DAZN now has 1.2M Subscribers in the U.S.

[bigdunny1]

Different, actually. The big difference being they represent worldwide vs. US figures.

Reported viewers on DAZN for Canelo fight was 1.2 million worldwide and 600 thousand on DAZN in the US.

This article says DAZN has 4 million subscribers worldwide and 1.2 million subscribers in the US.

exactly and those were live views not subscribers. They aren't the same numbers, Motorcity Welch is really grasping at straws. lol Bloomberg is now the most credible to speak on DAZN subscription numbers and they don't just make shyt up they have real business insider sources but somehow they got confused with views vs subscribers and then got it confused with global vs US Market even though they clearly reported on BOTH global and US market. Sure Bloomberg messed up because Motorcity Welch who has been lying and making up shyt from day 1 says so. Hmmm let's see who we should all believe I mean it's a tough one but Bloomberg > Motorcity Welch LMAO

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/EouEzI5bBR8uk/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Motorcity Cobra]

Different, actually. The big difference being they represent worldwide vs. US figures.

Reported viewers on DAZN for Canelo fight was 1.2 million worldwide and 600 thousand on DAZN in the US.

This article says DAZN has 4 million subscribers worldwide and 1.2 million subscribers in the US.

No it's not different as you see below. These are the Canelo numbers

Here's the other Forbes story with the same exact 1.2 mil number. But in this story, unlike the story posted here, the source DAZN for the 1.2 mil number

https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterkahn/2019/05/09/dazn-delivers-a-big-punch-for-sponsors-over-1-2-million-people-watched-canelo-vs-jacobs-stream/amp/

Now in the story Dunny posted they source the baseball numbers (anonymously) but don't source the 1.2 mil number. Which is the exact same number from the Canelo fight they used in the other article



No link, no source. And they're using the old ESPN plus numbers.

I'm the best when it comes to writing topics that fit my narrative using leading statements. That's how I quickly identified what was going on in this article

[BoxingIsGreat]

What's the total cost of all the main networks/apps that show boxing? If you wanted to see all the good boxers, you would need all these networks, or an alternative way to see them. What's the total?

I will stick to my streaming all of them for free!

[bigdunny1]

C'mon MCC you're embarrassing yourself. Don't let me bring the pain in this thread because my balls itch and smell like vanilla coconut ice cream right nowz!

You know the 1.2mil were from Worldwide streams for the Canelo Jacobs fight. Wouldn't it have been more sweet had DAZN said it streamed 1.2mil simply in the U.S? No, they went gangsta and reported that 1.2 million people worldwide watched live across the company’s eight current markets. The truth is better than fabrication and DAZN were humble about it, like my balls! That doesn't translate to US subscriptions. During that time didn't DAZN insinuate from an inside source that they were CLOSE to a million subs and all you PBC LDBC SHILLS said ''oh that can mean anything....400K is 'close' to 1mil too'' blah blah etc..

Bruh, why are you afraid of PBC to lose? Enough with Barbershop Conversation narratives mayne. That guy has sex with frogs on Thursdays twice on Sundays!

The most creditible reliable source to ever speak on subscription numbers before this was the former HBO exec that went on record saying they were close to 1M US subscribers a few weeks before the Canelo fight. Now Bloomberg says they are at 1.2M subscribers and they don't phuk around they have reliable sources and could give 2 phuks about trying to negative or positive spin about boxing lol

But Motorcity Welch still refuses to believe it. Nope because he and his agenda he's been spinning from day 1 about DAZN and his lies crumble if he acknowledges it. Remember days before the HBO exec told the world DAZN is already close to 1M subscribers this phuk boy was spamming these boards saying that DAZN has less then 100K subscribers something he was clearly wrong about. LMAO

Motorcity Welch face whenever DAZN news drops

[bigjavi973]

I had missed this. by ''Cable TV'' you mean the channel choices that you get on Direct TV as well? Isn't Sling TV an OTT, meaning there's no hub/device/proprietary hardware like a Cable company? Plus OTT relies on streaming bandwidth vs traditional coaxial bandwidth?

I think elite internet bandwidth for like 4K compressed streams should be as fast navigation as traditional cable boxes? I do recall cable protocol with remote FAST. of course a different protocol and proprietary.

That's perhaps the main difference in cost aside from some channels not on other platforms. It's about navigation and speed/refresh with categories and menus.

$25 bucks aint bad. Isnt Direct TV like $60 minimum? different protocol of course.

yup.....

streams right to my smart tv, phone or computer/laptop

I can literally watch tv anywhere I go....

direct tv has similar but more expensive etc...

oh and I also get on demand shows etc.

if a movie starts... sometimes I get the option of watching it FROM THE BEGINNING...

I dont think the direct tv app thing does the same

[The Big Dunn]

It’s great for Dazn and their employees that someone has finally confirmed they are over 1 mil subscribers. I would want to know if this total includes cancellations. If they are at 1.2 mil after all the cancellations post Canelo fights then they are doing very well.

I still don’t understand why the pro Dazn people equate value with paying $19.99 for fights that don’t warrant that amount.

Canelo fights on Dazn are imo a bargain. The rest of the fights are not worth the price but you have had some really good fights and the Ruiz upset.

[bigdunny1]

nah, lets not be crazy, its better than average doe.

randomly this is dazn f#cking mcc's mom while he's in his room and the real reason behind his grudge against dazn. Can't say i blame his haterism of a platform.

lmao!!!!!!!!!!!

[sweetpea87]

If they got NFL on there with MLB then I bet it would do really good here. I have no problem with DAZN, I’m just not a big enough sports fan to have a year long subscription to it. That’s one of the things I liked the most about boxing being on HBO/Showtime was having the access to their movies and TV shows.

[rolshans]

I still don’t understand why the pro Dazn people equate value with paying $19.99 for fights that don’t warrant that amount.

I can't speak for anyone else, but I equate value with paying $99.99 for a year of DAZN, not $20/month.

[Thuglife Nelo]

If they got NFL on there with MLB then I bet it would do really good here. I have no problem with DAZN, I’m just not a big enough sports fan to have a year long subscription to it. That’s one of the things I liked the most about boxing being on HBO/Showtime was having the access to their movies and TV shows.

That’s efficient paradox with DAZN. Even if you don’t fancy $100 a full year, the $20 actually is, essentially, a PPV. The difference is that it’s on demand AND YOU GET A MONTH WORTH OF FIGHTS + other content.

DAZN matchmakers try their best to bleed a hype fight that includes at least one other good fight before you decide to renew. The effect is that if a customer has a good experience with this, after paying $40 back to back or randomly, it means consumer- theory probability has the boxing fan paying for the full year. Plus, this DAZN buyer or enthusiast gets a full years worth of various sports content.

This is what ESPN already provides. The difference is that they just have Loma and Bud and I guess Fury. Truth is, GBP is going into a new gen. young guns for the start of 2020. All by design. DAZN is in it for the long run, and as years go by their interface will get better, and it will have toooo much unique content.