boss]

Just read my posts to you dude..I literally said why imo lol

At 28 Canelo has already faced more world champs so how can there be an argument?

[Boxing_1013]

how???

Just read my posts to you dude..I literally said why imo lol

[aboutfkntime]

I really think it's so funny that you see such a differential between going 12 rounds with Lara and Trout in tough fights, and 12 with old Cotto at 155 in a tough fight...with GGG dominating and stopping Murray Lemieux and Monroe...I really just don't get it and I can't really imagine anyone really hyping up those wins for Canelo while slighting those for GGG...just makes 0 sense imo

we know

let me simplify.....

Canelo
15-1-1..... against former, current, and future champions:

Golovkin
5-1-1..... against former, current, and future champions:





tell us again how Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe..... are better than Lara, Cotto, and Trout

[TonyGe]

you do realize you can have an opinion on catchweights and still kill a guy for not agreeing to one right? not mutually exclusive...

yes the guy doesnt like CW fights.....but everyone was doing them and thats how that MW title was being passed around....and golovkin just did one.....

you can hate CW fights and still accept that they happen....golovkin needed a big fight...and refused to negotiate them

Unless your the guy with the title. He needed a big fight at a catchweight to do what? Get Canelo to fight? He got the fights with Canelo at 160 his preferred weight. Did he need to be involved in catchweights to sign a 100 million dollar contract that other fighters can only dream about. You're are the guy saying he needs a big fight and needs to do a catchweight in order to get it. I guess he disagreed.