Hypocrites on NSB

[turnedup]

Dude..you opened a can of excuses and bullshhh on here. People have selective memories and opinions when it suits them.

[Thuglife Nelo]

He vacated the WBC title to fight Liam Smith...

Wrong premise. He vacated the WBC because Loeffler wanted it to go to purse bid and Canelo was in litigation with All Star Boxing (former promoter).

[Robbie Barrett]

Here’s the timeline:

Canelo has 3 belts and GGG wants a chance to win them back.

Canelo fans say GGG should fight Charlo first and to stop ducking Charlo.

Canelo then gets stripped of his title for not fighting Charlo. That’s followed by Charlo and his team saying Canelo ducked him.

Everyone who was on GGG’s case for not fighting Charlo laughs at the notion that Canelo is ducking Charlo.

They point out that Canelo has fought GGG twice and Danny Jacobs. It’s strange because when it was pointed out that GGG wasn’t ducking Charlo because he fought Danny Jacobs and Canelo twice, no one cared.

Also, all the people who got on GGGs case for vacating the IBF don’t seem to care that Canelo did the same thing with the wbc.

These same fans then question Charlos resume at 160, something they ignored completely when trying to claim GGG was ducking Charlo and people mentioned that maybe Charlo hasn’t earned the shot.

I just wanted to point this out. And just to be clear, Canelo and GGG are both great fighters and neither are ducking Charlo. The idea that they are is silly.

Canelo wasn't stripped you dumbass, he's still the WBC champ. Just like the WBA superchamp is the real champ. Regular WBC doesn't mean **** now until Canelo loses that title.

[Nehnenqui]

Wrong premise. He vacated the WBC because Loeffler wanted it to go to purse bid and Canelo was in litigation with All Star Boxing (former promoter).

There’s my fellow LDBC hoodrat hoochie hoe killa!

We in dis thang mayne!

[ShaneMosleySr]

So GGG is in the wrong for fighting Canelo instead of Derevianchenko and getting stripped of the IBF.

But if the IBF made a special title for GGG so he wouldn’t have to fight mandatories anymore, he would have been in the right.

Got it.

Canelo wasn't stripped you dumbass, he's still the WBC champ. Just like the WBA superchamp is the real champ. Regular WBC doesn't mean **** now until Canelo loses that title.

[Robbie Barrett]

So GGG is in the wrong for fighting Canelo instead of Derevianchenko and getting stripped of the IBF.

But if the IBF made a special title for GGG so he wouldn’t have to fight mandatories anymore, he would have been in the right.

Got it.

Golovkin was given a WBA superchamp title wasn't he? No difference here. Whoever hold the highest title is the champ, that's Canelo.

[Chuckguy]

Canelo ain’t fighting Vanes or Rolls, dumbass. If he fights someone that bad you’d have a case.

No he fights rocky fawking fielding instead but gets a pass.

[ShaneMosleySr]

Golovkin also fought his WBA mandatory when he had that belt and would still be expected to fight mandatories if he wins it back.

Golovkin was given a WBA superchamp title wasn't he? No difference here. Whoever hold the highest title is the champ, that's Canelo.

[Robbie Barrett]

Golovkin also fought his WBA mandatory when he had that belt and would still be expected to fight mandatories if he wins it back.

Has the WBC ordered a mandatory for Canelo? Don't blame Canelo for the WBC's decisions.

[Nehnenqui]

So GGG is in the wrong for fighting Canelo instead of Derevianchenko and getting stripped of the IBF.

But if the IBF made a special title for GGG so he wouldn’t have to fight mandatories anymore, he would have been in the right.

Got it.

It was Vanes instead of Derevyanchenko you lying sack of s**t.

There was no Canelo instead of Derevyanchenko scenario that you pulled out of your ass.