Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Charlo-Cota Main Event Averaged 1,832,000 Viewers For FOX

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
    All a sudden now if it's a PBC fight they add shyt like streaming numbers, the spanish broadcast which is a totally different channel, youtube videos, etc LMAO

    How about this article also written by Keith Idec for boxingscene

    https://www.boxingscene.com/top-rank...-night--125012


    Top Rank's ESPN Show Averaged 741,000 Viewers Saturday Night

    By Keith Idec

    Top Rank’s show Saturday night didn’t resonate with viewers the way its previous ESPN card did.

    Its doubleheader featuring Gilberto Ramirez and Jerwin Ancajas in separate fights averaged 741,000 viewers, according to ratings released Tuesday by Nielsen Media Research. Top Rank’s last ESPN offering of 2017, headlined by Vasyl Lomachenko and Guillermo Rigondeaux, averaged 1.73 million viewers December 9.



    Notice the title has the avg for the entire card NOT the main event avg which was obviously much larger. Then notice the first sentence in the article letting you know the ratings are DOWN even taking a shot saying the fight didn't resonate with viewers. Also nowhere in this entire article does he add the ESPN TV ratings with the ESPN Deportes TV Ratings. Now read how they reported on this fight and how this same clown azzz writer just reported on a fight by PBC. Adding FOX Deportes ratings and steaming numbers, leading with the Main fight ratings which was only 10 mins and not the entire card ratings. No mention that the Hurd fight ratings were already down the second WORST of the series or that this fight on Sunday did the absolute WORST TV ratings passing the Leo Santa Cruz fight ratings. Or the fact that Charlo's LAST fight was also on PBC on FOX and that card drew 1,971,000 while this card drew 1.2M a HUGE drop off.

    This is straight up FOX News now. You have different ways of reporting the TV Ratings now created for PBC and everyone else because Boxingscene is owned by CBS the same entity that has a network deal with PBC. No conflict of interest right? LMAO
    A golden girl! Who is doing better numbers total this year. PBC or Golden Boy?? I mean your hating hard as fuuck right now.

    Broner vs Pacquiao, Spence vs Garcia. Hurd vs Williams. Porter vs Ugas. Wilder vs Breazele. These numbers. Ruiz Jr. who is also a PBC Haymon fighter.

    SO WHO IS DOING BETTER NUMBERS??? Golden Boy or PBC?? I thought so. Shut the fuuck up

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Phenom View Post
      Why is that one guy keeps posting the wrong information 1.8M is excellent numbers for a non-title fight
      He's been doing it since 2015. Same **** over and over since 2015

      Comment


      • #53
        I watched the card and was entertained. That is what it is all about. I am attending STAR boxing's CATSKILLS CLASH on Friday night in Monticello N.Y. I hope to enjoy myself and could care less if the place is sold out or not. Why argue about ratings and crowd sizes? Just enjoy the fights!

        Comment


        • #54
          Horrible numbers a time buy. It was the lowest of the night.

          Comment


          • #55
            That sounds like a lot

            Charlos seem to pull in big numbers

            Harrison fight did well too

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
              When the PBC ratings started being so bad that's when...Now we cherry pick the best 10 mins of the entire card and only mention those ratings and pretend the first 2Hrs and 50Mins of the card ratings don't matter LMAO

              The real number here is 1.2M that's what the entire card avg'd. By putting 1.8M in the title and leading with that it's to misdirect from what the real numbers are.


              Even if the entire card avg 1.8M (which it never came close to doing) but let's pretend it did it 1.8M avg isn't good. UFC on FOX avg for the ENTIRE card about 2.25M during their entire run on FOX. Their peaks for the main fight of the cards were doing like 3M viewers plus. These are bad ratings. It's now the WORST PBC on FOX ratings of the series beating out the Leo Santa Cruz card that did bad only 1.376M. LMAO

              Here is how this card stacked up against the other Networks during it's time slot...it was dead last only CW did worst and CW is not one of the 4 major networks it always does way lower ratings.



              Here is how this card stacks up against all the other PBC cards since their deal with FOX...Dead Last. Funny how there is ZERO mention in the PBC spin article from Keith Idec that this finished dead last compared to any of the other PBC on FOX cards or that it finished dead last in it's time slot for major Networks.
              You forgot one thing ) World level Boxing is/was divided many many broadcast platforms. You got Showtime,Foxx,ESPN,ESPN+,DAZN and you had HBO. UFC is only on Fox If i am not mistaken. If all World Boxing was broadcasted on one platform, no way it would not avarage better than Boxing take note

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
                When the PBC ratings started being so bad that's when...Now we cherry pick the best 10 mins of the entire card and only mention those ratings and pretend the first 2Hrs and 50Mins of the card ratings don't matter LMAO

                The real number here is 1.2M that's what the entire card avg'd. By putting 1.8M in the title and leading with that it's to misdirect from what the real numbers are.


                Even if the entire card avg 1.8M (which it never came close to doing) but let's pretend it did it 1.8M avg isn't good. UFC on FOX avg for the ENTIRE card about 2.25M during their entire run on FOX. Their peaks for the main fight of the cards were doing like 3M viewers plus. These are bad ratings. It's now the WORST PBC on FOX ratings of the series beating out the Leo Santa Cruz card that did bad only 1.376M. LMAO

                Here is how this card stacked up against the other Networks during it's time slot...it was dead last only CW did worst and CW is not one of the 4 major networks it always does way lower ratings.



                Here is how this card stacks up against all the other PBC cards since their deal with FOX...Dead Last. Funny how there is ZERO mention in the PBC spin article from Keith Idec that this finished dead last compared to any of the other PBC on FOX cards or that it finished dead last in it's time slot for major Networks.
                I cheer every time you come and put the truth ,about PBC's ratings, out there for everyone to see. Idec is always the first to come out purposely misleading the boxing public about PBC's ratings.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Freedef View Post
                  You forgot one thing ) World level Boxing is/was divided many many broadcast platforms. You got Showtime,Foxx,ESPN,ESPN+,DAZN and you had HBO. UFC is only on Fox If i am not mistaken. If all World Boxing was broadcasted on one platform, no way it would not avarage better than Boxing take note
                  WTF kind of twisted logic is this?

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
                    He's been doing it since 2015. Same **** over and over since 2015
                    All he is doing is putting the accurate ratings in the correct context. If that burst your imaginary bubble about PBC's ratings then that is your problem.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Dear Mr. Haymon,

                      Cong**** on 1.8 million on a Sunday night! However, Sunday night boxing is not cool! Some of us on the East Coast actually have to go to work in the morning! You know why the NFL is #1 in the U.S.? Because we can get our fill and call it quits by 8:00PM EST! Please take that into consideration in the future!

                      Very Respectfully,

                      Bronx2245

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP