Charlo gets handed a title he would have never won if he actually had to fight the champ. - Paper Champ
Wilder lost to Fury but Fury was robbed. - Paper Champ
PBC seems to have a lot of champions. If there's two you disagree with out of a dozen or however many they have, is it really fair to label the whole group paper champions?
I don't know who would have won between Charlo and Canelo, but if Canelo was never going to fight Charlo, how much longer should the WBC have waited before stripping Canelo?
I thought Fury won. I had him up four going into the final round and had him winning the fight by two points after giving Wilder a 10-8 in the 12th. Not sure what your definition of robbery is. One round switched on my card would have been a draw. Maybe you had it wider. They're fighting a rematch, so we'll see what happens. Hard to call Wilder a paper champion though. He didn't win a vacant title. He beat the champion convincingly. He's made a lot of defenses since. I think Fury is the #1 heavyweight right now and Wilder has agreed to fight him again. How is that a paper champion?
Comment