Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

[Larry the boss]

You don't get it. "Great" is a judgement. It can't be proven the way you can prove a fighter's won and loss record. A person can have an "educated" opinion or the y can be totally ignorant. Since opinions by their nature can't be proven or disproved, what's the sense of an argument that has no satisfactory ending.
I can tell you've got some strong opinions about Golovkin. if you can come up with some facts {things that can be verified) I'm happy to continue the discussion.
Ex."Floyd was great" (Opinion) "Floyd was 50-0"(Fact)

what are these wins he has that makes his resume not trash man..he is 37 and has only defeated 5 current or former world champs..while Canelo at 28 has already defeated 15..how can you spin that?

[ruedboy]

Has he defeated anyone who was even close to great?? only 5 were even world champs for crying out loud...0 hall of famers..NONE!!!! what are you celebrating is the better question

You don't get it. "Great" is a judgement. It can't be proven the way you can prove a fighter's won and loss record. A person can have an "educated" opinion or the y can be totally ignorant. Since opinions by their nature can't be proven or disproved, what's the sense of an argument that has no satisfactory ending.
I can tell you've got some strong opinions about Golovkin. if you can come up with some facts {things that can be verified) I'm happy to continue the discussion.
Ex."Floyd was great" (Opinion) "Floyd was 50-0"(Fact)

[TonyGe]

which one of the scrubs on G's resume, could have beaten Canelo?

name him..... ?

this will be funny

name him, Tony Baloney !!

FACT: the best win on Golovkin's resume was a HUGE underdog

think about that

Think about the fact that you can't read. I know you have a teeny tiny brain but do yourself a favor and reread what I wrote. You are embarrassing yourself. Again...

[Larry the boss]

oh for ****s sake.... stop it

guy has to be trolling

[aboutfkntime]

How do you determine a "great" win? What's the criteria?

this is why G always gets credit for imaginary wins

[Larry the boss]

How do you determine a "great" win? What's the criteria?

Has he defeated anyone who was even close to great?? only 5 were even world champs for crying out loud...0 hall of famers..NONE!!!! what are you celebrating is the better question

[aboutfkntime]

How do you determine a "great" win? What's the criteria?

oh for ****s sake.... stop it

[aboutfkntime]

How hard is it to understand that saying a fighter beat a world champ (or even faced a world champ) is meaningless without giving some context? Context is simply more info, such as the former champ's age, how long ago did he win the title, what weight was the title for etc.
Alverez defeated former world champ Shane Mosley, Mosley was over 40 at the time, he had lost 7X and he had just had a draw with Sergio Mora. To say Alvarez beat the former 3x world champ Mosely sounds impressive but you have to know less than nothing about boxing, to be impressed. SMH

the fact remains..... the thread starter came to his " conclusions " by labeling Vanes as "good"..... and Mosley as "ok"

he also said that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara, Cotto, and Trout, were for Canelo

surely you can see whats up there..... ?

[aboutfkntime]

" isn't elite "..... ???

You tell me Larry sir, i am baffled by your musings. Would you tell golovkin to his face that his resume sucks?

Im on your side btw i would enjoy watching you annihilate prettyboy32. But I can't just say nothing while you discredit a mans whole life and hard work (ggg) his resume isn't elite but don't pretend like he wasnt ducked in his prime and ripened for the cherrypick (and still arguably won) by canelo.

a far more accurate word is..... " average "

FACT: the fights were there..... because, I can name them

FACT: Golovkin is 100% responsible - therefore accountable - for his own shabby resume, because of his own timid selection policy

[aboutfkntime]

I don't think you know how language and words even work lol

well, I know that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe..... are not better wins than Lara, Cotto, and Trout

keep..... " trying "

or, whatever it is that you are doing LMAO