Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???

[aboutfkntime]

spot quiz:

guess who has.....

1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) no signature win on his resume'
4) no 365m deal with DAZN
5) no pride
6) egg on his face
7) lumps on his face
8) the shlttiest fanbase in all of boxing

[BoxingIsGreat]

spot quiz:

guess who has.....

1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) no signature win on his resume'
4) no 365m deal with DAZN
5) no pride
6) egg on his face
7) lumps on his face
8) the shlttiest fanbase in all of boxing

That's so harsh, man. Why so hateful? C'mon bro.

[Boxing_1013]

you make up quotes, and insert them into your sig ?

really ?

you just got KO'd son LMAO

answer the question, you spastic little fukwit

name those 6 " great " wins !!

FACT: now everyone knows that you are just a shlt-talking idiot

Yep as soon as you name those great Canelo wins you were talking about I will name the great GGG wins imo

[Dasmius Shinobi]

spot quiz:

guess who has.....

1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) no signature win on his resume'
4) no 365m deal with DAZN
5) no pride
6) egg on his face
7) lumps on his face
8) the shlttiest fanbase in all of boxing

G-String and the Golovtards.

[aboutfkntime]

Yep as soon as you name those great Canelo wins you were talking about I will name the great GGG wins imo

you are the clown who started talking about " great " wins

you shlt-mouth casual-fan fukwit

then you backed out the door, thinking that nobody would notice LMAO

FACT: everyone knows that you are just a fanboy idiot who makes claims that he cannot back up

Q. what sort of a fkn idiot would say that Murray Lemieux and Monroe, are better than Lara Cotto and Trout?

Q. and what sort of fkn idiot would say that Barrera, Bika, and Miranda..... are as good as Andre Ward?

A. the same sort of fukwit who would create a thread quoting Weisfeld..... not realizing that Weisfeld scored that fight for Golovkin

b,b,b,b,but....

embarrassing LMAO

[stealthradon]

spot quiz:

guess who has.....

1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) no signature win on his resume'
4) no 365m deal with DAZN
5) no pride
6) egg on his face
7) lumps on his face
8) the shlttiest fanbase in all of boxing

Guess who has
1) A permanent stain on his record for drug use
2) Multiple broken weight clauses
3) Multiple questionable decisions
4) The most díckloving fanbase in all of boxing, who can't tell a fight
5) No balls
6) A draw against Jacobs, because neither had any damage to the face.
7) A draw against Jorge Juarez
8) A gift decision against a 5-17
9) Zero clear wins against anyone below the age of 35, in his own weight class and active fighters. ZERO. The exact same number of times you have had sex with humans.

[aboutfkntime]

Guess who has
1) A permanent stain on his record for drug use
2) Multiple broken weight clauses
3) Multiple questionable decisions
4) The most díckloving fanbase in all of boxing, who can't tell a fight
5) No balls
6) A draw against Jacobs, because neither had any damage to the face.
7) A draw against Jorge Juarez
8) A gift decision against a 5-17
9) Zero clear wins against anyone below the age of 35, in his own weight class and active fighters. ZERO. The exact same number of times you have had sex with humans.

what..... did..... you..... just..... say..... ?

did you say that facial damage is the #1 scoring criteria..... ?

do I need to post a pic of Golovkin after the Canelo rematch..... ?

careful

[aboutfkntime]

Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think.

in a thread titled.....

" Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins??? "

you were STUPID enough to post that G has " 5-6 'great' wins ".....

but you were then completely unable to even name 1 of these..... "great" wins LMAO

how fkn ironic is that ?

what is more ironic.....

you, providing a PERFECT demonstration why Golovkin's idiot fanbase give him credit for imaginary wins.....

or, you..... misquoting Steve Weisfeld to favor Golovkin, but being completely unaware that he judged the fight? loooool

oh lordie LMAO

please..... make my day by explaining why you think that Murray, Lemieux, and Monroe..... were better wins for Hypekin..... then Lara, Cotto, and Trout were..... for Canelo

then, you can make my year by explaining why you think that Bika, Barrera, and Miranda..... are as good as Andre Ward lol

you dribbling spastic casual-fan idiot

[aboutfkntime]

Golovkin's legacy, in 20 years.....

boxing fan 1: hey, remember that Borat guy, the middleweight

boxing fan 2: who ?

boxing fan 1: you know, that guy..... Golovkin

boxing fan 2: nope

boxing fan 1: you know, the foreign guy everyone made fun of

boxing fan 2: nope, who'd he beat ?

boxing fan 1: ummm, not sure..... nobody really

boxing fan 2: nope, don't remember him

boxing fan 1: hey, remember that guy Broner...... he was a good fighter, funny too

boxing fan 2: yea, I remember him..... funny dude, good fighter

[stealthradon]

what..... did..... you..... just..... say..... ?

did you say that facial damage is the #1 scoring criteria..... ?

do I need to post a pic of Golovkin after the Canelo rematch..... ?

careful

No idiot. I know that sarcasm and logic eludes you, but since you like to judge a fight on facial damage, Canelo's fight against Jacobs must have been a draw, right? Whereas GGG clearly beat Jacobs, the Canelo Jacobs fight must have been a draw.