Why do people rate Canelo's resume so high, even relative to GGG's?

[icha]

So weight classes and when you face a guy matter...but Mosley at 40 years old and clearly shot...at 154 pounds...going 12 rounds with him...is somehow still a great win.

When just 1.5 years later Anthony Mundine stopped Mosey at 154 pounds...lol come on

mosley isnt a great win despite having gone toe to toe with sergio mora at 154 not long before canelo, but lets not ignore that canelo was only like 20yo when they fought... ggg at that age was feasting on kids and wearing head gear...
canelo at 17yo already had beaten a better fighter than ggg did at 30...

[Boxing_1013]

how can Vanes be a good win for Golovkin..... when he was inactive and coming off a loss?

how can Murray be a good win..... losing 3x since Golovkin?

how can Jacobs be a good win, losing to Canelo..... ?

how can Monroe be better than Trout..... when nobody had ever heard of Monroe, and he got outclassed by Saunders?

see how that works LMAO

I honestly feel bad for you man lol...you can't really understand pretty basic concepts..it's sad lol

And not that it really matters...but GGG beat those guys better than anyone else did...before or after...and all of their losses were to good fighters.

Getting stopped 1.5 years later by Mundine...who is not very good...I think that shows Mosley's level at that time.

[bigdunny1]

vanes was a career JMW. unlike mosley, a hall of famer, he had never, you know, actually done anything. 2 years prior shane put the best fighter on the planet on f#cking ***** street. he was on the pound for pound list when he fought floyd! vanes had no fights for 2 years! and you're in here talking about the combination vanes landed on golovkin . you can pretend he wasn't washed up based on everything he showed you in the 2 round beating he took, i think you're being dishonest in addition to not knowing what the f#ck you're talking about.


vanes only lost to golovkin because of the size, guys. you know, the small, career middlweight all the way back to the amateurs, who actually gave up about half an inch in height and had a massive, 1.5" reach advantage.


oh boy. oh boy oh boy

you want a shovel, pal? all you gotta do is talk a little more, i think.

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/qcZ1A1peO4u2c/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Boxing_1013]

vanes was a career JMW. unlike mosley, a hall of famer, he had never, you know, actually done anything. 2 years prior shane put the best fighter on the planet on f#cking ***** street. he was on the pound for pound list when he fought floyd! vanes had no fights for 2 years! and you're in here talking about the combination vanes landed on golovkin . you can pretend he wasn't washed up based on everything he showed you in the 2 round beating he took, i think you're being dishonest in addition to not knowing what the f#ck you're talking about.


vanes only lost to golovkin because of the size, guys. you know, the small, career middlweight all the way back to the amateurs, who actually gave up about half an inch in height and had a massive, 1.5" reach advantage.


oh boy. oh boy oh boy

you want a shovel, pal? all you gotta do is talk a little more, i think.

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/qcZ1A1peO4u2c/*****.gif[/IMG]

How do you guys feel about Mundine KOing Mosley at 154 pounds shortly after Mosley's fight with Canelo? Genuinely curious.

[bigdunny1]

How do you guys feel about Mundine KOing Mosley at 154 pounds shortly after Mosley's fight with Canelo? Genuinely curious.

How you feel about Lemieux getting white washed shortly after he fought GGG hell what about lemieux being KO'D and beaten twice before GGG by B and C class fighters? yet your fruity azzz has Lemieux nas one of his best wins. LMAO

there is no spin where vanes who was a retired gate keeper and career 154lber who didn't fight in 2 years and hadn't had a win in 3 years. Yet you continue calling Vanes a good win...but go ahead keep making a jack azzz out yourself. You MAKE GGG look like a even bigger joke with his shyt resume these type threads then he already is.

[Boxing_1013]

How you feel about Lemieux getting white washed shortly after he fought GGG hell what about lemieux being KO'D and beaten twice before GGG by B and C class fighters? yet your fruity azzz has Lemieux nas one of his best wins. LMAO

there is no spin where vanes who was a retired gate keeper and career 154lber who didn't fight in 2 years and hadn't had a win in 3 years. Yet you continue calling Vanes a good win...but go ahead keep making a jack azzz out yourself. You MAKE GGG look like a even bigger joke with his shyt resume these type threads then he already is.

He literally has a better resume than Canelo right now lol.

I said Vanes is a good win in the sense of how GGG got it done...circumstances obviously were not ideal for him there...but it was commonly accepted that he was a really good fighter before that fight...so slighting him after the fact I just don't really co-sign...similar win for Nelo with Kirkland...difference mainly there is Vanes is not a top 10 win for GGG...Kirkland is for Nelo from what I can tell.

Lemieux was at his peak and had won 9 fights in a row, all over decent or good fighters.

GGG destroyed Lemieux in 8 rounds...another great fighter dominated Lemieux over 12 rounds a few years later, by winning almost every round by a few points...would not call that getting 'white washed' lol...that's getting KOed etc in my book.

Not the same situations as fighting a 40 year old formerly great fighter at a high weight...going 12 rounds with them...and then a not very good fighter KOing them in 7 rounds a year or so later.

Honestly the difference between me/GGG 'fans' and a lot of people who rate Canelo and don't like GGG...is if someone makes a good negative point about GGG it is usually acknowledged and probably accepted...the other side seems to fight tooth and nail to make things out to be what they want.

If you want to see just how pedestrian Canel's resume is compared to GGG's...leave them out of each other's lists and list their top 10 wins.

[icha]

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/10A5K3115OVVUk/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Boxing_1013]

How you feel about Lemieux getting white washed shortly after he fought GGG hell what about lemieux being KO'D and beaten twice before GGG by B and C class fighters? yet your fruity azzz has Lemieux nas one of his best wins. LMAO

there is no spin where vanes who was a retired gate keeper and career 154lber who didn't fight in 2 years and hadn't had a win in 3 years. Yet you continue calling Vanes a good win...but go ahead keep making a jack azzz out yourself. You MAKE GGG look like a even bigger joke with his shyt resume these type threads then he already is.

Why did that question make you so emotional btw?

All I asked was what you guys thought about Mundine KOing Mosley shortly after Canelo went 12 rounds with him...seems like coming across that info, one may say "OK, this wasn't really that good of a win" for Canelo...but to each his own I guess...you can get riled up if you want to and try to defend it lol

[Boxing_1013]

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/10A5K3115OVVUk/*****.gif[/IMG]

Dude I have yet to really see a coherent neutral argument for why Canelo's resume is so good and GGG's so bad...if you base a thread by fan comments defending their favorite fighter at all costs, then I guess you can see it that way? lol...idk I just haven't really seen any impartial points to prove my points wrong att

[icha]

Dude I have yet to really see a coherent neutral argument for why Canelo's resume is so good and GGG's so bad...if you base a thread by fan comments defending their favorite fighter at all costs, then I guess you can see it that way? lol...idk I just haven't really seen any impartial points to prove my points wrong att

do you have no friends on this forum?
someone needs to stop you from doing this to your self...
it was kind of fun during the first pages, but now is getting ugly...