Comments Thread For: Lomachenko-Campbell: All Terms Agreed To For August 31, London
Collapse
-
-
Campbell has some good qualities, but he still got beat (in my opinion) by Linares, and Campbell was taller than him.
Loma ended up being too good for Linares. Yes you can say that's a triangle theory, but to me that shows the level Loma is at.
It's a decent match up, Campbell is high ranked contender, but I wouldn't give him a realistic chance of winning.Comment
-
Comment
-
Yeah but Crolla v Loma was one of, if not THE, most predictable fight outcome I've ever known.
Just because Campbell winning is less unlikely than Crolla doesn't mean it has a realistic chance of happening.Comment
-
I'm happy for Campbell to get a big fight. I considered him a little unlucky in that Linares fight, which came at a difficult time for him also.
He's a good fighter. It's just that here, he's up against one of the very best.Comment
-
Yea.. He's a small dude. He can fight some good fights at Lightweight but these guys like Davis need to stop ducking him.Comment
-
Totally agree, I mean Campbell is a decent fighter and i don't want to disrespect him at all. He is just facing a great fighter in Loma, I mean he could have done what some are doing, pretend as if Loma doesn't exist.Comment
-
Yeah I agree mate. He's a very tidy fighter and underrated somewhat I feel.
When a chance to face Loma came about, he was always going to take it, as opposed to just using Loma's name to build his profile like others have.Comment
Comment