Hagler-Seales draw... weirdest scoring ever?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DaNeutral.
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2018
    • 10087
    • 1,665
    • 342
    • 144,794

    #21
    Originally posted by Redd Foxx
    You noticed since AJ lost there's some salty ass British posters following people around, just ankle biting? It's like, they can't brag about much anymore so they just try to annoy.
    Oh look another one bringing up the name ANTHONY JOSHUA. Who the hells talking about Anthony Joshua right now? YOU. This isnt even an Anthony Joshua thread.

    Comment

    • DaNeutral.
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2018
      • 10087
      • 1,665
      • 342
      • 144,794

      #22
      Originally posted by _Rexy_
      Nowhere in my post did I mention rounds before or after. So you can't judge a match, nor can you read. Okay.
      Yes you did, look up its right there. Some BS about rounds 1 and 2. I didnt say that, you did, its in your post. I could of read a bit harder but as soon as you said you are above professional judges and dont score fights properly i stopped paying attention cuz whats the point when you cant do it properly.

      Comment

      • _Rexy_
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jan 2018
        • 27929
        • 6,140
        • 3,585
        • 358,040

        #23
        Originally posted by DaNeutral.
        Yes you did, look up its right there. Some BS about rounds 1 and 2. I didnt say that, you did, its in your post. I could of read a bit harder but as soon as you said you are above professional judges and dont score fights properly i stopped paying attention cuz whats the point when you cant do it properly.

        Okay, let's break down my post.


        And we can compare scorecards if you like? Since you're a pro in scoring cards. How often do you give out tie rounds? This is a question. Nothing here about previous rounds. Looks like a question to me

        I just ask because a tie round in the 10 point must system is reserved for when the fighter who wins the round has a point deducted, something typically along those lines. Little educational tidbit that you ignored because it makes you look like a ****ing idiot for saying that you give tie rounds whenever it's close. Don't blame you for ignoring it

        Not because "well, AJ looked better against Andy in the second round than he did in the first and I don't want to put AJ down by two soooooo" Oh, is this what you mean? It's called an explanation. I assumed that what I was saying would help you if I gave an explanation, like how a dictionary gives a definition. I'm sorry for doing this. I had attempted to make this easier for you, I didn't think it would confuse you

        It's almost like they invented a particular point system where you MUST give TEN POINTS to someone. If only they could give it a less complicated name than "the ten point must system" since that's clearly confusing to some people.

        I assume you just skipped this part entirely then. I don't blame you

        Comment

        • DaNeutral.
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Aug 2018
          • 10087
          • 1,665
          • 342
          • 144,794

          #24
          Originally posted by _Rexy_
          Okay, let's break down my post.


          And we can compare scorecards if you like? Since you're a pro in scoring cards. How often do you give out tie rounds? This is a question. Nothing here about previous rounds. Looks like a question to me

          I just ask because a tie round in the 10 point must system is reserved for when the fighter who wins the round has a point deducted, something typically along those lines. Little educational tidbit that you ignored because it makes you look like a ****ing idiot for saying that you give tie rounds whenever it's close. Don't blame you for ignoring it

          Not because "well, AJ looked better against Andy in the second round than he did in the first and I don't want to put AJ down by two soooooo" Oh, is this what you mean? It's called an explanation. I assumed that what I was saying would help you if I gave an explanation, like how a dictionary gives a definition. I'm sorry for doing this. I had attempted to make this easier for you, I didn't think it would confuse you

          It's almost like they invented a particular point system where you MUST give TEN POINTS to someone. If only they could give it a less complicated name than "the ten point must system" since that's clearly confusing to some people.

          I assume you just skipped this part entirely then. I don't blame you
          Im not saying im a pro im just saying YOU do it wrong and you even admitted to it by saying you ignore how it is done professionally and you refuse to score drawn rounds. And then on top of that i claim you gift PBC fighters rounds they havnt won cuz you are a shill.

          Thats all im saying my American friend. You cant score a fight for ****. Actually i bet you can score a fight perfectly well, you just choose not to.

          Comment

          • _Rexy_
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2018
            • 27929
            • 6,140
            • 3,585
            • 358,040

            #25
            Originally posted by DaNeutral.
            Im not saying im a pro im just saying YOU do it wrong and you even admitted to it by saying you ignore how it is done professionally and you refuse to score drawn rounds. And then on top of that i claim you gift PBC fighters rounds they havnt won cuz you are a shill.

            Thats all im saying my American friend. You cant score a fight for ****. Actually i bet you can score a fight perfectly well, you just choose not to.
            Okay, so now you're just making things up now. Gotcha.

            Comment

            • Citizen Koba
              Deplorable Peacenik
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2013
              • 20457
              • 3,951
              • 3,801
              • 2,875,273

              #26
              interesting discussion - though as pointed out by a few others it's more one for the history section.

              On the scoring banter between Rexy and DaNeutral I think Rexy has the clearer understanding of how scoring works - like it or loath it. The judges have to (must) give at least one of the guys ten points before deductions and under current scoring guidelines (certainly under the training given by the ABC) are very strongly discouraged from giving 10 points to both.

              I think it has been much more common to score 10 - 10 rounds at times in the past however which may go some way to explaining the unusual scoring in this particular bout.

              Comment

              • _Rexy_
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2018
                • 27929
                • 6,140
                • 3,585
                • 358,040

                #27
                Originally posted by Koba-Grozny
                interesting discussion - though as pointed out by a few others it's more one for the history section.

                On the scoring banter between Rexy and DaNeutral I think Rexy has the clearer understanding of how scoring works - like it or loath it. The judges have to (must) give at least one of the guys ten points before deductions and under current scoring guidelines (certainly under the training given by the ABC) are very strongly discouraged from giving 10 points to both.

                I think it has been much more common to score 10 - 10 rounds at times in the past however which may go some way to explaining the unusual scoring in this particular bout.
                There's a new thread with this topic in the history section now

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP